THE BIBLICAL HISTORY OF CREATION by Bob Sellers

As more scientists come around to the creation side, more and more facts are coming out that destroy the myth of Evolution. Did you know man and Dinosaur walked the earth at the same time? What was the canopy made out of that protected the earth before the deluge??
pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

THE BIBLICAL HISTORY OF CREATION by Bob Sellers

Post#1 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 8:14 pm

THE BIBLICAL HISTORY OF CREATION

See more articles by Bob Sellers at: http://stargods.org/SellerIndexPage.htm

Webmaster may or may not agree with all articles.

Who knows how many children have been taught that Eve ate an apple when God told her not to. What an embarrassment to the religious teachers of today. How many sermons have been preached on the Sin in the Garden by "parsons" who do not have the slightest idea of what that sin was?

Open your Bible, PRAY that the Holy Spirit will show you the truth, and I will tell you what I have received thru study. I sincerely hope that you will NOT take my word for it without checking it out for yourself. The following is not contradicted any where in the whole of God's word. On the contrary, much of the hard to understand passages of the Words and parables of Jesus as well as the writings of Paul, Peter and James are made plain.

In the first chapter, we learned that there was an earth age before this present one, and that God destroyed his original creation. This in itself is an astounding statement, yet God's Word declares it for those with "eyes to see". Also in Gen 1, we saw the CREATION of the second (this present) Earth and Heaven Age, through the sixth day man (the races of even today), and after the seventh day the FORMING of Adam (the eighth-day man), and his wife, Eve. We found that this Adam was made a special servant of God, for it was through his seed that Christ Himself was to come. This man was special. We found that even the ORDER of creation was different in Gen chapters 1 and 2. God gave Adam and Eve totally different instructions than the sixth day man, and prepared a special place for them to live, separate from the rest of creation.

As we now dive into Gen chapter 3, the first questions I want you to consider are these: Was Satan aware of God's plan? Was Satan aware of God's plan in the first earth age? Does Satan ALWAYS seek to destroy God's plan? And finally, if Satan was aware that God's plan was to send Jesus in the flesh through the seed of this special creation at some future time, how best could Satan disrupt this plan When we get to Gen chapter 6, we will see that Satan's fallen angels seduced the daughters of Adam (in fact ALL of them except Noah's family) bringing forth the 'giants', which was the reason for the deluge. This was just a continuation of Satan's attempt to fatally corrupt the Seed line through which the Messiah was to come. OL' Scratch has not given up to this day!

Recall from Gen 2:9, that in the Garden was "the Tree of LIFE" (Which we find many places in the New Testament was Jesus), and "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" (That old serpent, Satan, the deceiver, the destroyer, the devil, the beast, Lucifer, the king of Tyre, and etc..) Genesis chapter 3 That old serpent was in the garden, alright. He was not a physical "snake", but a spiritual one. The word translated 'serpent' is nachash in Hebrew and there are four words, each with different meanings.

The word is generally accepted to be "the shining one" in most texts. Strong's # 5172 nachash (naw-khash'); a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate: KJV-- X certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X indeed,diligently observe. (DIC)Strong's # 5173 nachash (nakh'-ash); from 5172; an incantation or augury:KJV-- enchantment. (DIC)Strong's # 5174 nechash (Aramaic) (nekh-awsh'); corresponding to 5154; copper: KJV-- brass. (DIC) Strong's # 5175 nachash (naw-khawsh'); from 5172; a snake (from its hiss):KJV-- serpent. (DIC)So Satan was a charmer. A silver tongued devil, just like he is today.Lets look at verse 3:

Look at the words used for "eat" and "touch "EAT-- Strong's # 398 'akal (aw-kal'); a primitive root; to eat (literally or figuratively): KJV-- X at all, burn up, consume, devour (-er, up), dine, eat (-er, up), feed (with), food, X freely, X in ... wise (-deed, plenty),(lay) meat, X quite. (DIC)TOUCH--Strong's # 5060 naga` (naw-gah'); a primitive root; properly, to touch, i.e. lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphemism., to lie with a woman); by implication, to reach (figuratively, to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.): KJV-- beat, (X be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join,near, plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch. (DIC)Isn't it strange that naga (touch) means to lie with a woman? In verse 6 we find that Eve partook of the 'fruit of the tree', and ALSO gave of the same fruit to Adam, and he partook also. Is this strange to you?

Look what Eve said to God in verse 13- "the serpent beguiled me... just look at what the Hebrew word means--beguiled--Strong's # 5377 nasha' (naw-shaw'); a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: KJV-- beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly. (DIC)Was Eve seduced? Paul (2 Cor 11:2-3) says she was. (2) For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. (3) But I fear, lest by anymeans, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

What do you suppose the Greek word here translated 'beguiled' means? Strong's # 1818 exapatao (ex-ap-at-ah'-o); from 1537 and 538; to seducewholly: KJV-- beguile, deceive. (DIC) Notice that it has only one meaning. "to seduce wholly" Look now at verse 16. Notice that God says "I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception..." I believe it is plain here that Eve was pregnant! Look at the word 'conception'. It is definitely present tense, not future.

Strong's # 2032 herown (hay-rone'); or herayown (hay-raw-yone'); from 2029; pregnancy: KJV-- conception. (DIC)Strong's # 2029 harah (haw-raw'); a primitive root; to be (or become) pregnant, conceive (literally or figuratively): KJV-- been, be with child,conceive, progenitor. (DIC)In addition, in verse 15, God tells Satan that He will put enmity (hate) between her seed and his (Satan's) seed.

Every Christian accepts her seed as Christ, but they gloss over the phrase dealing with Satan's seed. Christ Himself told of them in many places. See especially the parable of the tare sin Matt. 13:24-42. Thus Eve was carrying twins, but not of the same father. The medical term is "paternal twins", and it is not uncommon today among prostitutes. In 1990,the Reader's Digest carried a story of a woman in Thailand giving birth to twins of two different races, one oriental and one black. But does God's Word indicate they were twins? I think so.

In Gen 4:1-2 we read "And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. (2) And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.(KJV)

Look at the Hebrew phrase used for the English "and again" Strong's # 3254 yacaph (yaw-saf'); a primitive root; to add or augment(often adverbial, to continue to do a thing): KJV-- add, X again, X any more,X cease, X come more, + conceive again, continue, exceed, X further, X gather together, get more, give more-over, X henceforth, increase (more and more),join, X longer (bring, do, make, much, put), X (the, much, yet) more (and more), proceed (further), prolong, put, be [stronger-], X yet, yield. (DIC)Thus the Hebrew says she continued in labor.. Is there any other proof? I'm glad you asked. It is obvious that Cain and Abel were the same age. Why?

Look at verses 3 and 4 and you will see that they both brought their sacrifices to God at the same time. In the Hebrew traditions, it is at the age of 13 that a man becomes accountable (Bar-Mitzvah). They obviously became accountable at the same time! We know that Cain killed Abel. Could it be that this was because Abel was the firstborn of Adam, and the beginning of the promised seed line of Christ?

It is written that Cain and his sacrifice was "not acceptable" to God. Did Adam think Cain was his own firstborn? No he didn't. Cain didn't look anything like Adam. How do I know? Read 4:25 and 5:3. Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. (KJV) Gen 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: Is there any other proof that Cain was NOT Adam's son? I'm glad you asked!

Notice that Gen chapter 5 is the genealogy of Adam. Cain is not listed in that genealogy. Do you know why? Cain was NOT Adam's son! Cain has his own genealogy in Gen chapter 4:17-24.2) See Jn 8:44, the words of Jesus "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning,and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (KJV)3) See Matt 13:38, the words of Jesus "The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;" (KJV)

Please note the Greek word used for "seed" as used in this parable. Strong's # 4690 sperma (sper'-mah); from 4687; something sown, i.e. seed(including the male "sperm"); by implication, offspring; specifically, a remnant (figuratively, as if kept over for planting): KJV-- issue, seed. Interesting, what? See First John 3:12 "Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous." (KJV)The English word "of" here is the Greek word ek, which means "out of the immediate origin" Are the children of Cain still with us? I'm glad you asked. Yes they are.

Do you know who the KENITES are? You should. It's the Hebrew word for Cain! Strong's # 7014 Qayin (kah'-yin); the same as 7013 (with a play upon the affinity to 7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV-- Cain, Kenite (-s). (DIC) The Kenites were the ones who killed Jesus and the ones to whom Jesus was talking to in Jn 8:44. Cain killed the firstborn son of Adam, and his children killed the only begotten Son of God! Notice that the knowledge of who the Kenites are is worth a special blessing from the Father. You can see this in Rev 2:9 and 3:9.

Only the churches of Smyrna and Philadelphia received God's blessing. They taught who those were who "claimed to be of Judah, and are liars!" (I think this is the tribe of DAN ~Lu) Read it for Yourself. You should devote some special study in the books of Numbers, Deut, Joshua and Jeremiah, because the Kenites are mentioned there by name. By the Ezra-Nehemiah period they were temple servants or Nethinims, and by the time of Jesus, they were the scribes. I'll bet you never thought of this did you?

There are still some difficulties, because the WORD says everyone died in the flood of Noah's day - or does it? Wouldn't this include the Kenites, and in fact all the other races? Well, if you take man's tradition it would. But in fact we know that the Kenites and the other races got through the flood. The nice part is that the Bible tells you how.

BIBLICAL CREATION -- A MID-TERM SUMMARY

The ideas presented with blatant audacity in the first parts of this treatise have caused some to howl with unbelief, even insinuating heresy. For the most part, these are the ones who have filled themselves with the 'cherished' traditions of man which are so prevalent in the theological cemeteries (pardon the faux pas) of the world's 'religions', and have become very learned in man's tradition. To these I offer no apologies.

I will discuss my Fathers Word as it is written with them or anyone else, in great detail, and with patience and love; but I will not spend a moment disputing over the commentaries of man. To these incredulous I make the following offer: Let us limit the proof of our ideas to the WORD of God, AS IT IS WRITTEN and thereby discern both what has been and is to be. This approach, you see, is very biblical. 2 Tim 2:15 "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." (KJV)Psalms 119:160 "Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever." (KJV)

There are many other references which could and should be understood. Many people sit in cemetery (seminary) classes to be taught the word of God so that they may be prepared to teach and preach. Saul of Tarsus is one great example in particular of one who came out of the Babylon of denominationalism. He was taught in the cemetery (see Matt 23:27 and you will understand my faux pas of the Pharisee school, (Acts 22:3), by Gamaliel, the 'great doctor of the law' (Acts 5:34). For those unfamiliar with Saul and his zeal for 'God' using what he had been taught (by man) read Acts chapters 8 and 9. Note that it took a visit from the LIVING WORD Himself to open Paul's spiritual and physical eyes. The problem was not that Paul did not know WHAT God's Word said: It was that he was never taught to BELIEVE what it said nor to interpret it without the bias and blindness of man's tradition.

It has been said that those who fail to understand and heed the lessons of history are doomed to repeat the errors. We witness this so often today in well-intentioned but blinded men of God who teach the traditions of man which they have learned in the great seminaries: We hold up men as beacons of truth instead of the Living Word; We constantly hear about 'that great old preacher' or 'that great communitarian, never realizing that such commentaries are themselves firmly rooted in the teachings of Josephus (a Pharisee), or in the works of the early church fathers such as Origen, Aristobulis and Jerome. These writings are perhaps 99 % biblical, but of times reek of the mixture of Pharisee leaven (perhaps in advertently) added to the bread of Life.

The great evidence which plainly suggests that many of these early Christian writers borrowed heavily from the early Latin texts of the Pharisees such as the Mishna, Juchasm and Porta Mosis is ignored. The lesson should be clear: We must be careful to use the written WORD as our guide, or we shall surely fall into the same pitas Paul. One may rightly ask 'what problem has he with the Pharisees? My friend, the words of Jesus were full of contempt for the denominations of that day. We could literally spend hours reading about it in the gospels, for when Christ was not doing His miracles He was teaching against the Pharisees. He began in Matt 5 (see esp vv 19-20) and finally finished in John 19:31.

Who do you think was responsible for His crucifixion? Who else but the denominations of the day led by the Pharisees. Do you allow the traditions of the denominational world to crucify Him again in your heart by refusing to believe His Word? My firm hope is that the comments above not be misunderstood. I certainly do not suggest that one should not read any and all subject matter one may be presented with, including commentaries. The point I wish to make is just this: The Word of God we now have is both sufficient and complete. There is NO contradiction AT ALL in its volume. The problems always come when some tradition of man is pressed into the pages. The Word will ALWAYS vomit the traditions out with expedience when you seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

Finally, I am not asking that you accept my words more than the words of any other man. I am pleading that you get into the WORD that counts, however, the WORD of the Living GOD, and decide for yourself what you will accept. There will be no scripture lawyer standing in the judgement to defend your beliefs except Jesus. Be sure you know His WORD.These studies in Genesis are very important to understand God's plan. In fact if one does not comprehend the beginning, how will we understand "the rest of the story"?

We will fail to see the design as it was iterated in the persons of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. We cannot comprehend the prophetical books nor even the lesson books of Job, Jonah, Canticles, Esther and Ezra. We will fail to see the deeper truths in the parables of Jesus, as He both taught and confirmed that" which was from the beginning". They didn't recognise Him when He came the first time. In fact they killed Him. Will you bet your spiritual life on them recognising Him the second time? Jesus Himself told the Pharisees this in John 5:43 "I am come in my Father's name, and receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.(KJV) "We will need much knowledge for the days coming shortly upon us. It is through the knowledge of who the Kenites (Rev 2:9 and 3:9) are that we can recognize our adversary and put on the gospel armor of Eph. 6:12-18. God is indeed calling out an army for these end times. END OF COMMENTS

BIBLICAL CREATION UNDERSTANDING GENEALOGIES BRIEF REVIEW

In part 1, we established from Genesis 1 the existence of the first earth and heaven age, its destruction in old time and thee establishment of the second (this present) earth and heaven age. We further found that the earth was NOT created 'tohu va bohu', or destroyed, but that it BECAME that way. We used this knowledge to understand some 'problem passages' in 2 Peter, Jeremiah, and Isaiah. Although we did not choose to examine some of Jesus' parables with this knowledge, if you would do so on your own, you would see a great light go on in your mind. Much more would make perfect sense.In Part 2, We talked extensively about the days of creation, and found that there was NOT merely six days of creation, but there were EIGHT.

A neophyte reading chapters 1 and 2 can see that the order of creations described in Ch 1 is different from the order described in Ch 2; That the instructions given to man were different; That the Hebrew words used for 'create' and 'man' in chapter 1 are different from the words used for 'formed' and 'Adam' as in ch 2. Since we began by accepting that ALL of God's Word is true, we cannot be forced to accept that only one of the first 2 chapters is true: Nay, on the contrary, we must say "let God be true and every man a liar." BOTH chapters 1 and 2 are TRUE.
Since both chapters are true, then our only option is that they are describing two separate creations, one on the SIXTH day, and one on the EIGHTH day, just as it is written. This Eighth day creation of the promised seed line is spoken of eloquently in 2 Peter 2:5: "And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; (KJV) "You should recognise that the word 'person' in your KJV is in italics, meaning that it is not in the original language. Noah was the described as "eighth", because he was of the EIGHTH day creation, and God had promised to preserve this seed line until the birth of Messiah.

In part 3 we see that the "original sin" was physical adultery on the part of the first of the eighth day creation, God's "chosen". We noted that the physical adultery was preceded by the spiritual adultery of not believing God; Eve listened to the father of lies, the devil, who we know also as the father of the Kenites (Cain), and accepted his word instead of God's.

We also began the tracing of the genealogy of Adam, as well as that of Cain. We found that though Cain was Eve's son, he was not Adam's son. Cain was the firstborn son of Satan, and it was his children the KENITES who killed Christ. It is the children of the Kenites who labor today to destroy Christ's sheep through lie sand the tradition of man via commentaries. We are in a spiritual war: No one should go into a battle without a knowledge of who the enemy is and how to recognise him. We must know the nature of his weapons,and have the proper arms to overcome them. Many today are heading to the battle behind a banner held up by the enemy himself, thinking they are heading for safety.

UNDERSTANDING GENEALOGIES

We have a saying "like father-like son", or, 'He's a chip off the old block'. The study of genealogy is often a dry subject out in the open, but virtually everyone of us has longed to know who our ancestors were, and how they fit into history. God's Word uses genealogy for a special reason. The chapters in the WORD devoted to the fact that so-and-so begat so-and-so for page after page are often overlooked.

The Holy Spirit did not put these chapters in to fill up space. They are there that we may prove the WORD for ourselves. The first genealogical list is found in Genesis chapter 4. It is no surprise to me that Cain's genealogy is listed first. He was the first child born in this earth age. His father was not Adam, but Satan. (Jn 8:44, Matt 13:38, 1 Jn 3:12) Cain, we find, obviously did not look anything like Adam (Gen 5:3).Genesis Chapter 4 begins with the birth of the first twins (see part 3), and we take up now the account of the first murderer, beginning with 4:3:Gen 4:3 "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. (4:4) And Abel, he so brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: (4:5) But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth,and his countenance fell." (KJV)

Many have failed to see why Cain's offering was not acceptable. Yet, it is clearly written why. God requires a blood sacrifice. True, you say, but the law was not yet given about the blood sacrifice! Yes it was, my friend. It was not only previously written, it was also demonstrated by God Himself. How do you think Abel knew? WHERE is it written, you protest, PROVE it!

OK, look at Gen 3:21: "Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins,and clothed them." (KJV) Do you think for a moment that those animals gave up their skins without losing both their lives and their blood? Thus, in plain sight it is written right here that God Himself showed Adam and Eve the acceptable requirement for forgiveness. In this case it was both a physical "covering" as well as a spiritual one acceptable to God.

Now think for just a moment. Can you imagine what an impression this act must have made on Adam and Eve? They had NEVER seen ANY death up till this time, yet here is some totally innocent being shedding it's blood for THEIR sins. Does this remind you of something? It should remind you of Christ who came through Adam and Eve's offspring to pay for all of the sins of all mankind. Surely, Adam and Eve told Cain and Abel what God expected, but Abel alone believed. Cain wanted to do it his own way. Cain felt, just like his progeny the Kenites feel today, that whenever the WORD of God doesn't agree with what they think then they are right and God is wrong.

Scottish children. Tsk tsk. Well, Cain didn't like it one bit (4:5), when God accepted Abel's sacrifice and rejected his (4:4). God did not chastise Cain, (4:6), but (4:7) offered him advice and showed him the way to be acceptable, but to no avail. So Cain (4:8) "talked" to his brother, Abel, killed him, and then tried to lie TO GOD(4:9) about it.? WOULD YOU TRUST A KENITE TO TELL YOU GOD'S WORD.

Now, my friends, we will see why the Kenites are also called 'riders'.(from the word "Rechab" as used in 1 Chr 2:55). "And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites,the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the KENITES that came of Hemath, the father of the house of RECHAB." 1 CHR 2:55 (KJV)Strong's # 7017 Qeyniy (kay-nee'); or Qiyniy (1 Chron. 2:55)(kee-nee'); patronymic from 7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe ofKajin: KJV-- Kenite.The root word 7014 is: Strong's # 7014 Qayin (kah'-yin); the same as 7013 (with a play upon the affinity to 7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV-- Cain, Kenite (-s).Strong's # 7394 Rekab (ray-kawb'); from 7392; rider; Rekab, the name of two Arabs and of two Israelites: KJV-- Rechab. The root 7392 is: Strong's # 7392 rakab (raw-kab'); a primitive root; to ride (on an animal or in a vehicle); causatively, to place upon (for riding or generally), to despatch: KJV-- bring (on [horse-] back), carry, get[oneself] up, on [horse-] back, put, (cause to, make to) ride (in achariot, on, -r), set.

Now, Cain's occupation at the first was as a farmer.(Gen 4:2) It wasteth way Cain made his living. We see in 4:12 that God removed this option: Cain would NEVER sow any more seeds which would bring forth food. Don't let THIS point go over your head. Think of the parables of teaching that Jesus used. (See Matt 13 for several examples)To this day, Kenites make their living from the labor of others. They make their living with usury (interest), and with vain flowing words,(lies, even religious lies), and with politics such as the NEW WORLD ORDER (taxes) but never with 'the sweat of their brow' as Adam and his offspring does (Gen 3:19).

My friends, the KENITES make their living by 'riding' (rechab) on the backs of the labor of everyone else.In Gen 4:13-17 we find several striking things. 1) Cain was afraid of being killed. (4:14). If there were no other people ( i.e. the sixth day creation), just who would kill him? We see from Gen 5:3 and 4 that there was no other Adamic (eighth day) offspring. Cain feared the ones of the sixth day creation, to be sure. It was from these peoples that Cain knew his wife (4:17). Cain received a 'mark' of protection from God Himself (4:15). 3)

Cain built a CITY (4:17).Isn't this strange? A CITY! Who would there be to live in it if there were no other people? What good would a CITY be? Who on earth would feed him while he built it? Have you ever tried to lay bricks and mix mud by yourself? It ain't easy. Have you ever considered the logistics of gathering materials for the streets, buildings and walls? God's WORD is never the less true and exact. Cain built a city. Common sense will tell most that Cain had considerable help from the sixth day crew, however.What do you suppose enabled a FARMER to know HOW to build a city, or for that matter, what a CITY even was? How did he know how to figure weights, measures and angles? How did he survive on his own?

I believe the key is in the mark placed upon him by God. I believeth this mark was knowledge and the superiority knowledge brings to people. Cain was readily accepted by the sixth day people because he could tell them how to farm, tell them how to train animals to work,as well as teach them much subtility in the use of weapons, how to kill your brother tribes and get their goods, etc. All for a price, however, all for a price. We come now to the listing in Genesis chapter 4 of the progeny of Cain.

Note first that Cain has his own genealogy, and it is listed separately from that of Adam (ch 5) which we will cover in the next part. The reason should be plain to all by now. CAIN WAS NOT ADAM'S SON. Cain was Satan's son. (Jn 8:44, 1 Jn 3:12) Secondly, you should notice, with care, how the names of Cain's offspring of Gen 4 so closely imitates the names of Adams children in Gen 5. This fact should cause a bell to ring in your mind.

The Kenites are great impersonators. They like to pose as great men of God. They were the ones who ran the church when Jesus came. (Matt chapter 23 and John chapter 8). Their father killed the first begotten son of Adam. They killed the first begotten Son of God, and they sow confusion among God's people to this day to keep them from knowing the truth. Strange but very true, my friend, strange but true. Some of the above are the words of man. Never take the words of any man without proving them for yourself in the only true WORD. May the Holy Spirit lead you in your search.

BIBLICAL CREATION THE SEED OF THE WOMAN

In part 4 we talked about the 'serpent's seed', and traced Cain's genealogy through God's Word from its beginning in Genesis to its end in the book of Revelation. The mere fact that there is an adversary to God's plan of salvation is easily accepted. The revelation that such an adversary has PHYSICAL offspring among us is a more difficult treatise, but the fact that God ALLOWS such an abomination to co-exist with us is just unthinkable to many. Nevertheless, it is a true fact as we have shown. One may not understand why, but it is only because they have not used their own minds,but have allowed the traditions of man to serve as their interpreter of God's WORD.

Think about it. We began this series with a 2 part thesis which I will reiterate here: Thesis part (A) ALL OF GOD'S WORD IS TRUE. Thesis part (B) SOME OF MAN'S WORD IS TRUE. We will continue using the same rules. The offspring of the serpent and the woman is first mentioned in Gen 3:15: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel." (KJV)

Is not this a promise by the Living God? The message is so clear even a child can understand. Notice first of all who God was talking to. (previous verse:{3:14} "...God said unto the serpent.."). The message is to Satan. God does not talk to the woman until 3:16. Now pause and think a minute. If this is God's Word, are not the serpent's seed (children) still here with us? Of course they are. We identified them in Part 4 as the Kenites. The seed (children) of the woman are thus set at odds against the seed (children) of the serpent. Notice something else about 3:15. God said that HE (GOD) would put 'enmity' between the children. This word is Strong's # 342'eybah (ay-baw'); from 340; hostility: KJV-- enmity, hatred. The root word is Strong's # 340 'ayab (aw-yab'); a primitive root; to hate (as one of an opposite tribe or party); hence to be hostile: KJV-- be an enemy. God also made a prediction about the children. GOD said (Gen 3:15) "that the seed of the woman would 'bruise' the head of the serpent's seed, and that the serpent's seed would 'bruise' the heel of the woman's seed".

The word 'bruise' is Strong's # 7779 shuwph (shoof); a primitive root; properly, togape, i.e. snap at; figuratively, to overwhelm: KJV-- break, bruise, cover.The word 'head' is Strong's # 7218 ro'sh (roshe); from an unused root apparently meaning to shake; the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itc.):KJV-- band, beginning, captain, chapiter, chief (-est place, man, things),company, end, X every [man], excellent, first, forefront, ([be-]) head,height, (on) high (-est part, [priest]), X lead, X poor, principal, ruler,sum, top. The word 'heel' is Strong's # 6119 `aqeb (aw-kabe'); or (feminine)`iqqebah (ik-keb-aw'); from 6117; a heel (as protuberant); hence, a track;figuratively, the rear (of an army): KJV-- heel, [horse-] hoof, last, lier inwait [by mistake for 6120], (footstep). The root word is Strong's # 6117aqab (aw-kab'); a primitive root; properly, to swell out or up; used only as denominative from 6119, to seize by the heel; figuratively, to circumvent (asif tripping up the heels); also to restrain (as if holding by the heel):KJV-- take by the heel, stay, supplant, X utterly. (DIC)All this is presented in detail so we may grasp the following truths.1)

God promised both continuing destiny and a continued hostility between the offspring of the serpent and the woman. This hostility began in earnest when Cain slew Abel.2) From the time God made this promise, we accept that for it to be fulfilled, BOTH the seed of the woman and the serpent's seed must be preserved PURE until the end, which we find in the book of Revelation chapter 20, where the serpents seed is finally destroyed. PLEASE don't let these points get over your head. See the parable of the sower (Matt 13:24-30) and Jesus' very plain explanation (only to those that will HEAR) in Matt 13:36-43.

What can we know from Gen 3:15 and the words of the Master in Matthew? We MUST see that not only were BOTH seedlines here, after the flood, but they continue to this day after the works of their fathers (read John 8, esp. 8:44). Keep this in mind as we study about the flood in part 6. The second genealogy is that of Adam, given in Gen 5. It is significant that the serpent's genealogy is listed first (in Gen 4), because it brings out the further truth spoken by Jesus in Matt 19:30 "But many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first." Hence the seed of the woman will be first in the kingdom of heaven. Continuing on with the seedline of Adam, we see that it continued with Seth (Gen 5:4), because Abel was murdered and Cain was not Adams seed.

I have previously mentioned that we should notice the similarity of the names of Adam's children and the names of Cain's children in chapter 4. We should see from this how the serpent's seed loves to mimic the children of God. Their works, however, give them away. They do have great words that sound (to the lazy) very Biblical. They love to be thought of as "great men of the LORD". The problem is that they are mighty men of the WRONG lord. We must be wiser than the serpent and use only God's Word as our guide. Don't be misled by these Kenites and their false doctrine, the commentaries of man. Jesus taught often how we were to handle them. He did NOT say to destroy them.

Gen. 4:15 "And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him."(KJV) Are you now beginning to see what Cain's mark was? Jesus told us: LEAVE THEM ALONE! (Matt 13:28-30) 28: "He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? 29:But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. 30:Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first theatres, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn." (KJV)

Jesus also told us (Matt 7:15-20) that we were to be fruit inspectors.15 "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. (KJV) He said" by their fruits will you know them". Don't miss the mention here in Matthew of the 'good and bad trees'.

This should point your mind straight to Gen 2:9, the two trees in the garden. Have you smelled any bad apples lately? Our Master gave us instruction on how to deal with them God's way: Matt. 10:16 "Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves."

Finally, our Master gave us a great example lesson when the serpent's seed came to take Jesus for crucifixion : Matt 26:52 "Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword: Remember God's words in Gen 4:15 "DON'T KILL CAIN". Jesus said to Peter, DON'T KILL CAIN'S CHILDREN. Thus, we are to IDENTIFY them, TEACH truth against them, resist wholly by the word of GOD, but to otherwise LEAVE THEM ALONE. As we see the New World Order of the Kenites come into existence right before our eyes, we would do well to remember and to follow Jesus' example. Let God do the physical fighting. He has promised He would. "IT IS WRITTEN,VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY, Saith the LORD". (Rom 12:19)

Within the seedline of Adam, we see ALL the great men of God to the birth of the promised one- JESUS the Messiah, the SON OF GOD. One is tempted to stop the seedline with Jesus, but God's Word doesn't. You see, there have been many forks in the seedline. At each of these forks, the Kenites have done their best to destroy it. They did not succeed, nor will they ever. We see one fork with the story of Noah. This one is amazing, and will be treated in the next part. The second fork was with Noah's children.

<>Another major one was with Peleg. The one we are most familiar with was Abraham, then Isaac,and finally Jacob and Esau. The story of the seedline from Abraham is probably the one that is most misunderstood. Some commentary-educated theologists call Abraham a Jew.Some call him an Israelite. Very few know that Abraham was a Hebrew (Gen. 14:13). He was neither an Israelite nor a Jew, for Israel (Jacob) was his grandson, and Judah was his great-grandson! Do we not see from this that the children of Abraham were all Hebrews? Do we forget that Abraham had SEVEN sons OTHER than Isaac? (Gen 16:16), Gen 25:1-2). ALL these and their offspring are Hebrews, but NONE of these are either Israelites nor Jews. You see, God promised Abraham that Abraham's offspring would be numbered as the sand of the sea, the stars of heaven (Gen 22:17), and the dust of the earth(Gen 13:16) These predictions yield startling conclusions to thinking persons.

Lets see now: "the sand of the sea". Hmm... Isn't that the place that John saw the Beast rise from? SURE IS. Rev 13:1 "And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy." (KJV) How about "the dust of the earth"? Hmmm.. Didn't we just read that in Gen. 3:14? SURE DID "And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou headstone this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and DUST SHALT THOU EAT all the days of thy life: (KJV)Satan's little ones eat everything we produce, or at least they try to.How about "the stars of heaven"? HMMM...yessss.. Daniel 12. Jesus tells Daniel to seal the book but the wise shall understand. in Dan 12:3 we find" And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. (KJV)

Thus we see God's prediction that most of Abraham's seed would do the work of the Kenite, by being deluded into worshiping the ways of this world. I say most, for it is probable that the combination of the dust of the earth and the sand of the seashore vastly out number the 'stars of heaven'. Something to think about anyway. It would not be proper to leave the subject of Adam's seed without pointing out something else. Namely, God promised that Abraham's seed would Gen. 22:17-18: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; 18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice. (KJV)

God passed this promise to Jacob when he changed his name to Israel Gen 28:14 "And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed." (KJV) Who passed it to Josephs children, Ephraim and Manasseh in Gen 48: 16 The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth. 17 And when Joseph saw that his father laid his right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father's hand, to remove it from Ephraim's head unto Manasseh's head. 18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my father: for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head. 19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations. 20 And he blessed them that day, saying, In thee shall Israel bless, saying, God make thee as Ephraim and as Manasseh: and he set Ephraim before Manasseh. (KJV)

Notice especially verse 16 "LET MY NAME BE NAMED ON THEM"!! WHO?? Ephraim and Manasseh, that's WHO. Joseph's children are ISRAEL, which in the Hebrew is 'the people of GOD' Look it up. Now man tells you that THE JEWS are God's people. But as you can see from the first verse of Gen 49, it is Jacob who blesses Judah and the rest of the tribes. The WORD is showing us that his Blessing name of Israel has already been given away: TO EPHRAIM AND MANASSEH. Now these promises God gave Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are absolutely wonderful, and are physical, national blessings. If you listen to man, he will tell you it is the Jews that got them. Such trash. You would have to believe God lied to believe that. No, my friend, look at the nations of the earth today. You should be able to find God's people. They would be the ones who would be a blessing in the earth to other nations; They would possess the gates of their enemies'. They would be a Christian nation. They would feed the earth with their bounty. They would have vast natural resources. They would spend time and effort to send missionaries into the earth. They would be the envy of all nations. Hmmm. Look in the mirror, and give God thanks.

Biblical Creation -- Part 6

The Flood and the aftermath--It is amazing to me how few people will actually study the WORD of GOD using their own grey matter and the study tools available. Most people would not DREAM of letting some "great man of reputation" handle their check book for them, or tell them what possessions they are allowed to own or how they must live their personal lives. Yet these same people have no apparent problem with allowing "great men of reputation" to tell them how to believe God's Word. Knowledge of our Father's Word is the most important thing any of us can possess. Don't allow man to rob you of this blessing. STUDY GOD'S WORD. YOU AND GOD MAKE A MAJORITY We will cover the following points in this final part:1) The presence on the earth of the various races BEFORE and AFTER the flood, including the Kenites (Cain = Serpent Seed = son of satan).2) The REASON for the flood.3) The WAY God saved ALL races for posterity.4)

The character of Noah's offspring and the nature of Ham's son, (Cush)Canaan. We are all familiar with man's account of the flood. Most have been taught by man's understanding that all of mankind except Noah and seven others were destroyed, and as a corollary to this, all of the present day races originated with Noah's children. Not only is this teaching absurd to anyone who will use their own brain, it is in itself AN ADMISSION BY CHRISTIANS THAT EVOLUTION IS TRUE. What is meant by this statement is that many of man's favorite commentaries state "environmental factors must have played a role in the present skin color and physical attributes of the many races." This is blatant admission BY "CHRISTIANS" that man mutates just like the evolutionists claim he does. God's Word does not even conceive the thought that man physically mutates. i.e. Gen 2:21 "And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;(KJV)

The word here translated 'ribs' is H6763, 'tsela' which is from the root word Strong's # 6760 tsala` (tsaw-lah'); a primitive root: probably tocurve; used only as denominative from 6763, to limp (as if one-sided): KJV--halt. (DIC) This is particularly interesting in light of the account of the creation of woman; For example, as we see in the creation of the sixth day peoples in Gen 1:27, both male and female were created by God, and at the same time. In the eighth day forming of Adam, however, it is quite clear that originally Adam was alone, and God made special animals and plants for him BEFORE the female EVE was brought forth. As we see in verses 2:21-22, apparently Eve was created from the SAME DNA that Adam possessed. This Hebrew word 'curve' thus brings to mind the familiar picture of the 'curve' present in the DNA double helix of all mankind. This DNA strand thus carries the genetic signature determining the physical characteristics of every subsequent generation of offspring. KIND AFTER KIND.

Why is he stressing this, you may ask. Is he some kind of racist? No, my friend, it was God who created the races. He loved them very much. He blessed them (1:28). God gave them all of His creation to possess. God was very pleased with them, just as He created them (1:31). So am I. The reason for stressing the separate identity of the races and their creation before the flood is to present the fact that the races are still here. Somehow, they got thru. It is important to understand the separate identity of the races to really see the lie put forth by man, who claims that sunshine and geography caused people to mutate and turn red, brown, black or yellow. Can you not see from God's Word the truth? In all of recorded history it is not known that ANY racial mutations have occurred. Don't be a part of the lie. Come out of Babylon.

In parts 3 and 4 we dwelt heavily on the offspring of the serpent's seed,the Kenites. We traced them from their flesh father Cain (Gen 4) to Gen. 15:19, through Numbers (24:21), Judges (1:16), 1 Chronicles (2:55), Jeremiah(ch 35, all) to John (8:44) and finally to Revelation (2:9 & 3:9). We traced them by using the Strong's dictionary to see that the English words 'Cain and 'Kenite is the single Hebrew word: Strong's # 7014 Qayin (kah'-yin); the same as 7013 (with a play upon the affinity to 7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV-- Cain, Kenite (-s). (DIC) This fact is important to keep this in mind as we discuss the flood, because the WORD is clear: The Kenites got on the other side of the flood. Like wise the various races came through the flood. They are all with us today, aren't they? Before we see how God's Word itself tells us how the Kenites and the other races got thru the flood, (yes it is written right here in Genesis) let us first ask ourselves some questions.

God himself promised a sevenfold punishment on anyone who killed Cain; Gen. 4:15 "And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him." He (God) even put a protective 'mark on Cain to protect him!1) Would God then kill Cain or his progeny? Cain was already guilty of unrepentant murder and blasphemy in Gen 4:15.

For God to kill Cain God would have to go back on His Word. This is not a possibility, because;2) God promised Cain's father (Satan) that God "would place enmity between the seed of the woman and his (Satan's) seed." (Gen 3:15) The word 'seed is 'zara', or offspring - see Strong's H#2233. For this to be true, as all of God's Word is, BOTH the seed of Satan and the seed of the woman must exist on both sides of the flood, and does, in fact as we have already shown, to this day. The Word clearly teaches that the Salvation offered by God through His Son Jesus is universally applicable to all mankind. Jesus is thus our 'Ark'. We will therefore see that God provided an ark for mankind via the hands of Noah, and this ark saved all mankind. In like manner, God uses teachers today, and sometimes in as strange a manner as the ark of Noah must have seemed to those peoples. The Word also states 'God never changes'(Ps 102:27),and that 'Jesus is the same forever'(Heb 13:8).

Yes my friends, God is true.So is His Word. ALL of it. Let us now look with open eyes into Gen chapter 6. We will first show the REASON for the flood. Although it is true that man was (and is also today) full of sin against God, there was a very special kind of sin being committed. Not only was man sinful, the purity of Adams seedline was virtually gone. If this seedline were to become totally corrupted, then God's promise of Gen. 3:15 would fail, for there would be none of Adam's seed left to fulfill the promise. Keep this thought in mind as we continue.

In the first two verses of chapter 6, we see the nature of the second attack on the seedline of Adam by Satan and his henchmen. We see that by the tenth generation (Noah's was 10th generation from Adam), the 'sons of God' had PHYSICALLY seduced the women of Adam's seedline to the point that only Noah's family's pedigree was unpolluted (6:9) by these fallen angels. These 'sons of God' were not flesh, any more than the 'son of God' who Nebuchanezzar saw walking with the 3 children in the furnace was flesh, (Dan. 3:25) or the 'sons of God' mentioned in Job (1:6, 2:1, or 38:7) or Psalms(29:1, 89:6) were flesh.

These were beings with spiritual bodies. These particular ones in Gen 6 were the spiritual messengers, or angels, of Satan. Jude, in verse 6, clearly points to an eruption of fallen angels, and states that their sin was of like manner as Sodom's in Jude 7. In addition, the time of one eruption of the fallen angels is given as being 'in the time of Noah' in 2 Peter 2:4-7. Though spiritual beings, these 'sons of God' had very physical attributes. So did most all of the spiritual beings who visited man. Remember the three who came to Abraham in the plain (Gen 18:8)and had supper with Abraham? In verse 4 we find that the words 'children' and 'became' are in italics, meaning that they are not in the manuscripts. When we leave them out and read the verse, we find that the offspring of these fallen angels and flesh women didn't "become" mighty men of old, they WERE the SAME as in old time.(Remember part 1 about Gen 1:2?). It was apparently a similar escapade by these fallen ones that caused the destruction of the 'world that then was' (2. Pet 3:6).If you are getting confused, reread part 1 of this series before continuing.

Continuing, we see that these half-breed hybrids were an abomination to God,who had ordered His creation to reproduce 'kind after kind'. (Gen ch 1) They were giants, certainly both in wickedness and in physical size. They would certainly eventually exterminate ALL of Adam's children. God chose to intervene to destroy these giants, by a flood of water. Note that God would certainly have no need to destroy any of mankind as he created it, but only as it had become corrupt in it's kind. These 'giants' were a "creation" of Satan. They were not of God. God would not need to destroy mankind merely because of sin, because He had promised to send a Messiah. When the seedline that God promised would bring forth the Messiah became in danger of extinction, He acted to preserve His Word. He always will.

Notice verse 7 of Genesis 6. "And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them." Here God apparently says He will destroy the complete creation,man and beast. Did He? Of course not. The word 'said' is Strong's # 559 'a man (aw-mar'); a primitive root; to say (used with great latitude): KJV-- answer, appoint, avouch, bid, boastself, call, certify,challenge, charge, + (at the, give) command (-ment), commune, consider,declare, demand, X desire, determine, X expressly, X indeed, X intend, name, X plainly, promise, publish, report, require, say, speak (against, of), X still, X suppose, talk, tell, term, X that is, X think, use [speech], utter, X verily, X yet. In verses 8 and 9, we see that Noah alone was both 'just', and 'perfect in his generations', and thus found 'grace in God's sight'.

These little words and phrases are gigantic. 'Just' is the Hebrew 'tsadach', or ZADOK, the rough equivalent to the 'Elect' of the new testament. Noah believed God.The word 'just' is Strong's # 6662 tsaddiyq (tsad-deek'); from 6663; just: KJV-- just, lawful,righteous (man). ***. Tsidoniy. See 6722. This word is from the same root as Strong's # 6659 Tsadowq (tsaw-doke'); from 6663; just; Tsadok, the name of eight or nine Israelites: KJV-- Zadok.

The phrase 'perfect in his generations' means, quite simply, He had not mixed with these fallen ones, and had a clean "pedigree" going back to Adam, 'the seed of the woman '. The Hebrew is two words, Strong's # 8549 tamiym (taw-meem'); from 8552; entire (literally,figuratively or morally); also (as noun) integrity, truth: KJV-- without blemish, complete, full, perfect, sincerely (-ity), sound, without spot,undefiled, upright (-ly), whole. and,Strong's # 8435 towledah (to-led-aw'); or toledah (to-led-aw'); from 3205;(plural only) descent, i.e. family; (figuratively) history: KJV-- birth,generations. Now we should see a very special point. Because Noah was pure Adamic, His children were also. They apparently were THE LAST ones of Adamic man that was of pure pedigree. (vv 9-10)

If God's mission was to preserve the seedline in a pure sense until the birth of Messiah (Gen 3:15) THEN HOW COULD NOAH'S CHILDREN BEGET OTHER RACES? They obviously could not, else they could not have been pure to start with. God's Word says they were of pure linage. God also said KIND after KIND-- remember? ALL of NOAH's Children as well as their offspring were therefore pure Adamic. Believe God. Ok. If this is the case, then HOW did the Kenites and the sixth day creation get through the flood? Answer--- On the Ark. The same way any person will be saved today. On the ark of God,

Jesus. Look if you will at Gen 6:3 "And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. (KJV) Notice the phrase 'he also is flesh'. It is most important for what follows. Man is declared to be flesh, which should be no big deal. EXCEPT--Look at the instructions God gave Noah in Gen 6:19 "And of every living thing of ALL FLESH, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female." Not ONLY here, but in EVERY subsequent passage (7:16,7:23, 8:17), God repeats it: "TWO OF ALL FLESH", the male and his female. Just like God combines all flesh in Gen 6:7 "And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.", He combines them when He instructs Noah. Why is it's so hard to understand the truth?

Why must man teach the traditions of the Pharisees and the lies of the Kenites? Why will people continue to believe them in the face of God's Word and common sense? I just don't know. The flood story just would not be complete unless we refute another lie of man. What have you been taught from the cemeteries about the nature or skin color of Canaan, the son of Ham? What have you been taught about the nature of Ham's sin? We see the first mention of this fellow Canaan in Gen 9:18. It seems out of context, placed here. Noah as we see in 9:25 curses this fellow Canaan because of what his father, Ham, did.

Does this seem strange to you? It should the way man presents the story. Why should a son get the blame for what a father did? This is totally against God's Will. See the whole chapter of Eze. 18, as well as Deut 24:16 "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin." (KJV) Well, God did not curse Canaan. Noah his grandfather did. Why would Noah curse this first born after all the death he had just witnessed? As it turns out, this Canaan was an incestuous son, born of Ham and his mother, Noah's wife. Preposterous, you say? No my friend, truth.

Noah made wine, and got drunk. He was living it up after the year he had just been through, and Noah let down his guard. (Gen 9:20-21) Here we see a strange (to us) thing. Gen 9:22 "And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. (KJV)" What is the sin, we ask, dumbfounded. What is so sinful about seeing a drunk old man lying naked?

Now the cemetery teachers will say things like,Ham 'laughed at him', or 'Ham was a homosexual', or 'Ham had no respect', or something equally absurd. The Hebrew phrase "to uncover someone's nakedness" has a very special meaning. Let us look at Lev 18:8 "The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness. (KJV) "Well, you say, that is perhaps a suggestion, but I don't know...Ok, How about Lev 20:11 "And the man that lieth with his father's wife hathun covered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.(KJV)" Is that language plain enough? According to the Word, Canaan was an incestuous offspring.

OK, now let me ask you what RACE Canaan was? Was he black, red, yellow, white, brown, oradamic? If you answered 'Adamic, go to the head of the class. Of course Canaan was Adamic, because BOTH of his parents were, and they were just like Noah, 'perfect in their pedigree' (Gen 6:9-10) from Adam, the eighth day man. Pay special attention to these "Canaanites", as you study the Word. They gave Abraham and Israel a lot of trouble for a long time. Then they joined with the Kenites, and had completely taken over the temple service by the time the second ADAM, Jesus came. They killed Him. They are the ones today who give our true brother Judah a hard time, Rev 2:9 "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich)and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. (KJV)"Rev 3:9 "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

Only these two of the seven churches received no condemnation from our LORD.Look at what they recognized. They knew who the Kenites were. Do you? Does your "church" teach about them? As you continue on in your studies, don't be afraid to follow the leading of God's Holy Spirit. Use your mind and the original languages to expose the lies. Don't expect people in today's theological cemeteries to be pleased with your insight, though. Most will reject truth, just like they rejected Jesus in His day, and as Jesus said they would in our day. God's Truth, my friends, is much stranger than man's fiction.

God Bless You!!!
Bob Seller

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest