Jewish Supremacists war on freedom of speech

Post Freedom Fighters Penal Addresses, their stories and travails contact information. As long as our Feddies are acting like criminals and jailing good people, this board will EXIST
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Jewish Supremacists war on freedom of speech

Post#1 » Sun Nov 20, 2005 2:03 am

The Jewish war on freedom of speech

Source: E-Mail
Published: November 18, 2005 Author: John Kaminski
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.

We have been betrayed by leaders known to us and by those unknown to us. The elected and unelected. Is there a crime worse than betrayal by leaders? .... Holocaust revisionism is at the cutting edge of contemporary thought.
— J. B. Campbell, The New American Man: A Call to Arms

One by one, those who oppose the manipulated Jewish version of history are being forcibly removed from society, and silenced because their views conflict with the program of mind-controlled slavery that has been meticulously crafted by the people who control the world by controlling the money.

Three leading historical revisionists — first, Ernst Zündel; then, Germar Rudolf; now, David Irving — are all under the gun in European courts, charged with crimes they are not even allowed to defend themselves against.

But the worldwide Jewish assault on freedom of speech reaches much, much farther than that. A kangaroo court packed with Israeli settlers as witnesses is now roasting of Palestinian benefactor Sami Al-Arian in Tampa. Anyone who realizes Sami's innocence (prosecution of him would not have been possible before the passage of the Patriot Act) and supports him suddenly receives a home visit from the FBI and IRS aimed at intimidating them into silence. The tactic works. Sami’s support has dwindled.

And at least two deposed leaders of nations — Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia and Saddam Hussein of Iraq — have through their words from unjust imprisonment risen to the status of heroes in the fight against the Jewish war machine that slaughters innocents in many countries around the world, and trumpets its right to pretend to an exalted, immune status that they insist nonJews are simply not eligible for. Everything the Western press has said about both vilified characters has been deliberately twisted negatively. Media manipulation of the facts of history is the second-best weapon in the arsenal of the Jewish war machine. The first, of course, would be money.

Orwell's "newspeak" thus arrives in nonfiction history couched in the language of the Jewish spy agency named the Anti-Defamation League. Anyone who questions the unprovable story of gas chambers in World War Two immediately gets slammed into jail, especially if you live in Germany or Canada, two satellite toadies to the Jewish-controlled U.S./UK/Israeli axis of evil now plundering the planet for profit.

Jewish observers of these statements immediately lapse into their disingenuous fusillade of aspersions beneath the banner of their cynical credo — anti-semitism — most, without realizing that many millions of people now know of centuries-long plans by the world's elitist organizations — notably churches — to subvert and control the minds of the human citizens of this planet. The Jews are not without a very curious history of collapses of societies in which they have risen to prominence: Rome, Venice, Spain, Britain, Russia, Germany, and now, the United States.

Today, new laws in most Western nations (arbitrary geographic divisions of the monolithic social force known as the Corporate West) prohibit even discussing such matters. The macabre legal phraseology the thought-controllers use is "defaming the memory of the dead."

The great laugh in this, as one of my fellow alarmists once mentioned, is that the creators of this law may feign concern about the reputations of deceased martyrs, but they sure don't care much about the living, judging by other behavior by the same group.

But this is no laughing matter. Because the real issue is freedom of speech for every person, and even more than that, it's about freedom of thought.

Fact: In most countries of the Corporate West, you may not even consider that much-maligned assertion trumpeted with certainty by men with such intellectual integrity as Rudolf and Zundel, both of whom are dismissed as white supremacists and sequestered from the realm of human communication so the the rest of the world won't get the information Jews are so desperately trying to conceal — namely, about their perfidy during World War II and their control of the financial forces that allow them to unduly influence all of the major governments in the world.

The dean of the Holocaust Revisionist movement, Robert Faurisson of France, has been expressing it best for almost 30 years. “Show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber!"

And in all that time, despite the ubiquitous and obscene hysteria of Jewish sewer tales, this evidence proving the existence of the Auschwitz gas chambers has yet to be brought forth for comprehensive public scrutiny. There can be only one answer to this mystery.

Yet with calculated choruses of ritualized mourning, the new Jewish Holocaust religion creeps around the world, spread by the efforts of a powerful yet clandestine network of Jewish supremacists, stifling thought and promoting Jewish profligacy and poverty and misery for everybody else wherever it spreads.

This is the result, despite the best efforts of the worldwide Jewish spin machine — which includes public schools and medical profession — of trying to convince us there was a deliberate policy of extermination of a certain ethnic group during World War II, and most importantly, that this is a tragedy that we should worship.

No one quibbles that Jews died, although the actual number ranges all the way down to 875,000, a number once reported by the Associated Press. But it is the argument about the gassings, and other side issues that put the Jews in a bad light, that sends all these people to jail.

To that end, hundreds if not thousands of Holocaust museums have sprung up across the United States, all funded by taxpayer dollars. Gee, imagine that? Whatever happened to separation of church and state? (Yes, I know; Bush got a hold of it.)

As trenchant Jewish critic Norman Finkelstein has pointed out, the Jewish community has made a mockery of decency by shoving this Holocaust worship down the throats of everyone else. Lenni Brenner and other relatively objective Jewish observers have chronicled the sorry role of international Jewish organizations complicit with Hitler in the manipulation of Europe's Jewish population for purposes of finagling a Jewish state in Palestine.

Yet most Jewish critics of Jewish behavior continue to deny the basic fiction of the German gassings even as they bemoan the pathology of the Jewish proclivity to suggest that Jewish dead are somehow more valuable than nonJewish dead.

And anyone who tries to stand up to this thought-control tyranny, if they are in the truculent satellite countries of the Corporate West axis of evil, is immediately silenced and thrown into jail for saying things that are simply not allowed by our Jewish keepers.

Perhaps an even worse effect is that hundreds of otherwise progressive news sources are effectively constrained from even reporting honestly on this very crucial issue to human development because of these insane hate speech laws regarding the Holocaust that are spreading around the world.

Ironically, the real hate speech comes from the very people who passed these laws.

The assertion that six million Jews were murdered in gas chambers by Germans does not stand in the light of critical and objective scrutiny, and never has. It is only the Zionist spin machine, which controls far more of your thought than you know, insisting on the fiction, repeating the propaganda, that has allowed this mistaken idea to take hold in the public mind. Call it the Lee Harvey Oswald principle.

It is merely a twisted legend of remembered misery fostered by a self-referential hysteria based upon an ancient edict that declares one random group of people in the desert are, in perpetuity, so vastly superior to every other group of humans on the planet that they may commit any crime against any nonJew without penalty. And this is precisely the madness that today has our world in a death grip.

Ernst Zundel's trial, a phony Jewish circus if there ever was one, has been postponed til after the holidays. The German judge fired Ernst's defense attorney and appointed a more suitable one provided by the state. Has there been a darker picture of justice in the Corporate West than this? Sure, every day.

Justice in the Corporate West these days is marked by American-hired mercenaries in black hoods using cattle prods on the orifices of people they know are innocent. That is the hallmark behavior of the real axis of evil: Britain, Israel, and the United States.

The rest of the world may not let this situation go on much longer, particularly since the Jewish infiltration of the U.S. government, as well as the U.S. entertainment, medical, and financial systems has as its objective the collapse of the entire world society and the consequently lucrative fire sale profits that will be available during the process of repairing a collapsed world structure. It's a place where we're headed where freedom is simply not on the menu.

Of the two free speech activists now imprisoned in Germany (Irving was Nov. 16 in Austria), Germar Rudolf may be the more significant arrest. His body of work is so academically scrupulous and his conclusions so definitive and persuasive that the Jews who run the Zionist murder machine simply had to get him off the street.

As Michael Hoffman reported:

Of all the scientists who have scrutinized the Auschwitz gas chamber yarn, Rudolf was the most meticulous and dispassionate. His deportation to face a prison sentence in the German-Israeli banana republic is a tragedy. To claim that he incited racial hatred because he cast doubt on the dogma of homicidal gas chambers is like arresting a scientist who
questions the Catholic dogma of the Virgin Birth because it might "incite hatred" of Italians. This is just too stupid.

And even creepier, now, when you pay attention to the corporate spun news, you see new stories almost every day: people being swept up for not thinking the right thoughts, people being jailed for decades for simply having thoughts and taking actions that show they have a sense of humanity and honesty, and are unwilling to accept the facile lies by a social establishment that is drenched in Jewish money, and skewing all the facts of existence for profit.

You think my statements are over the top? Consider this — the central core of the Holocaust debate: the gas chambers at Auschwitz.

This bold assertion, which has skewed all political dealings in the world since it was alleged to have happened in 1945, is only the last surviving bit of hyperbole from a much larger and much more ridiculous retinue of preposterous claims put forth by Jewish media over time to popularize Holocaust fever. These range from using the skin of dead Jews to make lampshades and soap. The term Holocaust itself stems from a phrase used by a famous writer that has now been proven false.

Jewish hysteric Elie Wiesel won the Nobel prize for literature for his accounts of the Holocaust, and his critics have proven his statements a work of fiction. Here is Faurisson’s assessment:

Elie Wiesel passes for one of the most celebrated eyewitnesses to the alleged Holocaust. Yet in his supposedly autobiographical book Night, he makes no mention of gas chambers. He claims instead to have witnessed Jews being burned alive, a story now dismissed by all historians. Wiesel gives credence to the most absurd stories of other "eyewitnesses." He spreads fantastic tales of 10,000 persons sent to their deaths each day in Buchenwald.

When Elie Wiesel and his father, as Auschwitz prisoners, had the choice of either leaving with their retreating German "executioners," or remaining behind in the camp to await the Soviet "liberators," the two decided to leave with their German captors.

It is time, in the name of truth and out of respect for the genuine
sufferings of the victims of the Second World War, that historians return to the proven methods of historical criticism, and that the testimony of the Holocaust "eyewitnesses" be subjected to rigorous scrutiny rather than unquestioning acceptance.

Another observer of the Holocaust debacle writes:

Of course the Holocaust happened, in a general sense. The question is how much of it happened. Only an idiot would say "the Holocaust didn't happen." The other side tries to pretend that revisionism is "Holocaust denial." When you say "the Holocaust didn't happen," you are just playing right into their hands, and discrediting revisionism.

The above link lists six reasons why the gas chamber story is a lie, which I will synopsize.

1. The room Jews claim was the Auschwitz gas chamber clearly isn’t that and wasn’t that (open the link and study the documentary photos).

2. Germans are meticulous record keepers. Many documents were seized after World War II. None ever contained any written plans to exterminate Jews.

3. There are no live photographs of people being gassed at Auschwitz.

4. Jewish witness testimony doesn’t prove there were gas chambers.

5. Standard (Jewish) reference books cannot be trusted.

6. Hitler stated his intentions openly, and the Nazis committed atrocities openly.

There is no valid evidence for the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz, only a concerted effort by Jewish media to convince people there were.

Contemplate the reasons why this is happening, and see how they pertain to your own health.

These thoughts need to be articulated.

Humans are decent people, not robotoids who need to be molded by social forces into banal, braindead docility.

The infinite flower that is the human individual should be nurtured and cherished, not controlled, abused and murdered for reasons that are lies.

Ladies and gentlemen: Some few of you already know this, but most of you don’t. Especially note the number of apparently progressive publications who will not run this story because it mentions Jews. Do you now realize you yourself are a prisoner in the Jewish war on freedom of speech?

As you sit there on your couch reading, in your comfortable home, watching a Hollywood movie, eating corporate food, believing in a groovy, synthetic god, sucking down an aspartame-laden Diet Coke, do you have any idea of what the poet William Blake once called “mind-forg’d manacles?”

Be careful what you think. You could be jailed for it at any time, especially if what you think is about Jews. This is the new American way. I wonder where it came from.

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Why the Sudden Clampdown on Revisionists?

Post#2 » Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:37 am

Why the Sudden Clampdown on Revisionists?

Synopsis: Political heretics being rounded up
Published: November 20, 2005 Author: Rixon Stewart
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.

Virtually unreported by the mainstream media and given little prominence even by those outlets that have reported it – probably so as not to alert too many – recent weeks have seen a major clampdown across the planet. On both sides of the Atlantic, historians, researchers and investigators have been arrested, detained and deported to Germany to face charges of “Holocaust denial.”

Among their number is German born Ernst Zundel, who immigrated to Canada in 1958 to work as a graphic artist. In the 1980's, he published a book called "Did Six Million Really Die?" and thereafter continued publishing and questioning conventional notions surrounding the Holocaust.

In 1985, he was charged with “publishing false news" and a series of trials followed between 1985 and 1988. In his defense he brought in gas chamber experts, other historians and cross-examined a number of Holocaust survivors, who reportedly fell apart under questioning.

In 2003 he was arrested for an alleged immigration violation while visiting the United States. Thereafter he was deported back to Canada, where he was held in solitary confinement in a maximum-security jail for nearly 2 years before being deported back to Germany.

Upon arrival in Mannheim, Germany, the 65-year-old Zundel was charged with “Holocaust denial,” an offence that carries a penalty of up to 5 years in jail.

Likewise, Germar Rudolph was also recently deported back to Germany to face similar charges. A German-trained chemist, Rudolf re-examined Auschwitz and Birkenau in 1989 for traces of Zyklon B, the gas the Nazis are supposed to have used to gas millions. As a scientist, he found the "gassing" claims to be scientifically untenable and therefore, in the eyes of German law, was judged to be “denying the Holocaust.”

He was sentenced in Germany to 14 months in jail but fled to the US before he served time. However, he was arrested on November 18, 2005 in Chicago, and extradited back to Germany.

Similarly, British historian David Irving was arrested on November 14, 2005, while visiting Vienna at the invitation of students from the city’s university. He was to have spoken of Adolph Eichmann’s offer to Jewish leaders in Budapest in 1944, to release Hungarian Jews in exchange for cash or trucks.

However, before he could address students he was arrested on charges brought against him nearly sixteen years ago, of publicly denying aspects of the Holocaust.

According to an Austrian state prosecutor, if convicted he could face up 20 years in jail.

Not only have America and Canada been deporting individuals to Germany to face the “Holocaust denial” charge, the Netherlands has too.

A Belgian national, Siegfried Verbeke, was charged with denying the Holocaust in August of this year, after he questioned the Anne Frank story. Two months later on October 6th, the Netherlands agreed to extradite him to Germany, where he faces 14 months in prison.

So why the sudden clampdown on Revisionists, and why now?

It’s been suggested that the Internet has panicked the Zionists, who to a large extent owe their power and influence to the Holocaust. After all, Israel was founded on its memory and if it’s proven to be a lie, or at least a gross exaggeration, the power the Zionists' hold over ordinary Jews could be undermined. For the very notion of the Holocaust has been used not only to extract financial redress from other nations but also to keep ordinary Jews compliant.

In effect, it has become like a grotesque doll wielded by witch doctors, used to keep individuals from asking too many questions, from thinking for themselves, or stepping out of line.

Formally the likes of Ernst Zundel might have been written off as cranks or extremists but the Internet changed that. It allows isolated individuals to question, often quite convincingly, the official line touted by the establishment and the mainstream media.

Moreover, the Internet illustrates that the accused are not “Holocaust deniers” – in the sense that they deny the Holocaust ever took place – or “right wing extremists” intent on resurrecting the Third Reich. That’s what the mainstream media would have us believe, but almost without exception, the accused admit that the Nazis were guilty of gross human rights abuses. What’s at issue here are the numbers of dead, how they died, and whether there was any clear plan of genocide at all.

In effect these men were engaged in historical inquiry, trying to establish the truth and broadcasting their findings, and that cannot be allowed in the New World Order.

Without even questioning what happened during the Holocaust, we should be asking ourselves: if it’s necessary to exact such draconian measures against those who ask questions, what exactly is being protected? Are historical truths and the memory of Holocaust victims being defended, or is it one of the foundations of the New World Order, or Zionist power?

Finally, a 1948 Red Cross report details nearly a quarter of a million Jews died in Nazi concentration camps but found no evidence of Genocide. This is in distinct contrast to the figure touted nowadays by the mainstream media and portrayed by Hollywood. At the time, the Red Cross was a neutral body with no political axe to grind, so why the difference? And we need to ask ourselves not only why there is such a difference in the numbers, but also why those who ask such questions are being silenced?

Like they say: “he who controls the past, controls the present…” and our perception of past events shapes the way we look at the world around us now. The Zionists understand this and know that the idea of the “Holocaust” is crucial to their power. Which is why such harsh measures are being exacted against those who ask too many questions.

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

'Holocaust Denial' Laws Are Disgraceful

Post#3 » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:33 am

'Holocaust Denial' Laws Are Disgraceful
By Mark Weber

David Irving, the controversial British historian, was arrested in Austria on November 11 for a 16-year-old violation of that country's "Holocaust denial" statute. He has now been formally charged, and if found guilty could face years in prison.

His case is by no means unique. In Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and several other European countries, as well as in Israel, it is a crime publicly to dispute the official version of Holocaust history.

The list of those who have been fined, imprisoned, or forced into exile for "denying the Holocaust" includes Robert Faurisson and Roger Garaudy in France, Siegfried Verbeke in Belgium, Juergen Graf and Gaston-Armand Amaudruz in Switzerland, and Guenter Deckert, Hans Schmidt and Fredrick Toben in Germany.

On November 8, the trial in Germany of "Holocaust denier" Ernst Zundel began with a dramatic clash between his attorneys and the presiding judge. And a few days later Germar Rudolf, a German citizen, was deported from Chicago to his homeland, where he likewise faces years of imprisonment for "denying the Holocaust."

Tony Blair's government considered introducing a "Holocaust denial" statute in Britain, but eventually rejected the idea. Italy, Ireland, Norway, Denmark and Sweden are among the other European countries that have declined to enact such laws.

Some people may be offended by those who play down Jewish death and suffering during World War II. But free and open societies protect even offensive speech. That's why western countries defend the right of their citizens, for example, to praise Communism or promote atheism.

"Holocaust denial" laws violate ancient and universal standards of justice. They criminalize even factual or truthful statements that "play down" or "whitewash" the Holocaust. They are selective and one-sided. In countries where they are on the books, the Holocaust is the only chapter of history that cannot be freely discussed. They inhibit historical inquiry and restrict free speech. They are a disgrace, and should be repealed.

Mark Weber is director of the Institute for Historical Review. In March 1988 he testified for five days in Toronto District Court as a recognized expert witness on Germany's wartime Jewish policy and the Holocaust issue.

The Institute for Historical Review, founded in 1978, is dedicated to promoting greater public awareness of the past, and especially socially-politically relevant aspects of contemporary history. It is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit educational enterprise.

Attachment converted: Programs:linex.gif (GIFf/ogle) (0000CEF8)
© 2005 Institute for Historical Review

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest