SV-40 a deadly cure???

Post useful information that you yourself have tried. Treatments that arent part of the Medical Death Cartel Monopoly. Treatment centers that offer real hope.... Healthy Foods, vitamins, minerals... sources for them etc....
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

SV-40 a deadly cure???

Post#1 » Thu May 01, 2008 2:16 pm

SV-40 a deadly cure???
by Geraldo Fuentes
Editor's Note:

When we first ran Geraldo's first story, SV-40, A Deadly Cure? we thought it was a bit on the conspiratory side, but it seemed well researched. We were pleased that many other journalists also investigated the material, proving the sad truth that Geraldo reported in ViewZone.

Research has now firmly linked many of today's cancers with tainted virus vaccinations given in the early 1950s. Could there be any more shocking and horrific revelations like this? We didn't think so - but we were wrong.

The latest horror story is posted HERE: SV40 Part Two for you to ponder. As you read it, also do not forget the Black Americans that were knowingly infected with Syphilis or the soldiers made to march through the fallout of our nuclear bomb tests...

But first, read Geraldo Fuentes original story. Also, important new information is at the end of this story.

If you received a polio vaccination in the 50's,
you may have gotten more than you know...

Watch this!:Interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman from Merck Pharmaceuticals on how they introduced SV-40 cancer virus in their vaccines and also how AIDs was introduced to the public from Africa!

This is the smoking gun of cancer and AIDs!

It was 1956. I was only six years old and attended grade school in Springfield, Massachusetts. I was too young to recollect the first round of polio vaccinations, but I have a few memories. I remember that my first grade class was escorted to the school gymnasium. There was a peculiar smell in the air. I think it was probably rubbing alcohol. And some of the other kids were crying. The shot itself wasn't so bad. I didn't cry, but my best friend did. At the end of the ordeal we all got a lollipop.

A few years later, when we marched again to the gymnasium it was different. There was no crying and no alcohol odor. Instead, there were long tables bearing neat rows of small paper cups, filled about half way with a liquid that tasted like bitter orange juice. White clad Nurses watched as each child drank the vaccine. There was no lollipop and, after we handed back the cup, we simply returned to class.

The government had initiated the mandatory polio vaccination programs in 1955. Prior to this, polio had killed or crippled thousands of children and adults all over the world. Attacking the central nervous system, this viral infection was transmitted by human contact, sewage and even by contaminated milk. Victims who contracted polio would incubate the virus in their intestines, where it would multiply and enter the lymphatic system. Eventually the virus would penetrate the nerves and travel along nerve paths, destroying neurons and rendering the muscles connected to them paralyzed.

The polio epidemic reached its height in 1952. It turned thousands of victims into cripples and confined countless children to large pressure chambers called "iron lungs," which helped them to breath when their diaphragm muscles were stilled. There was and still is no treatment for polio. Aside from attempts to maintain life functions, the disease must run its course.

And so, in 1955, just one year before I received it, Jonas Salk had performed no small miracle when he successfully mass-produced an effective polio vaccine by growing a form of the virus on the kidneys of rhesus monkeys. This virus would be harvested, killed, and given to healthy children like me, who would then develop antibodies which would kill any future invasion of the body by the polio virus.

This happy story of medical marvel has a deadly glitch. And it is especially deadly if, like me, you received your vaccinations in the 1950s, in certain states like Massachusetts.

In 1960, researchers discovered that the polio vaccine distributed to certain states was infected with another virus called "Simian Virus 40." SV-40 is a monkey virus that is not normally found in humans. Unknown at the time, it was present in hundreds of rhesus monkeys that were used to grow and harvest the polio vaccine. Injected into research animals, the SV-40 virus causes brain and lung cancers. Now, some forty years later, its effect on humans is just being investigated.

SV-40 has appeared in 61% of all new cancer patients -- patients too young to have received the contaminated vaccine being administered forty years ago!

Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, has recently isolated fragments of the SV-40 virus in human bone cancers and in a lethal form of lung cancer called mesotheliomas. He found SV-40 in 33% of the osteosarcoma bone cancers studied, in 40% of other bone cancers, and in 60% of the mesotheliomas lung cancers. Dr. Carbone believes this study explains why 50% of the current mesotheliomas being treated were no longer occurring in association with asbestos exposure, their traditional cause.

Researchers from the Institute of Histology and General Embryology of the University of Ferrara, lead by Dr. Fernanda Martini, discovered SV-40's presence in a variety other tumors. They found the rhesus monkey virus in 83% of choriod plexus papillomas, in 73% of ependymomas, in 47% of astrocytomas, in 50% of glioblastomas, and in 14% of meningiomas.

SV-40 also has been found in 23% of blood samples and 45% of sperm fluids taken from normal individuals! Researchers have determined the SV-40 virus can be transmitted sexually and through blood transfusions.

Even more shocking, SV-40 has appeared in 61% of all new cancer patients -- patients even too young to have received the contaminated vaccine being administered forty years ago! How could this happen?

My second vaccination was from a cup. This was the brainstorm of the FDA. Instead of getting the "dead" virus in an injection, the Federal vaccination policy mandated that children should be given the new live "oral polio vaccine" (OPV). This decision was based upon the belief that the OPV recipient would "shed" the virus through body contact with other non-vaccinated children and adults, thereby spreading the "live" virus throughout the population. Since the infection was extremely small, it would produce the desired antibodies while posing no threat of contracting polio. This, it was thought, would assure the total immunization of America and the eradication of the disease. The public was never informed that this national health strategy was being implemented, despite several cases of polio which were directly attributed to the vaccine.

By 1963, the estimated number of tainted polio vaccinations was estimated to be upwards of 98-million!

The SV-40 virus that contaminated the oral polio vaccine quickly spread from child to child and from child to adult, crossing state lines and national boundaries. By 1960, when the virus was first detected, it was already too late to prevent its dissemination throughout the population. The FDA quietly and gradually instituted a program to eliminate rhesus monkeys, who harbor the SV-40, and replace them with African Green monkeys that are free of the virus. By 1963 the monkeys had been replaced but the estimated number of tainted polio vaccinations was estimated to be 98-million!

According to the National Institutes of Health, high levels of SV-40 were identified in polio vaccines in Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, Utah, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Washington DC, Maryland, Delaware, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire. Low levels of SV-40 were found in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Missouri, Louisiana, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia. Polio vaccines in the other states show no SV-40 present.

This revelation has only recently come to public attention. Many people, like myself, were unaware that a potential for cancer had been implanted in their body. Researchers say that, by age fifteen, the virus stops shedding to others. I cannot but wonder how many people I contacted between the age of eight and fifteen... Did I shed the SV-40 virus to my mother, who eventually died of brain cancer? Will I contract brain, lung or bone cancer? Many other people in my age group are asking similar questions.

A number of public statements have been made by the National Cancer Institute in the past few months, attempting to put their spin on these disturbing revelations. In an statement published in the January (1999) New England Journal of Medicine, the institute states that there is no evidence of an increase in humans of the types of cancers found in laboratory animals that have been injected with SV-40. But other researchers remind us that SV-40 has already been found in a wide variety of other tumors. It has been shown that individuals who received the tainted oral vaccine demonstrate a higher occurrence of these cancers.

For example: people who lived in Massachusetts and Illinois in the 1950s, and received identified lot numbers of the contaminated oral vaccine, are now contracting osteosarcoma bone tumors at a rate of ten times more than those who received the vaccine free of the SV-40.

But the National Cancer Institute has been silent about these facts.

There needs to be more demographic studies to explore the relationship of SV-40 to adult onset cancers. Not surprisingly, the US government and its agencies are reluctant to pursue this matter. In fact, requests to the National Institute for Health for grants to study the SIV and simian cyto-megalovirus (SCMV) were recently denied. Microbiologist Howard Urnovitz, Ph.D., may have an explanation as he stated in the Boston Globe:

"that almost 100 million Americans were exposed (to SV-40) through a government sponsored program, but for over 30 years, there has been virtually no government effort to see if anyone's been harmed by the exposure." He added, "The government will not fund science that makes it look culpable."

Another method used by the National Cancer Institute to divert public concern is to issue statements that "many of the cancers under suspicion were contracted by people who are too young to have received the tainted vaccine in the 1950s." This argument, although true, ignores the potential of spreading the live SV-40 by "shedding" through personal contact. The oral polio vaccine was designed to be transmitted to non-vaccinated individuals by this very method. In fact, this was the reason that OPV was preferred over injection. If SV-40 is still being spread by contact today it is not surprising that these cancers are now affecting younger people.

Regardless of blame, severe damage to world health has already been done by the unsavory practice of growing vaccination products in animals. An example of these horrors was presented by Dr. Urnovitz at the Eighth Annual Houston Conference on AIDS.

Dr. Urnovitz revealed significant evidence that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is a monkey hybrid virus which was produced when 320,000 Africans were injected with polio virus contaminated with live simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in the late 1950's.

Apparently, viral fragments combine easily with other viruses to produce these hybrids called "chimeras." Prior to this revelation, health officials were blaming AIDS on the habit of certain Africans to consume monkey flesh.

What can be done now? "Make it in anything but animals," said Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center, which criticizes vaccine safety.

"We have the technology to make vaccines in human cell lines that are clean," said Dr. Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center, one of the first to discover SV-40 inside human tumors.

Until then we can only hope that researchers continue their work, regardless of the repercussions. Millions of people are already infected with SV-40 and are in danger. Many cancers do not develop until mid-life. Future generations must be protected. We must prohibit any future contamination of the world population, whether for our own good or not, by well-meaning governmental agencies.

UPDATE: October-November 2002 -- The following article appeared in the NY Times on October 22, 2002, partially quoted as follows:

Monkey Virus - Cancer Link Debated (THE ASSOCIATED PRESS)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Despite years of study, there remains too little evidence to conclude a monkey virus that once tainted some polio vaccine can cause cancer in humans.

Still, the Institute of Medicine said Tuesday, although studies of people who received the vaccine have not shown increased cancer rates, a connection cannot be completely ruled out.

The institute, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, recommended development of a federal response plan for dealing with contaminated vaccines and better tests for the monkey virus to determine how widespread it is.

The test in this article was to compare the group of people who got the original "live" virus in the 1950's, in school immunization programs, with the cancer rates of the general population. But, remember, the whole purpose of the mandatory "live" virus immunization program was to make sure that EVERYONE was exposed to the new batches of vaccine. This was done by having innoculated children "shed" the virus to others -- their parents, other children and virtually anyone that had contact with them after they were vaccinated. In other words, the entire American population was subjected to the SV-40 in either the original innoculation or from the shedding. So it is natural that the rates of cancer would be no different between the school children and anyone else that they infected.

On the whole, cancer rates have sky-rocketed, especially those rare forms related to the SV40, yet this type of misleading (i.e. lies) is typical of what the current administration and Federal offices are attempting to do with everything from the threat of Iraq to the infecting of its own population in the past.

If you want to get involved in a potential class action suit, you might want to contact a woman whose daughter contracted one of these rare forms of cancer (medulloblastoma), attributed to the SV40 contamination. Not only does she suffer from having her child impacted by this horrible governmental error, but she also has the uncertain guilt of possibly infecting her daughter from her own exposure to the live virus back in the 1950s.

Maybe you have had a similar experience. Are you angry? Then contact Sandy at Remember the words of Mahatma Gandhi: "Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is still the truth."

Site Admin
Posts: 7781


Post#2 » Thu May 01, 2008 2:17 pm

There have long been allegations that the rapid spread of AIDS, both in Africa and in the United States, was originally precipitated by various vaccine programs. A new investigation shows conclusively that HIV infection among San Francisco gay men was a result of contaminated vaccines.

If this contamination was intentional, it would represent the worst assault in American history, and probably in human history. The truth must be determined, and justice must be done.

There is strong reason to believe that the HIV contamination of the vaccines was intentional. Studies were performed to determine whether HIV could have accidentally survived the vaccine production methods. These studies showed that all traces of HIV would have been easily destroyed, without human intervention.

It does not matter whether HIV is a product of nature, or has long existed. Anthrax is also natural, and has long existed. It can, and has, also been turned into a weapon and used intentionally. The same may be true of HIV.

The "Ames" strain of anthrax, used in recent terror assaults, is a product of U.S. military labs. It may have been stolen by terrorists, or perhaps the development program was infiltrated by a mole working for some hostile foreign power.

Whether it was the work of terrorists, or hate groups, or renegades within our own government, needs to be investigated.

Demonstrating the link of HIV to the experimental vaccines is a very commonplace type of statistical analysis. It is the same principle as determining whether a vaccine is working, or produces sides effects. Two professors specializing in statistics have confirmed the validity of the methodology in this study. The full analysis can be viewed at:

All concerned persons should try to learn about this issue, and help to raise a voice.


This statistical study concerns what is probably one of the most significant and overlooked issues of our time. It demonstrates proof of a strong link between the U.S. outbreak of AIDS, and hepatitis studies that were performed on gay males, starting in the late 1970s. The analysis refutes explanations that attribute the connection simply to sexual risk behavior on the part of the study participants.

The analysis also presents evidence suggesting that HIV infections occurring in the studies were more likely to have been intentional rather than accidental. This raises the question of whether the men in these studies might have been used as guinea pigs for covert experimentation, or whether a sexually-transmitted epidemic might have been deliberately induced, as a means to rid society of "undesirables". Regardless of whether the virus itself came into existence naturally, its initial spread was clearly unnatural.

The methodology used in this document is highly similar to that which is typically used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. The analysis evaluates differences in infection rates between a suitable control group, versus a vaccine test group.

In the first two years of the epidemic in San Francisco, between 50 and 60 percent of the earliest known AIDS cases were from persons involved in the hepatitis studies. A goal of this analysis is to calculate specific probabilities for these and other similar figures. It demonstrates that such figures cannot credibly be attributed merely to chance, or to differences in risk behaviors.

Odds of the disproportionate levels of HIV infection among men in the vaccine trial, relative to other men of similar risk behaviors, are shown to be as little as 1 in a trillion.

A statistical link exists not only to experimental vaccines, but also simply to the fact of participation in the hepatitis studies, such as simply to have blood drawn for purposes of monitoring hepatitis prevalence. Few logical or benign possibilities exist to explain why there should be such a connection, yet it exists. Odds against the higher initial rate of AIDS among study participants was as little as 1 in 300,000, when compared to men of equal or higher risk.

Various epidemiological anomalies also suggest that an artificial, simultaneous, mass-infection would have been necessary in order to produce the type of explosion in HIV that was observed in the early 1980s. Full-blown AIDS should have been evident many years earlier, before HIV was nearly so widespread Thousands of infections would have been necessary to fuel the levels of HIV growth that were observed, during years in which no retroactive evidence of HIV exists.

These anomalies are analyzed using computer modeling software.

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

SV40 is just the tip of the iceberg; there are countless can

Post#3 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:23 am

Wednesday, April 1, 2009
SV40 is just the tip of the iceberg; there are countless cancerviruses in our vaccines. ... e-are.html

In a previous report on the Rockefeller family I reported on what may very well be the first cancer virus to have contaminated our vaccines. For those who have not read this report, I'll begin with a brief synopsis:
Francis Peyton Rous joined the Rockefeller Institute in 1909 and developed the theory that cancer can be caused by viruses. He isolated a virus he found in purebred specimens of a specific species of chickens. When he encountered the virus it was incapable of causing cancer in any other species of chickens. Rous wrote:

A feature of the transmissible tumors, which has largely drawn
the attention of cancer workers and has modified current theories
of cancer origin, is their striking dependence for a successful
transplantation on the character and condition of the individual
host. It is a dependence similar to that shown by transplanted
normal tissue, and apparently the same laws largely influence both.
This trait of tumors is illustrated exceptionally well by the chicken
sarcoma. During a considerable period, it could be propagated only
in fowls of precisely the sort in which the original growth occurred
(chart I ); and even now it succeeds best in these. It has never
been successfully transmitted to birds of other species, or to mammals.
Young fowls are the most favorable hosts; and healthy,

With great effort Rous managed to increase the potency and spread the virus in other chickens as well:

With repeated transmission the rate of growth,
as well as the percentage of successful transplantations, has increased;
and the period which elapses between implantation and the
appearance of the new sarcoma as a palpable mass has been reduced
from about four weeks to four or five days. The tumor obtained
from the first inoculation required seventy-one days to reach a size
of 5.o by 3.3 centimeters, and to affect seriously the health of the
host. But in later generations, produced by a similar method of
inoculation, the appearance and development of the tumor have
become progressively more rapid.

This virus, that at first only occured in a specific chicken Rous had found and would grow in no other species, for some reason ended up in the first Yellow Fever vaccine this same Rockefeller Institute introduced in 1937. A study reported:

Removal of avian leukosis viruses (ALV), which have contaminated the yellow fever (YF) 17 D vaccine since its development in the middle 1940's, had no effect upon the antigenicity of this vaccine in rhesus monkeys.

The Rous Sarcoma virus (the name given to the cancer virus Rous discovered and strengthened) is a type of Avian Leukosis Virus.
It's disturbing that this virus turned up in the vaccines of the same institute that discovered it, since when they found this virus it only managed to infect a small group of purebred chickens. This wouldn't be such a problem though if this virus only caused cancer in these chickens, but it now causes cancer in all sorts of species. Rous already tried to use the virus to cause cancer in mammals himself, but failed. However, for the virus Rous discovered continued to increase in potency, and by 1963 it was proven that this virus that once infected only a small group of a specifc species of chickens could cause tumors in monkeys.
The problem with the theory of accidental contamination is that the same people who developed this vaccine were the people who found the virus years earlier in a tiny group of chickens, and took great effort to increase it's lethality and tried to use it to cause cancer in mammals.

The most well known cancer virus that contaminated vaccines was SV40, but it's less well known that other virus that cause cancer contaminated the Polio vaccine as well. One of these is the Cytomegalovirus.
One study explains:

Live oral poliovirus vaccines and simian cytomegalovirus.

Live oral poliovirus vaccines (OPV) are often produced in primary Cercopithecus monkey kidney (CMK) cells. The kidneys of these monkeys are often latently infected with simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV), and CMK cultures are frequently contaminated with SCMV. We tested human, monkey and rabbit tissue culture systems, and found that MRC-5 cells are most sensitive for detection of SCMV. To address the question of whether OPV could be contaminated with infectious SCMV, we inoculated MRC-5 cells with neutralized OPV manufactured in the United States between 1972 and 1998. Infectious SCMV was not found in any of the vaccine lots tested. We also used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to search for SCMV DNA in live oral poliovirus vaccines; SCMV DNA sequences were found in several of the vaccine lots manufactured prior to 1992.

This study didn't manage to find live Cytomegalovirus in the vaccine, but another did manage to trace an infection of this virus back to the vaccines:

A cytopathic 'stealth' virus was cultured from the cerebrospinal fluid of a patient with a bipolar psychotic disorder who developed a severe encephalopathy leading to a vegetative state. DNA sequencing of a polymerase chain reaction-amplified product from infected cultures has identified the virus as an African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV)-related stealth virus. The virus is similar to the SCMV-related stealth virus isolated from a patient with chronic fatigue syndrome. The findings support the concepts that stealth viruses can account for a spectrum of dysfunctional brain diseases and that some of these viruses may have arisen from live polio viral vaccines.

Cytomegalovirus has been linked to cancer by multiple studies. One study found the virus in 90% of all cytoblastoma's, a specific type of brain tumor.
Another study isolated the specifc gene of this virus that causes the brain cells to become cancerous. Yet another study provided evidence of a link to protate cancer.

This cancer virus is capable of spreading from person to person, there is no need to receive a contaminated vaccine to become infected. Any person with a CMV infection, even without symptoms, can pass it to others.
A study showed that while only 36.6% of 6 to 11 year old children are infected with the virus, 90.8% of people above 80 are.

Another new STD that appeared around the same time as HIV is Mycoplasma Genitalium. A study in young adults in the United States showed that 1% of the population was infected.
This new STD has been linked to infertility in females. In one study, the mycoplasm was found in the cervical canal of 19.6% of all infertile women and in only 4.4% of fertile women.

While discovered in 1980, the earliest time this vaccine can be traced back to is 1974, because this mycoplasm was first found in the throats of men who received an experimental mycoplasm vaccine while serving in the US military during that time.

According to HIV researchers, the United States has a long history with experimenting with mycoplasms. Boyd Graves website mentions:

In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus.
Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program.

The link between vaccinations and biological weapons goes back far.
During World War II the United States had a biological weapons program in Fort Dettrick.
The website of Fort Dettrick mentions:

From the moment of its birth in the highest levels of government, the fledgling biological warfare effort was kept to an inner circle of knowledgeable persons. George W. Merck was a key member of the panel advising President Franklin D. Roosevelt and was charged with putting such an effort together. Merck owned the pharmaceutical firm that still bears his name.

An often heard question is how it's possible that cancer rates remained stationary or declined during the second half of the 20th century according to official government statistics if cancer causing viruses were spread through our vaccines. The reason for this is that many cases of cancer are never reported. One reason for this is that nowadays less autopsies are performed.
An article made available by the Environmental Research Foundation reports:

If we accept that the average autopsy rate in the U.S. is now somewhere between 10% and 5% (say, 7.5%), then we can calculate that the autopsy rate has declined at an annual rate of 5.2 percent per year for the past 35 years.[5] Since autopsies are needed to discover 40% of the cancers in those who die in hospitals, it seems entirely possible that the decline in the autopsy rate completely explains the recently-reported declines in both cancer incidence and cancer deaths in the U.S. Indeed, one might legitimately ask whether U.S. cancer rates are, in actual fact, continuing to climb steadily, with the trends hidden by misdiagnosis and the absence of autopsies.

This claim is supported by a study done in Sweden. The autopsy rate in the Swedish city of Malmö declined from 81% in 1984 to 34% in 1993, and in the same time the percentage of tumours incidentally detected at autopsy went down in men from 40 to 19% and in women from 39 to 17%. This is one explanation. Another is given by a study that shows that not all cancer cases are reported. The study reports that "the true incidence of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the U.S. is unknown". Between 1990 and 1991 100% of all cases were correctly reported by the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, while between 1998-1999 only 34.5% of all cases of this type of cancer were reported. This shows that while the government institution tasked with combating cancer will proudly lie to the public by telling us that the incidence of cancer has declined, their own studies show that less cases of cancer are simply correctly diagnosed and reported to the authorities. In fact, by taking a look at the whole full study, it becomes clear that while the percentage of reported cases has fallen by two thirds, the incidence of this main type of leukemia has more than tripled, from 14 cases per year per 100,000 people in 1990, to 57 cases per year per 100,000 people in1999.

While the cancer viruses were being spread through the vaccines, one woman tried to warn the public. This woman was Bernice Eddy. In a testimony to the US congress in 1972 she warned:
‘If you continue to allow these contaminated [polio] vaccines to go out, I guarantee you that over the next 20 years you will have epidemics of cancer unlike the world has ever seen.’

The congress didn't take action, and we can see the result all around us. Most of the people who spread these vaccines are no longer alive, but the diseases they spread in men and women around the planet may plague humanity for eternity.

Posts: 1087

Post#4 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:44 pm

Another front in the war on population. The elites only want enough useless eaters to serve them and attend to all their needs.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest