Latest Hoffman piece - Book Sets Off Debate in Germany

Illegal Immigration needs to be stamped out now. Repatriation of illegals to their country of ORIGEN needs to happen now. Support Chris Simcox and the Minutemen Projects coming to a border state near you.

also ... This is our payback for listening to the governmental WHORES who said that NAFTA/WTO/GATT were 'good' for America and Jobs. All there has been is a GIANT SUCKING SOUND of Jobs leaving this country. This spot is to recognize the companies that are traitors to the US economy and the traitors in Government that have allowed this to happen
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Latest Hoffman piece - Book Sets Off Debate in Germany

Post#1 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:09 pm

Whitey needs to stop listening to kabbalah-pop culture and stop aborting their kids. The white race in Amerika is killing their children 4 times faster then any other group. ITS called self centered selfishness.

Book Sets Off Debate in Germany

The Hoffman Wire
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor.



The right wingers will love German banker Thilo Sarrazin and his book.
They will imagine that he has the answer and is making sense. Something
like his kind of talk echoes throughout Europe, Canada and the United

But it is nearly meaningless. It is safety valve venting.

Demographics is power. In the land of Clausewitz people should know
this. Demographics is a form of power politics. Editorials and books can
be inspiring or stirring to read. Perhaps even some whining is okay too,
given the sight of Germany sinking beneath the waves of immigration.

Contemplate the last sentence of the NY Times article below, however.
The last sentence nails it.

The whites are doing nothing about this. They will not stir themselves
to fertility, so they whine. People think I am concerned about this
because I am a Christian. Apparently they know nothing about
pre-Christian religion in Europe, which was one giant working for
fertility. The woman with the most children was like a lucky charm in
those days. Women would touch her for luck. Men would be intensely
attracted to her. This is what Aristotle called natural law.

Europe with its organic food and artisan cheese, wind power and electric
cars is fantastically artificial. American and European women poison
their bodies with artificial birth control pills for most of their
reproductive lives. When the chemical pills fail, they abort.

The Muslims in Europe fill a demographic void, just as do the Mexicans
of the American southwest. White nationalists get angry at these two
groups instead of getting angry with themselves. Say what you want about
a crazy, fanatical Islamic religion, it is sufficiently natural to
engender large families. The white race is not.

I don’t believe in Darwinism but those among you who do should have a
ready answer to this dilemma. The white race is not fit enough to
survive. So don’t scapegoat Muslims and Mexicans. White men and women
who are too selfish, greedy and enervated to have many children are the
dregs of history, no matter how advanced is their technology or how
clean their streets.

One does not have to be a prophet to see the future of Europe. In
America the picture is slightly brighter because it is a vast continent
and there are some pockets of demographic health, such as among LDS
(“Mormons”), traditional Catholics and other conservative Christians.
Here in Idaho I would estimate that the average white family size is
three children among younger couples, and four children among older
ones. Both figures are of course sufficient to maintain population
growth. People are healthier in Idaho, and you can quote me. But Idaho
is not representative of mainstream America.

I often get hectored by sterile anti-Christian whites who say I am too
mystical or too pious. Actually, as an old-school German-American I am
very practical. They are the ones who are mystics. They imagine that if
they somehow expel millions of immigrants they will have their white
nation back. This is cargo cult thinking. Since the 1960s we have become
the first white people in history to no longer have sufficient vitality
to have at least three or four children per completed family size. If
we can’t fix that, then it’s all over except the shoutin’.

I’m very much for border control, but it is not the panacea that some
think it is. It is so much easier to target the immigrants than to raise
a family of your own of the number your great-grandparents raised. In
Holland, where there is a large and vociferous anti-immigration party,
they euthanize their elderly at the first opportunity and abort their
own infants at will. Does anyone think a thanatos culture like that will
stand against the Islamic nations whose populations are mostly under the
age of 15?

Realpolitik begins in the maternity ward. Accept no substitutes.

—Michael Hoffman


Book Sets Off Immigration Debate in Germany

By Michael Slackman
New York Times | September 2, 2010

BERLIN — When a German banker and former government official spoke
publicly about a unique “Jewish gene,” when he attacked Islam as a
source of violence and stunted development and when he espoused genetic
theories that evoked the fright of the Nazi past, the political
leadership here quickly condemned him as racist and called for him to be

But the banker, Thilo Sarrazin, an executive with the central bank and a
former Berlin finance minister, has not emerged as the marginalized
hate-monger that the initial condemnation suggested. His book, “Germany
Does Away With Itself,” which laments the growing number of Muslim
immigrants, contending that they are “dumbing down” society, was
released Monday and is already in its fourth printing, with sales
expected to exceed 150,000 copies, according to his publisher.

Mr. Sarrazin has set off a painful public discussion here that
highlights one of the nation’s most vexing challenges: how to overcome
what is widely seen as a failed immigration policy that over decades has
done little to support and integrate the nearly 20 percent of the
population with an immigrant background. It is a policy that also stokes
anti-Islamic sentiment and hostility.

The sensation of Mr. Sarrazin’s book and his unrepentant posture have
also provoked something less tangible, but perhaps more troublesome for
policy makers here eager to keep the radical right from gaining a
foothold as they have in other parts of Europe. Under the cover of
speaking truth to power, Mr. Sarrazin has tried to legitimize hate
speech, his critics say.

One of the most telling signs of the growing distance between native
Germans and immigrants, officials say, is the observation that the
grandchildren of immigrants are less likely to integrate into German
society and less likely to apply for citizenship compared with members
of previous generations, creating an ethnic underclass in education and
employment. Residents from immigrant families are twice as likely as
other Germans to be unemployed.

“This issue is now more important for Germany than the economy,” said
Wolfgang Nowak, former senior adviser to the previous chancellor,
Gerhard Schröder, and the head of Deutsche Bank’s International Forum.
Mr. Nowak argues that Mr. Sarrazin has done his country a favor by
forcing the topic to the top of the political agenda and crashing
through the barriers of political correctness.

“The condemnation of his book is an automatic reflex of a generation
raised after Hitler,” he said. Even some who found his approach
offensive said that Mr. Sarrazin had “addressed a problem that will
remain long after the waves of outrage have subsided: the enormous
integration deficit of the Muslim minority in Germany, or at least of
disturbingly large parts of it,” said an article in the center-left
newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung.

In a newspaper interview published the day before the book was released,
Mr. Sarrazin also spoke of a Jewish gene, a reference to recent studies
showing that Jews share many genes inherited from the ancestral
population that lived in the Middle East long ago. He was criticized by
everyone, including the chancellor, Angela Merkel.

His party wants to kick him out, and the bank is considering firing him.
On Thursday, the board of the bank voted to ask Germany’s president to
dismiss Mr. Sarrazin from the board, and Mrs. Merkel applauded the

Mr. Sarrazin’s stance, and the traction it has gained, has alarmed many,
in part because he is not a member of the extreme right but a longtime
member of the center-left Social Democrats and the former top financial
official for the city of Berlin, one of the centers of the immigrant

“If he were an extremist, no one would pay attention,” said Hatice
Akyün, a writer who has debated Mr. Sarrazin and condemned his theories
of the innate inferiority of immigrants. “He is a Social Democrat. You
cannot do what he is doing, not in this country. You cannot give this
kind of thinking a democratic base.”

Ms. Akyün, whose father came to Germany from Turkey in 1969 to work as a
miner, said that the debate often came down to the difference between
integration, which she said immigrants and their families accept, even
desire, and assimilation, which they reject.

Maxim Biller, whose family moved to Germany from Prague when he was a
child, said, “The only chance for acceptance in German society is total
assimilation, don’t hold onto our traditions.
Mr. Sarrazin, who wears small, round glasses and has a stern face topped
by a shock of mostly white hair, said that he wanted to highlight what
he described as the drain on Germany by an immigrant class.

In his book, he criticized Islam and blamed Muslim immigrants for
refusing to integrate. He also blamed Germany for being too generous
with its social benefits, which he said attracted immigrants looking for
handouts. “No other religion in Europe is so demanding and no other
migration group depends so much on the social welfare state and is so
much connected to criminality,” he wrote in one passage.

Germany has had a difficult time coming to terms with its immigrant
population. Next year will be the 50th anniversary of the guest-worker
program for migrants, mostly Turks. Originally, the plan was for the
workers to return, though that idea evaporated in the 1970s when Germany
allowed workers’ families to move here, said Gunter Piening, an official
who deals with integration and migration issues for Berlin.

“The German philosophy was, ‘We are not a migration country,’ ” he said.
“There were migrants, but there was no migrant policy.”

It was only in 2005 that Germany acknowledged that it had become a
destination country, a shift that was not accompanied by a practical
plan, Mr. Piening said. That has slowly begun to change, he said.

Recently, for example, Berlin revamped its secondary education system
because it recognized that children of immigrants were “getting an
education which was good for nothing, a dead end.” Steps have been taken
to also allow Muslims to be buried without coffins — the custom for
Muslims is to be wrapped in a shroud — a small measure if ultimately
adopted, but one that would nonetheless help make Muslims feel more
welcome, Mr. Piening said.

It is not, however, entirely benevolent as German officials recognize
that they will need immigrants in coming years. According to a recent
survey by the German Chambers of Industry and Commerce there will be six
million fewer Germans of working age by 2030.


The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:

Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.

Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest