8 is the number of Revisionists kidnapped 4 holohaux crimes

Post Freedom Fighters Penal Addresses, their stories and travails contact information. As long as our Feddies are acting like criminals and jailing good people, this board will EXIST
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

8 is the number of Revisionists kidnapped 4 holohaux crimes

Post#1 » Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:06 am

Bookmark this page to keep current with all of their trials and travails...
I am sure the list will grow longer... Also at the bottom of this thread is a video about this travesty..
As of 12.21.5 here are 4 of the victims current addresses:
Anschriften für Grußkarten zum Tag der Menschenrechte und zum Weihnachtsfest:

1) Germar Rudolf, JVA Stammheim - Asperger-Str. 60 D-70439 Stuttgart , Germany

2) Ernst Zündel, JVA Mannheim, Herzogenrieder Str.111, D-68169 Mannheim , Germany

3) David Irving, Justizanstalt Wien-Josefstadt, Wickenburggasse 18-20, A-1080 Wien Austria

4) Siegfried Verbeke #207 J.V.A. Oberer Fauler Felz 1 D-69117 Heidelberg , Germany

Ernst Zundel Update

David Irving Update
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpos ... tcount=162

Germar Rudolf Update
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissen ... tained.htm

Bruno Gollnisch Update

Siegfreid Verbeke Update
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22 ... &scoring=d

Siegfried Lorber Update
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2 ... UTF-8&sa=N

Günter Deckert Update

Brad Love Update
http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl= ... a=N&tab=nw

New Video: 'Freedom' http://www.nationalvanguard.org/docs/vi ... hought.wmv
Por FREE ZUNDEL NOW - Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2005 at 11:35 PM

It's fantastic to see that a country the size of Spain can muster 100 patriots who will rally for Free Speech and protest the jailing of David Irving and Ernst Zundel.

Freedom of speech and inquiry are the most important rights any of us have.

Freedom of speech is the basis for all rights, it is the cornerstone of ALL other freedoms, freedom of speech is the ESSENTIAL human right because without freedom of speech you can't know if there are violations that are being perpetrated against your other rights.

What is pathetic is that Americans and Canadians could only assemble, at best, 30 patriots for our Free Speech demonstrations for Ernst Zundel --

Below is a moving video on this important topic:

New Video: 'Freedom'
A moving tribute to the men who
face prison for being dedicated
to the truth. By Michael Medeiros
Download Video (2minutes long)

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Is Toben at it again? Revisionist Conference In Iran

Post#2 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:35 am

Is Toben at it again? Revisionist Conference In Iran - if possible, yes! Freedom means to live for the truth. Nothing else. Germar Rudolf"s Lectures on the Holocaust
2 unnamed text/html 46.24 KB

Google Alert for: Fredrick Toben

Israel was built on a lie: Adelaide Institute director
MehrNews.com - Tehran,Iran
TEHRAN, Dec. 28 (MNA) -- Fredrick Toben, the director of the Adelaide Institute in Australia, believes that Israel was created based on the Holocaust myth. ...

http://tehrantimes.com/Description.asp? ... =2&Num=003

Google Alert for: Germar Rudolf

Holocaust Day and the 6 Million Lie
PHXNews - Phoenix,AZ,USA
... So, why are men like David Irving, Ernst Zundel, Dr. Germar Rudolf, Bruno Gollnisch, and others now facing charges in prison for saying 6 million didn't die?

Google Alert for: Ernst Zundel

Apple to Zundel, the year in tech law
Toronto Star - Canada
... villages. Z is for Ernst Zundel, who was deported to Germany in February following a lengthy battle over Internet hate content. Michael ...

Google Alert for: David Irving
THE DISPUTATION: Our Role in Promoting Holocaust Denial
Forward - New York,NY,USA
By david klinghoffer. Last month, British historian David Irving was arrested in Austria for the crime of denying the Holocaust. ...

Google Alert for: Mordechai Vanunu

The Dishonest Reporter 'Award' 2005
Honestreporting.com - New York,NY,USA
... 8. In March, the BBC apologized to Israel for reporter Simon Wilson's handling of an interview with Mordechai Vanunu. A former technician ...

John Demjanjuk


Google Alert for: Charles Zentai

SOS - Alleged war criminal denies involvement in murder of Jewish ...
ABC Online - Australia
... man. Charles Zentai, an Australian citizen living in Perth, has been accused of carrying out the murder in Budapest in 1944. Mr ...

Google Alert for: David Hicks

British court rules Guantánamo detainee David Hicks entitled to ...
Asian Tribune - Bangkok,Thailand
In a politically embarrassing decision for the Australian government, a British High Court has ruled that Australian citizen David Hicks, who has been ...
See all stories on this topic

British to appeal Hicks decision
NEWS.com.au - Australia
THE British Government is appealing against a High Court ruling granting citizenship to Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks, according to the Home ...
See all stories on this topic

Hicks's father upbeat despite UK appeal
ABC Online - Australia
The father of Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks says he remains hopeful that British citizenship will be his son's ticket out, despite an appeal ...



From: Horst Mahler [mailto:hm@horst-mahler.de ]
Sent: Friday, 30 December 2005 7:39 AM

Dear Robert Faurisson,

I disagree. The conference should be held under any circumstances. The incarceration of Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, David Irving, Siegfried Verbeke e.a. is not a blow to revisionism but to the holocaustreligion. Before these events revisionism was in a deep crisis. All the facts that dismantle the Big Lie are reported in hundreds of articels and books. Germar Rudolf summarized the findings of the revisionists. There is nothing more to be done on this field. Now it is time to go to jail for the truth.

Robert , do You remember Your words You’ve shouted when we said goodby in Vichy:? „Auf ins Gefängnis!“ („Let’s go to jail!“) The truth is the weapon to destroy Yewish supremacy. And this will change the world and save the mankind. But the truth never wins without these human beings who are ready to die for the truth.

The question for the human race now is wheter there are enough of those human beings to rescue the poeples from Yahwe.

Thousands of moslems are ready to die for Allah. This is no option for us Europeans. Europe is the continent of freedom. Freedom means to live for the truth. Nothing else.

Imagine! The leading and well known revisionists are invited by the Iranien Head of State to participate in a scientific conference of historians to discuss the Holocaust. The invited persons join in a declaration in advance that they know the risk of being kidnapped on their journey but will go to Teheran anyway. If these persons are then picked up because of delivery orders from Israel or their vasalls, the fight to free the revisionists becomes a worldaffair. This is – after having said in Your writings what has to be said – the maximum You can achieve for mankind.

Maybe the Jews will kill us. So what? Robert - come on!

Sincerily Yours

Horst Mahler


Revisionism in Iran, in France and in the World

With his recent statements on "the myth of the Holocaust", the president of Iran has given new momentum to the development of historical revisionism, as is made plain by the following exchange between the Managing Director of the Neda Institute of Political Sciences (Teheran) and the Frenchman Robert Faurisson.

Dr Jawad Sharbaf, Managing Director, Neda Institute of Political Sciences (Teheran)
to Professor Robert Faurisson, December 19, 2005

Dear Professor Faurisson

I take this opportunity to express Neda Institute of Scientific-Political Research and Studies' deep sorrow to you and all revisionists regarding the UN resolution on "Holocaust Day" [of November 1, 2005]. President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's recent remarks doubting the "Holocaust" have created a favourable situation for revisionism. Our assumption for the time being is that the President will undoubtedly do his best if you make contact and request assistance for organising an international conference on revisionism. Should you require any help in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me.

With the best of good wishes,
Dr Jawad Sharbaf, Managing Director, Neda Institute

Professor Robert Faurisson to Dr Jawad Sharbaf, December 26, 2005

Dear Dr Sharbaf,

I heartily thank you for your message and your proposal concerning the organisation of an international revisionist conference. In November of 2000 I had the honour of being a guest for a week in Teheran at the invitation of an Iranian government agency. On that occasion, I made the acquaintance of your Institute where I was welcomed by Dr Soroush-Nejad and a group of professors, one of whom was then finishing the Persian translation of my Mémoire en défense contre ceux qui m'accusent de falsifier l'histoire (1980). For these last five years, during which we have maintained contact, I have noted that your country's political heads have been reluctant to denounce the lie of the alleged "Holocaust" of the Jews, a lie whose ravages, wrought for more than half a century now, and to the particular detriment of the Palestinian people, are a disaster that worsens from year to year. I was hoping that one day a high government official would have the courage to put it plainly to the world that that "Holocaust" was but a legend or a myth. On December 8, 2005, - a date that will be remembered - the President of your country, Mr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, - a name that will go down in history - dared to voice doubts on the historical reality of the alleged "Holocaust". On December 12, he spoke of it as a "myth". Moreover, he spoke in defence of the revisionists' right to express themselves freely. On December 22, in Egypt, the general guide of the Moslem Brothers, Mohamed Mehdi Akef, also used the word "myth" in that regard but not without retracting in part two days later, potent and intimidating as that myth is. On December 23, an Iranian official, Mohamed-Ali Ramin, head of the association for the defence of the rights of Moslem minorities in the West, declared that your President wished to see the European governments let academics in their countries publish the results of their research into the "Holocaust".

On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 countries constituting the UN adopted an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th "International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust". Moreover, this text "Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part". Thus are targeted all those who, like the revisionists, demand a re-examination of the evidence and testimonies on which the argument of the alleged "Holocaust" of the Jews is based. In the main, the upholders of that argument affirm that, during the Second World War, the Germans 1) had a policy of physical extermination of the Jews; 2) had designed, built and used great slaughterhouses for humans called gas chambers (not to be confused with the crematory ovens, which had nothing criminal about them) and 3) caused, by this means and others, the death of six million Jews.

The proposition was adopted through a sleight of hand that I have described in a text of which you are aware entitled "The UN Decides a Universal Ban on Revisionism".

The accusation brought by the Jews against the German people constitutes a slander. Marked with the sign of Cain, that people has thus far had no other recourse than to lose itself in contrition for a crime that it never committed. Sixty years after the war, Germany is still in a state of subjection and has not yet had the right to a peace treaty. The German (and Austrian) leaders ceaselessly ask the Jews' forgiveness and lay out colossal financial "reparations" to Jewish or Zionist organisations and the State of Israel. For sixty years, those countries' rulers have lived in dread of arousing the Jews' wrath; consequently they can be seen stifling any sign of historical revisionism. In Germany, in Austria but also in a good many other countries in Europe, the Jews have succeeded in getting special laws passed serving to protect their own version of the history of the Second World War from any challenge.

The imposture of the "Holocaust" is the sword and shield of the Jewish State, its no. 1 weapon. It enables the Jews and Zionists to indict the whole world: first Germany which, according to it, committed an abominable and unprecedented crime, then the rest of the world which had let that crime be committed. The Jewish extremists and the Zionists have gone on to charge Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman, Stalin, De Gaulle, Pope Pius XII, the International Committee of the Red Cross as well as all the countries that took part in the Second World War and even all the neutral countries, beginning with Switzerland. All are accused of having been indifferent to the tragedy and of having let the Jewish people be exterminated as alleged!

So it is that in taking a position today against the lie of the "Holocaust", Iran happens to be defending not only Palestine and the Arabo-Moslem world but also an entire part of the human race against a gigantic slander, blackmail and extortion operation.

You inform me that, thanks to President Ahmadinejad, the occasion may finally have arisen to envisage the holding of an international conference on revisionism.

You surely know that the revisionists were, in 2001, preparing to hold such a conference in Beirut from March 31 to April 2 of that year. But Israeli and American pressures became so threatening that Lebanese President Rafik Hariri had to forbid the gathering. We should therefore be happy to turn to President Ahmadinejad and request his help in holding a conference in your country. However, in view of the circumstances, such a project seems, sad to say, unrealisable at this moment. Allow me to explain why.
At present the main revisionists who, in 2001, would have participated in the Beirut conference are either in prison, in exile or in a precarious situation that forbids them from crossing national borders and from boarding a flight at an international airport.

We may take the appalling case of Ernst Zündel. Married to an American lady and living peacefully in the State of Tennessee, he was arrested outside his house on February 5, 2003 and thrown in jail under a pretext made of lies. Then he was delivered to Canada where, for two years, he languished in degrading conditions of solitary confinement in a high-security prison. Finally, he was handed over to Germany, where he is now in prison (in Mannheim) awaiting trial for revisionism. In Canada, as in Germany, revisionists are deprived of the right to defend themselves. In those countries, when a man accused of revisionism stands before a judge, the latter begins, in line with the routine, by having him swear to tell the truth. But if, in the following minute, the accused says, for example: "I affirm that the alleged Nazi gas chambers did not exist because the truth - which I can well demonstrate - is that they could not exist", the judge will interrupt him immediately. The Canadian judge will tell him: "Before this special court [christened 'Human rights tribunal'] truth is no defence". As for the German judge, he will tell him: "You have not the right to challenge obvious facts of common knowledge ('offenkundig')". Thus neither the revisionist in question nor his lawyers can present a defence on the merits of the case. In Canada, judge Pierre Blais, presiding alone without a jury over proceedings against Ernst Zündel admitting of no appeal, the special court went so far as to examine anonymous witnesses in closed session. Then, in Mannheim, the chief judge dismissed in succession the four lawyers whom Ernst Zündel had chosen, and this because he suspected them of revisionism.

Still in the United States, near Chicago, the German citizen Germar Rudolf was recently kidnapped in the same style, torn from his American wife and their child and delivered to Germany; he is in prison in Stuttgart.

The Belgian Siegfried Verbeke was arrested last summer at Amsterdam airport and handed over by the Netherlands to Germany; he is in prison in Heidelberg.

The British historian David Irving was arrested in November while travelling in Austria and is now in prison in Vienna.

These four persons risk being sentenced to years of imprisonment, except perhaps David Irving if, as his lawyer lets it be understood that he will do, he retracts, shows repentance and pleads for the court's leniency.

Other revisionists are in prison in Germany or Austria, notably the barrister Manfred Roeder, the school headmaster Ernst G. Kögel and the chemist Wolfgang Fröhlich.

Germany has become Israel's "Guantanamo Bay" by the intermediary of a sort of judicial and police mafia which, in the United States and Canada, lashes out at revisionists (and at certain Arabs or Moslems) within the so convenient framework of the "fight against terrorism".

In Switzerland the revisionists Gaston-Armand Amaudruz (aged 84) and René-Louis Berclaz have recently got out of prison, but might well return there.

Some important revisionists are living in exile in difficult conditions. I shall refrain here from naming either them or the countries where they have found refuge.

There remains the case of those revisionists who are neither in prison nor in exile. Their existence is hardly more enviable. The police harass them, the courts convict them. To speak only of France, Jean Plantin (prosecuted in Lyon), Vincent Reynouard (prosecuted in Limoges) and Georges Theil (prosecuted in Grenoble, Limoges and Lyon) have been or are currently under diverse sentences, including that of imprisonment without remission. Bruno Gollnisch, member of the European parliament, is to be summoned before a court in Lyon simply for having said that he wished historians could express themselves freely on the problem of the Nazi gas chambers' existence! I myself am to appear on June 20, 2006 at the 17th chamber of the Paris criminal court for having given a telephone interview of revisionist substance to the Iranian television channel "Sahar"; charges were brought by Mr Dominique Baudis, president of the Conseil Supérieur de l'audiovisuel.

Fredrick Töben, an Australian national of German origin, had developed his revisionist activity in Australia and on the Internet. While travelling in Germany and seeking to inquire at the source about judicial repression of revisionism in that country, he soon found himself in prison there. Now back in Australia, he has been hit with a "gag order", that is, he is in principle bound to silence on pain of summary conviction for contempt of court.

In Poland, the Czech republic, and other countries of Europe, revisionists are also prosecuted and convicted.

In Sweden, Ahmed Rami carries on with indomitable courage a struggle for both Islam and revisionism which has earned him time in prison.

In Germany, the number of publications burned by the police because of revisionism is not officially known but it might be considerable. Likewise in Canada.

I shall not relate here the revisionists' exclusions from professions of all sorts in various countries or the family tragedies and suicides provoked by the repression. In Munich on the 25th of April 1995 the revisionist Reinhold Elstner burned himself to death as a protest, as he had written, against "the Niagara of lies" poured upon his people. The mainstream German press passed his heroic act over in silence and the police there, doing as ordered, confiscated the bouquets of flowers laid at the site of that sacrifice and proceeded to question those who, by that gesture of compassion, had shown their own anguish. In France, armed Jewish groups use violence with impunity even in the halls of the central courthouse in Paris. Personally, between 1978 and 1993, I suffered ten physical assaults on the part of Jews who, however, were never tried.

If the Jews and Zionists use physical violence and judicial repression in this way, it is because, on the level of scientific and historical argumentation, the revisionists have beaten them hands down. The drama of it for the Jews and Zionists is that they have been lying and that this fact is becoming known more and more. Certain Jews and even certain Israelis seem to be conscious of this. A minute few have had the courage to declare their scepticism concerning the reality of the "Holocaust" whereas others have been content to speak out against "the Holocaust religion", "the Holocaust industry" or the "Shoah business".

In conclusion, I think that, until things have changed somewhat, an international conference is, unfortunately, impossible. But, in accord with an idea put forth by professor Arthur Robert Butz, I shall say that we hope to see President Ahmadinejad create in Iran an international centre for revisionist studies whose first task would be to propagate historical revisionism's attainments in the Arabo-Moslem world via the Internet or any other medium. Meanwhile, we request that Iran make repeated appeals to the Western world for the freeing of our prisoners of conscience.

In any case, we for our part consider that as long as in the United States, Canada, nearly all of Europe and as far away as Australia the revisionists are subjected either to special laws or tribunals, underhanded police procedures, or methodical vilification by media in the service of certain Jewish or Zionist pressure groups, the Western world will have ever less right to impose lessons of lawfulness, morality or democracy on others.

Yours respectfully,

Robert Faurisson


GERMAR RUDOLF: Lectures on the Holocaust

From: RePorterNoteBook@aol.com [mailto:RePorterNoteBook@aol.com]

Sent: Friday, 30 December 2005 7:26 AM

Subject: Holocaust Remarks of Iran President Reflect Official State View


Holocaust Remarks of Iran President Reflect Official State View

http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?c ... 7640&par=0

Iran's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Friday that remarks made earlier this week by the country's president that the Nazi mass murder of Jews during World War II was a "myth" was the official Iranian government's position on the issue. "The words of [president] Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the Holocaust and on Israel are not personal opinions, nor isolated statements but they express the view of the [Iranian] government," Mottaki said. Ahmadinejad made the Holocaust remarks on Wednesday while it was in October he said Israel should be "wiped off the map."

"The Europeans have to understand that the current Iranian government doesn't have any intention to play the role of someone who listens without having the right to reply," he said adding that if Europe wants to have relations with Iran "it has to learn to listen to our opinions and take them into account."



Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15:

Item No. 29:

Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust. Controversial Issues Cross Examined

In 1976, Holocaust revisionism produced its last "standard work," if there ever was such a thing: Prof. A.R. Butz' Hoax of the Twentieth Century. "How can a quarter century old text not be obsolete today?" Butz asks in the preface of the 2003 edition of his own book, pointing out "the age of this text, and the great advances that have subsequently occurred in Holocaust revisionism."

Hence, there is a great need for a new, integrated work summarizing Holocaust revisionism after 30 years of very intensive and thorough research.

And here it is, the new standard work of Holocaust revisionism! It was written by German scholar, writer, and publisher Germar Rudolf, based on the research of the most prominent revisionists, most of which Rudolf had the pleasure to publish in a multitude of German and English language journals and books over the past 15 years.

The book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years, needs this book!

Since 1992, Rudolf has been giving lectures to various mainstream audiences all over the world. His topic is very controversial: the Holocaust in the light of new forensic and historical findings. His listeners initially think they know exactly what "the Holocaust" is all about, but their world view is completely turned upside down after the evidence is presented. Even though Rudolf p resents nothing short of full-fledged Holocaust revisionism, his arguments fall on fertile soil, because they are presented in a very pedagogically sensitive and scholarly way. This book is the literary version of Rudolf's lectures, enriched with the most recent finding of historiography to a topic regulated by penal law in many countries.

The book's style is unique as is its topic: It is a dialogue between the lecturers on the one hand who introduce the reader to the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust Revisionism, and the reactions of the audience on the other hand: supportive, skeptical, and also hostile comments, questions, and assertions. The Lectures read like a vivid and exciting real-life exchange between persons of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudoscientific arguments against revisionism are all addressed and refuted.

This book is a compendium of Frequently Asked Questions on the Holocaust and its critical reexamination. With more than 1,300 references to sources and a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic both for readers unfamiliar with revisionism and for those wanting to know more.

US $30.00 568 pp. ., 6"x9", pb., ill., bibl., index (Aug. 2005) , ISBN:

1591480019 , ISSN: 1529-7748

* You can place your order by:

* E-mail: RePorterNoteBook@aol.com and we will bill you...

* Phone (normal business hours): 212-787-7891

* Mail: Castle Hill Publishers, 253 West 72nd street Suite 1711, New York, NY, 10023

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Exciting news from Jürgen Graf

Post#3 » Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:07 pm

From Japan: An example of literal and figurative language use - don't be offended, now! - and exciting news from Jürgen Graf

From: tkuh50@tku.ac.jp [mailto:tkuh50@tku.ac.jp]
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 10:16 PM

Subject: Mini-essays 12 and 13

I had fun writing it. Fun in the Russian sense of "Laughter through tears."

12. "Elite Jewry's Treason, Fraud, Bigotry, Media Lies All "A" OK!"

A shocking development in the on-going Jews' war against the cattle-goyim occurred recently as an unexpectedly broad coalition of Gentile groups took a major step toward appeasement, i.e. granting elite Jewry whatever it wants. The coalition issued a joint statement entitled, well, you guessed it! No need to repeat! It's this mini-essay's title.

Archbishop Jean "Foxy" Fuchsiger, the Jewish Roman Catholic prelate and former Awshucks camper, took the lead in pushing the sclerotic Vatican bureaucracy to get the coalition going. Pope Benedict Arnold, who had earlier written a screed arguing that Judaism is just as good as Christianity, commented, "What's good for the Jews is good for the Gentiles." Privately the pope expressed the hope that his efforts would take the heat off the Vatican and ease the relentless joosmedia obsession with homosexual priests.

Several non-zionized mainstream Protestant denominations that had earlier decided to disinvest all funds out of Israeli-based securities have apologized for their previous terrible auntie-semenist statements, e.g. "Israel is a Jewish state," "Judaism is rather an ethnic tribal religion," etc. Instead they announced full reinvestment and that much church property will be sold off to get quick cash flowing to Israel. The Episcopalian and Presbyterian leaders asked rabbis to consider removing from their scriptures Talmud passages about Jesus boiling away in hell in donkey semen. The rabbis patiently and carefully explained that Jesus is not necessarily boiling in DONKEY semen and that whatever hellish torments he is undergoing is due to his habitual buggery. The pastors apologized for not knowing that Jesus enjoyed sex with animals and expressed regret at having even raised the issue. The Protestant leaders admitted that Talmud references to Jesus' mother as a whore and bestialistess a re of no concern to them because Mary is unimportant in their theology. They added, "Let the Roman Catholics and Orthodox bitch about that."

The leaders of the old KKK wanted to participate but they said their organization is moribund and has been virtually replaced by the more competitive neo-KKK [Krazy Kike Kowards]. They did express admiration [or perhaps exasperation] over the astounding successes of Jewish chicken hawks like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Henry Kissinger, etc. at getting gullible goyim to die for Israel. But they did note that America's wars for Israel have provided lots of jobs in the cannon fodder ranks of the military and in the funeral industry.

Most surprisingly, the American Bankers Association issued a preemptive addendum to the joint declaration in which they announced a $240,000,000,000 [That's right! Can you say "billion?"] advance fund to compensate any possible holocaust victims whose deposits just might have been kept secret from just anyone at all. Ivan Boesky, their spokesmouth, said, "Hey, it's only $40,000 per holocaust victim. We can't weather the shit storm that hit the Swiss banks." Apparently the prudent bankers had been forewarned by Norman Finkelstein who suggested in his scandously famous book that elite Jewry might just target the American banks after their stunning and easy success in shaking down the staid Swiss, e.g. like taking candy from a baby.

The "Gentile Mothers of the American Veterans of Jewish Wars" insisted on being included because they wanted to show how proud they are that their sons and a few stray daughters died fighting for whatever and wherever Israel wanted them to die for. Their spokesmother was outraged at the big to-do over the woman who demonstrated in front of Baby Bush's ranch. They asked that her name not be mentioned less knowledge of that black mark on American patriotism become widely known. The spokesmother stated, "That frigging filthy hag said her son died fighting for Israel! Of course, everybody with a working brain knows that! But she should shove her perverted anger up an anatomical aperture of her own choosing. We are happy and proud of the sacrifice our children made for whatever it was."

Dissident members from the National Education Association [NEA] formed a group called "Cattle-Goyim for HYPE [Holocaust Year Program of Education] They demanded that the German government annually incarcerate 25% of their high school graduates. Debbie Lippy, their spokesmouth, said that young Krauts do not really believe in their heart of hearts that the holocaust is God's awful truth. She added that only a complete holocaustification of USA education can prevent that from happening here in the Land of the Freak and the Home of the Knave.

A committee from the NAACP co-signed the coalition's statment and issued a separate explanatory press release, "Our organization was founded by Jews and so we know the cardinal importance of sucking up to elite Jewry. We do not want the joosmedia ragging on about pedophile bible-belt preachers, now do we? Besides, the ADL [America's Defamation League] asked us to protest the outrageous statement of some American Jewish activist who said, 'American Blacks live on an invisible plantation managed by Jews.' That's bullshit! We do not live on any Southern plantation. We wish we did! However, we have to live in the deep freeze of deindustrialized Motown."

The Whore House telegrammed an apology for forcing Jonathan Pollard to steal top secret national security documents and pass them onto Israel and eventually onto the Soviet Onion. Baby Bushit explained that if the then chief executive had made all secrets available to Israel just like he did for the CIA and the FBI, there would have been absolutely no need for Pollard to fulfill his patriotic duty by stealing them. The Whore House also apologized for mistakenly insisting that the USS Liberty was an America naval vessel. Bushboy explained that patrician auntie-semenites in the navy had deceitfully passed off an Egyptian fishing boast as an intelligence gathering naval ship.

Congress apologized to AIPAC, the Israel Cabinet, and to anyone who gave a rat's rectum for having hindered full and free relationships between Israel and the deep pockets of the oh! so very generous American taxpayer, the sucker of last resort. The Senate and the House passed a joint resolution dissolving the entire legislative branch and transferring law-making authority to the Israeli Knesset. Toady Kennedy fulminated, "Congress has just been an extra useless bureaucratic layer between the Israeli government and the endless supply of cash that our only friend in the Middle East so urgently needs from us. It is none of our business to explain to Israel just how it should be spending our money. Let's get the American government off the the backs of the Israel people."

The Association of Federal Prosecutors recommended that special legislation be passed criminalizing holocaut revision, denial, scepticism, smirking, unsupervised study, whatever. In addition, criminal liability would be imposed for mentioning anything that anyone might construe as auntie-Semenism or offensive to the feelings of anyone claiming to be a holocaust victim. Examples of forbidden topics include: the attack on the USS Liberty, the assassinations of JFK, RFK, JFK2, et alia.

Furthermore, anyone applying for a US passport would have to take a holocaust test and loyalty oath swearing to uphold whatever holocaust fable Israel's Vad Yashim might be peddling at the moment, e.g. Jews into soap, Jew into lampshades, Jews into wallpaper, whatever. The prosecutors did not want naive Americans traveling around HOE [Holocaust Obsessed Europe] and shooting their mouths off about freedom of speech and ending up for 8-10 years in a German slammer. Any American who does jail time should be doing it in Prison Planet:USA.

Many White nationalist groups co-signed the document and added separate apologies for having resisted Jewish Supremacy. David Duck, a prominent leader, apologized for his efforts at defending white cattle-goyim against the divine right of Jews to rule over the universe. He groveled, "Hey, man! I'm just a hick from the sticks and foolishly thought the UAssA was an independent country based on the Enlightenment values and the Bill of Rights. I now understand the Talmud viewpoint that Gentiles exist for the welfare of Jews"

Our reporter contacted the ADL [Antsy Defecation League: John Bryant's neologism ] and spoke to Abe Fox who said the document was no big surprise to him and that his moles throughout the above organizations had actually crafted most of the language. Abe said he saw the document only as an interim step toward the dissolution of all Gentile religions. He argued that Noabite law does not permit Gentiles to have religions because most religions teach dangerous thoughts like universal human equality, respect for fellow humans, Golden Rule. He added that Holocaustianity was specially designed as a surrogate religion for the goyim and that it would show outrageous ingratitude on the part of Gentiles to maintain their outdated dogmas now that Jews had cooked up the Church of the Holocaust for them. However, he hastened to add that he will insist that the document be translated into Latin and issued by the Vatican as papal bull in order to assist in the transition to the full Noabite monopol y for the Church of the Holocaust.

Further details on other aspects of this historic document can be learned from any public appearance by Baby Bushboy and his puppeteer-managers in and out of government.


13. Barry Chamish's Anti-Semitistic Zionism

Chamish's Zionism is very similar to Rabbi Meir Kahane's Judaism and both gentlemen represent a clear and present danger to Semitism [Jewish Supremacy]. Among the Jewish people there seem to be mainly these three ideologies: Judaism, Semitism, and Zionism. It might well be that some individual Jews consider themselves to be simultaneously Judaists, Semistists, and Zionists, but for present purposes it is best to think in terms of separate ideal types in order to emphasize the differences.

JUDAISM is a religion. Unfortunately, it is not a very religious religion because it contains lots of genocidal racism and crackpot political Armaggedonism, but sort of a religion nevertheless. There are three main branches of Judyism, but their differences are only of intra-tribal interest. One branch eats shrimp and another considers shellfish in general a divine "No! No!" and they get into fierce intra-tribal squabbles over major issues like shrimp vs. no shrimp. But all three branches believe that G-d is very interested in Middle East real estate development and has a lively concern about the daily affairs of his favorite chosen sheeple. Some rabbis argue that G-d has retreated from the day to day management of the universe and left things in the capable hands of rabbis like Mad Meir Kahane to run. Some rabbis even think that they can defeat God in arguments. Imagine that chutzpah! Kahane is a good example of how Jewdayism has become virtually 100% Zionized Nerutei Karta is an example of non-Zionized Judyism. The Nerutei Karta website has called for Israel's peaceful dismantlement because their rabbis correctly see the Jew State as the cause of all the military, para-military, and private enterprise violence in the Middle East. Interestingly enough, in Japanese textbooks Joodyism is not treated as a world religion like Buddhism, Islam, and Christiantiy but as a tribal or national religion like Shinto or Voodooism.

SEMITISM is a secular political ideology of Jewish Supremacy and revenge. It appears rather early in Jewish history in the Old Testament in the Book of Esther in which there is no mention of God. In that late book of the Hebrew scriptures, G-d is already well dead or at least very comatose. The Esther fable resembles the hoaxoco$t fable in that both are pure fiction -not a shred of hard core historical evidence for either one- but both fables are mainstays of Jewish racism. The Book of Esther is the basis of the blasphemous holiday Purim, the one day of the year on which Jews celebrate the murder of Gentiles and get drunk. On their other holidays, they just celebrate the murder of Gentiles, e.g. Pissover, named in dishonor of G-d's getting really pissed off and sending his personal angel of death to urinate on the unfortunate Egyptians who were in no way guilty of anything. After all they did live under Pharoah's dictatorial rule. Would you kill a Russian peasant for Stalin's crimes ?

Do you recognize "SEMITISM" as the root of what has become an empty smear and cheap trick to change the debate topic? A dreaded weapon designed to silence any recalcitrant cattle-goyim? The smear, trick, and weapon is "auntie-Semitism," which really means a simple refusal to buy into Alley Weasel's lies or cave into the ADL [America's Defamation League] in their childish campaign against Christmas trees. The UAssA economy is going down the toilet and the ADL spincters worry about Christmas. Go figure!

ZIONISM is a 19th Century copy cat political philosophy which developed in the framework of European nationalism. Napoleon was rampaging all over Europe and nationalism was a defensive reaction on the part of the rampaged nations. Theodor Herzl proposed Zionism as a solution to Gentile resistance to Jewish Supremacy. His hobby was traveling and hobnobbing with top dog Gentile politicos who were interested in resisting Jewish domination of their country, culture, and economy. Such common sense Gentiles are today called "anti-Semitists" [No! Not "anti-Semites" who would be opposed to real Semites, the Arabs. Jews are a genetically mix of G-d knows what. You might as well call resistance to Jewish Supremacy "anti-Mongolianism."] At any rate, Teddy loved imitating rich Gentiles by wearing fancy clothes and telling them how much he too loathed a certain type of Jew. In fact, perhaps no single human being was ever more aware than Theodor Herzl of how disgusting, greedy, and revolting some elite Jews can be. He certainly loathed such Jews more than Hitler did. Perhaps less than Julius Streicher.

There was an early 20th Century Jewish joke, "What is a Zionist? A Jew who wants to send other Jews to Palestine." This suggests how unpopular Zionism was and still is among Jews. The silly fable that the holocaust led to the founding of Israel does contain one tiny element of truth and confirms the unpopularity of Zionism. The Jews only went to Palestine because they got kicked out of Europe. Not because they wanted to! Can you imagine how stupid it was to tell wealthy Jews living in Europe to leave their concert halls, theaters, opera houses, stock exchanges, and investment banks and go to some dirt farm in Palestine?

Meanwhile, back to Barry Chamish and Rabies Kahane! They both did aliyah and, thereby, made an existential commitment to the Jew State. Real Zionism involves aliyah. No aliyah = no Zionism! But the two of them are a great threat to the delicate balancing act played out by elite Jewry between Jewdayism - Semitism - Zionism. Their dogmatic extremism is too open and robs elite Jewry of the possibility of making pseudo-concession to the cattle-goyim. The two of them look too uncompromising, aggressive, and threatening, so that they tarnish the fragile image of Jewish victimhood and the phoney facade of Israel as a science-based democracy, outpost of human rights, bastion of Western interests, blah, blah, blah, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. Both of them seem to really believe the idiotic words of David Greenstone [aka Ben Gurion = son of Lion! What Yiddish chutzpah!], the moral dwarf and windbag who said, "It does not matter what Gentiles say. It only matters what Jews do."

Chamish gets bent out of shape because the Israeli government shrewdly rented a parking space and a few rooms in Jerusalem to the Vatican. But in exchange for the rentals, elite Jewry gets the full support of Pope Benedict Arnold, a traitor to Christianity who implies that Jesus came in vain to save his people. As a theology professor at Tuborg University, Benedict Arnold Ratzinger wrote that Judaism is still a valid covenant, so Jews can stick their nose up at the cruxifixion and resurrection. So if Christians do not work to convert Jews, why do they pester Eskimos?

Kahane wrote an incredibly revealing book, "They Must Go," full of ancient Joshuan genocidal racism updated and applied to today's Palestinian. I have long thought that the Mossad blew away the good rabbi because the boozo from Brooklyn too openly exposed the dark side of Zionized Judaism.

From the viewpoint of Gentiles and the world's tiny handful of genuinely anti-Zionist and anti-Semitist Jews, Chamish and Kahane are what Lenin called "useful idiots." They are useful because their extremism helps expose the oily, treacherous, and influential Semitists who continue to live among Gentiles in the diaspora.


Dramatic revision of victim numbers at Majdanek

Jürgen Graf
1. Januar 2006

Dramatische Revision der Opferzahl von Majdanek

In der polnischen Tageszeitung Gazeta Wyborcza vom 23. Dezember 2005 wird auf einen Artikel in der letzten Nummer der Zeitschrift Zeszyty Majdanka [Hefte von Majdanek], der offiziellen Publikation des Staatlichen Majdanek-Museums, hingewiesen, in dem Tomasz Kranz, Leiter der Wissenschaftlichen Abteilung des Museums, die Opferzahl des Lagers einer dramatischen Revision unterzieht. In Majdanek, schreibt er, seien ca. 78.000 Menschen umgekommen, davon 59.000 Juden und 19.000 Angehörige anderer Nationalitäten, vor allem Polen und Weissrussen. Diese Schätzung liege um das Mehrfache unter der bisher gültigen, hob Gazeta Wyborcza hervor.

Den Hinweis auf diesen Beitrag verdanke ich dem französischen Revisionisten Serge Thion. Ich werde mir die betreffende Nummer der Zeitschrift besorgen, den Artikel (zumindest auszugsweise) übersetzen, kommentieren und Interessenten auf Wunsch zustellen. Mein Beitrag wird vermutlich auch in den Vierteljahresheften für freie Geschichtsforschung erscheinen, sofern diese weitergeführt werden können.

Für Majdanek waren bisher u.a. folgende Opferzahlen genannt worden:

- 1,7 Millionen (Nürnberger Dokument USSR-93; vgl. IMT, Band VII, S. 214);
- 360.000 (Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz, „Oboz koncentracijny i zaglady Majdanek“ [Das Konzentrations- und Vernichtungslager Majdanek], in: Biuletyn Glowney Komisji Badania Zbrodni Niemieckich w Polsce [Bulletin der Hauptkommission zur Untersuchung der deutschen Verbrechen in Polen], Nr. 4, 1948);

- 235.000 (Czeslaw Rajca, „Problem liczby ofiar w obozie na Majdanku“ [Das Problem der Anzahl der Opfer im Lager Majdanek], in: Zeszyty Majdanka, XIV, 1992).

In dem gemeinsam mit mir verfassten Buch KL Majdanek. Eine historische und technische Studie (Castle Hill Publishers,Hastings 1998; englische Ausgabe: Concentration Camp Majdanek. A Historical and Technical Study, Theses & Dissertation Press, Chicago 2003)) errechnete Carlo Mattogno anhand der bestehenden Dokumentation eine ungefähre Opferzahl von 42.300. Die neuste offizielle Ziffer des Majdanek-Museums liegt somit weit näher bei der revisionistischen als bei der bisher in Polen offiziell geltenden!

Wie kann man angesichts dieser neuen, drastischen Revision seitens der offiziellen Holocaust-Historiker noch von der „Offenkundigkeit“ des Holocaust sprechen?

[ FT: translating final sentence = After such dramatic numbers reduction - from 1.7 million/ 360.000/235.000 now 78.000, Mattogno is down to 42.300 - how can anyone still talk about the 'obviousness' - judicial notice - of the Holocaust? - Answer: The Germans can because they love to feel guilty about that which they never did… greetings to Ernst, Germar, Siegfried, et al!]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest