Why does the FBI keep manufacturing Bogus Terrorists?

talk about different conspiracies ie... JFKs murder, OKC, WACO, 9-11, TWA-800 etc...

Groups working together to subvert freedom ie... Sabbatians, Rosicrucians, OTO, Illuminati, Jacobins, Fabians, Bilderbergs, CFR, TriLats, RIIA, ADL, SPLC, SWC etc...
pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Why does the FBI keep manufacturing Bogus Terrorists?

Post#1 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:17 am

America you are fucked.
pk


Paul Craig Roberts Archive

November 29, 2010
Fabricating Terror

By Paul Craig Roberts

Why does the FBI orchestrate fake terror plots?

The latest one snared Osman Mohamud, a Somali-American teenager in Portland, Oregon. The
Associated Press report by William Mall and Nedra Pickler (11-27-10) is headlined in
Yahoo News: "Somali-born teen plotted car-bombing in Oregon."

This is a misleading headline as the report makes it clear that it was a plot
orchestrated by federal agents. Two sentences into the news report we have this: "The
bomb was an elaborate fake supplied by the [FBI] agents and the public was never in
danger, authorities said."

The teenager was supplied with a fake bomb and a fake detonator.

Three sentences later the reporters contradict the quoted authorities with a quote from
Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon: "The threat was very real."

The reporters then contradict Balizan: "White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said Saturday
that president Barack Obama was aware of the FBI operation before Friday's arrest.
Shapiro said Obama was assured that the FBI was in full control of the operation and that
the public was not in danger."

Then Shapiro contradicts himself by declaring: "The events of the past 24 hours
underscore the necessity of remaining vigilant against terrorism here and abroad."

The story arrives at its Kafka highpoint when President Obama thanks the FBI for its
diligence in saving us from the fake plot the FBI had fabricated.

After vacillating between whether they are reporting a real plot or a orchestrated one,
the reporters finally come down on the side of orchestration. Documents released by US
Attorney Dwight Holton "show the sting operation began in June." Obviously, the targeted
Portland teenager was not hot to trot. The FBI had to work on him for six months. The
reporters compare "the Portland sting" to the recent arrest in Virginia of Faroque Ahmed
who was ensnared in a "bombing plot that was a ruse conducted over the past six months by
federal officials."

Think about this. The FBI did a year's work in order to convince two people to
participate in fake plots.

If you are not too bright and some tough looking guys accost you and tell you that they
are Al Qaeda and expect your help in a terrorist operation, you might be afraid to say
no, or you might be thrilled to be part of a blowback against an American population that
is indifferent to their government's slaughter of people of your ethnicity in your
country of origin. Whichever way it falls, it is unlikely the ensnared person would ever
have done anything beyond talk had the FBI not organized them into action. In other cases
the FBI

entices people with money to participate in its fake plots.

Since 9/11, the only domestic "terrorist plot" that I recall that was not obviously
organized by the FBI is the "Times Square plot" to which Faisal Shahzad pleaded guilty to
trying to set off a car bomb in Manhattan. This plot, too, is suspicious. One would
think that a real terrorist would have a real bomb, not a smoke bomb.

In the May 19, 2009, online site, sott.net (reprinted Nov. 27, 2010), Joe Quinn collects
some of the fake plots, some of which were validated by torture confessions and others by
ignorant and fearful juries. The-Tortured-and-Manipulated-Terrorist-Threat-Evidence The
US government comes up with a plot, an accused, and tortures him until he confesses, or
the government fabricates a case and takes it to jurors who know that they cannot face
their neighbors if they let off a media-declared "terrorist."

Perhaps the most obvious of these cases is "the Miami seven," a hapless group of
Christian-Zionist-Muslims that called themselves the "Sea of David" and were quietly
living in a Florida warehouse awaiting biblical end times. Along came the FBI posing as
Al Qaeda and offered them $50,000 and an Al Qaeda swearing in ceremony.

The FBI told them that they needed to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago and various
government buildings. An honest reporter at Knight Ridder revealed: "The Justice (sic)
Department unveiled the arrests with an orchestrated series of news conferences in two
cities, but the severity of the charges compared with the seemingly amateurish nature of
the group raised concerns among civil libertarians," who noted that the group had "no
weapons, no explosives."

The Justice (sic) Department and tamed media made a big show out of the "militaristic
boots" worn by the hapless "plotters," but the FBI had bought the boots for them.

The biggest piece of evidence against the hapless group was that they had taken photos of
"targets" in Florida, but the US government had equipped them with cameras.

The US government even rented cars for its dupes to drive to take the pictures.

It turns out that the group only wanted the $50,000, but an American jury convicted them
anyhow.

When the US government has to go to such lengths to create "terrorists" out of hapless
people, an undeclared agenda is being served. What could this agenda be?

The answer is many agendas. One agenda is to justify wars of aggression that are war
crimes under the Nuremberg standard created by the US government itself. One way to avoid
war crimes charges is to create acts of terrorism that justify the naked aggressions
against "terrorist countries."

Another agenda is to create a police state. A police state can control people who object
to their impoverishment for the benefit of the superrich much more easily than can a
democracy endowed with constitutional civil liberties.

Another agenda is to get rich. Terror plots, whether real or orchestrated, have created a
market for security. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, former head of US Homeland
Security, is the lobbyist who represents Rapiscan, the company that manufactures the full
body porno-scanners that, following the "underwear bomber" event, are now filling up US
airports. Homeland Security has announced that they are going to purchase the
porno-scanners for trains, buses, subways, court houses, and sports events. How can
shopping malls and roads escape? Recently on Interstate 20 west of Atlanta, trucks had to
drive through a similar device. Everyone has forgotten that the underwear bomber lacked
required documents and was escorted aboard the airliner by an official.

The "war on terror" provides an opportunity for a few well-connected people to become
very rich. If they leave Americans with a third world police state, they will be living
it up in Gstaad.

This despite the fact that everyone on the planet knows that it is not lactating mothers,
children, elderly people in walkers and wheelchairs, members of Congress, members of the
military, nuns, and so on, who are members of Al Qaeda plotting to bring aboard a bomb in
their underwear, their shoes, their shampoo and face creams.

Indeed, bombs aboard air liners are a rare event.

What is it really all about? Could it be that the US government needs terrorist events in
order to completely destroy the US Constitution? On November 24, National Public Radio
broadcast a report by Dina Temple-Raston: "Administration officials are looking at the
possibility of codifying detention without trial and are awaiting legislation that is
supposed to come out of Congress early next year." Of course, the legislation will not
come out of Congress. It will be written by Homeland Security and the Justice (sic)
Department. The impotent Congress will merely rubber-stamp it.

The obliteration of habeas corpus, the most necessary and important protection of liberty
ever institutionalized in law and governing constitution, has become necessary for the US
government, because a jury might acquit an alleged or mock "terrorist" or framed person
whom the US government has declared prior to the trial will be held forever in indefinite
detention even if acquitted in a US court of law. The attorney general of the United
States has declared that any "terrorist" that he puts on trial who is acquitted by a jury
will remain in detention regardless of the verdict. Such an event would reveal the total
lawlessness of American "justice."

The United States of America, "the city upon the hill," "the light unto the world," has
become Nazi Germany. It was the practice of the Gestapo to ignore court verdicts and to
execute or hold indefinitely the cleared defendant in the camps. The Obama regime is in
the process of completing Dick Cheney's dream by legislating the legality of indefinite
detention. American law has collapsed to the dungeons of the Dark Ages.

This Nazi Gestapo policy is now the declared policy of the US Department of Justice (sic).

Anyone who thinks the United States is a free society where people have liberty, "freedom
and democracy" is uninformed.

Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President
Reagan's first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held
numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for
Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow,
Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French
President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's
Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown:
Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny
of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in
the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow's Forbes Magazine interview with
Roberts about the epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.

hangman
Acolyte
Posts: 1087

Post#2 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:52 am

That sounds like entrapment. Fabricating crimes so they can come along and solve the crime and save the day, and ride off in to the sunset. Well, hell, the American has certainly fallen for these scams plenty of times.

I think it's main intent was to secure even more funding from taxpayers.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests