DEBUNKING JOE FARAH OF WORLD NET DAILYs JEWISH FABLES

American Free Press
Idaho Observer
Barnes Review
Free American
Anti-Shyster
Jubileh
Media ByPass
and many others that you may run across

pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

DEBUNKING JOE FARAH OF WORLD NET DAILYs JEWISH FABLES

Post#1 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:14 pm

DEBUNKING JOE FARAH OF WORLD NET DAILYs JEWISH FABLES

By Rev. Ted Pike
12 July 10


The Bible warns Christians to ignore “Jewish fables.” (Titus 1:14) In 1948 Israel
violently drove half of the Arab population from Palestine, stealing land on which they
had lived and farmed for thousands of years. To distract the world from this outrage,
Israel created an elaborate tapestry of fables deluding generations of evangelicals and
much of the world.

The most audacious claim of such propaganda is that the Palestinians were not deprived of
their land because the Palestinians as a land-owning people never existed! They never
inhabited Palestine in significant numbers and only entered in the 20 th century as
squatters, benefitting from the hospitality and prosperity of Israel. Zionist mythology
also teaches that the number of Jews living in much of Palestine, especially in
Jerusalem, always exceeded the Arabs, strengthening Israel’s right to remain the dominant
occupant.

The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem explains Israel’s strategy:

“In order to create an alleged justification for the crime of genocide they have
committed against the Palestinian Arabs, the Zionists have tried to convince the world
that Palestine was practically uninhabited, ‘A Land Without People For a People Without a
Land.’ They created and propagated the myths that the Palestinian Arabs were nomads or
semi-nomads without a culture and a civilization, that the Palestinians had neither a
national identity nor existence, that the Palestinians lacked an economic structure and
roots in the land.” [1]

Those accepting these lies include Joseph Farah, owner and editor-in-chief of
WorldNetDaily. In his recent article “The Phony Mideast Debate,” he says, “Today,
billions of people all over the world actually believe that the ‘Palestinians’ are just
in their quest for a homeland they never knew, a homeland that never existed, a homeland
that is as fictitious as their rewritten historical narrative.”

Farah claims that Palestine, even after World War II, was “still largely unpopulated,
untamed, undeveloped,” with most of the inhabitants of Jerusalem and adjacent regions
being Jewish. Most Arabs, he says, became interested in coming to this near-wasteland
only after Zionists brought economic and agricultural prosperity. They then flooded in as
migrants from Jordan and other Mideast countries "coinciding with Jewish immigration and
ingenuity."

Zionist propaganda also claims that when war became imminent between the Israelis and
Arabs in 1948, this large indigent population of about 800,000, possessing no loyalty to
the land, fled to safer countries. After the war, Israel says they then preposterously
claimed they were driven out of their "homeland," a land they never owned! Israel, says
Farah, has been falsely “recast in the public’s mind as Goliath,” persecuting the
Palestinian outcasts and occupying their ancestral property.

“This is not occupation, as the world suggests." Farah contends, "This is a people
defending their one and only homeland against the most vicious and unjustified attacks
imaginable.”

From Farah to Facts

In 1882, the Jewish population of Palestine was about 24,000. In 1914, the entire
population of Palestine was estimated at 634,133 Muslim and Christian Arabs and 55,413
Jews. In 1920, after the British mandate, the official census showed the Arab population,
both Muslim and Christian, at nearly 600,000, still greatly exceeding the Jews, who
numbered 66,574. Until 1948 the Arab population continued to exceed the Jewish by roughly
2:1. [2] Farah says Jews for centuries had dominated the region, "the majority of the
population of Jerusalem and surrounding areas being Jewish." Yet the last official
British census in 1931 found Arabs in Jerusalem outnumbered Jews 2:1 with surrounding
areas averaging 98% Arab! The Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question in the United
Nations found in 1948 that, except for Haifa, "the Arabs have a clear majority over the
Jews." [3]

So much for the Israeli/Farah claim that for centuries Jews in Jerusalem and surrounding
areas have outnumbered a tiny Arab population!

During World War I, Arabs fought with the Allies against the Turks in hope of acquiring
national independence. After the Balfour Declaration in 1917, the people of Palestine
were considered by the League of Nations a “provisionally independent nation” very close
to sovereignty. By 1947 Palestinian Arabs played a predominant role in government under
the British. “The total number of government officials was 44,688 persons, of whom 4,314
were British, 30,178 Arabs, 9,276 Jews, and 920 others.” [4] Arabs also vastly
outnumbered Jews in municipal councils and leadership in hundreds of primarily Arab towns
and cities throughout Palestine.

The land of Palestine had been a breadbasket of agricultural plenty going back to the
original inhabitants, the Canaanites and later Philistines (for whom Palestine is named).
Enjoying a climate similar to California’s, the Old Testament description was a “land
that flows with milk and honey.” Certainly, much of Palestine in recent centuries had
been over-grazed, particularly the mountainous hill country of Judea surrounding
Jerusalem. Such barrenness caused visitor Mark Twain to describe it as barren, with
hardly an Arab to be seen. Yet, at nearly the same time, “Lawrence Oliphant, who visited
Palestine in 1887, wrote that Palestine’s Valley of Esdraelon was ‘a huge green lake of
waving wheat, with its village-crowned mounds rising from it like islands; and it
presents one of the most striking pictures of luxurious fertility which it is possible to
conceive.’” [5] Numerous pre-20th century accounts, recounted in the Encyclopedia of the
Palestine Problem, describe it as a veritable cornucopia of every kind of agricultural
produce, with excess exported by the Palestinians even to the nations of Europe.

The Encyclopedia confirms that before 1948

“these Arab towns and villages were not merely place names on a map. They were developed
communities containing farms, factories, stores and schools, with an infrastructure of
doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, merchants, mechanics, industrialists, workers, and
farmers which would be the envy of any developing country today…Before 1948 they resided
in 12 cities, 8 major towns, and 830 small towns and villages. Arab homes in the cities
were either luxurious stone villas with beautiful gardens, or apartments with 2-5
bedrooms. These residences were well-furnished with modern furniture and household goods.
No Arab home of the middle and upper classes contained less than eight valuable Persian
carpets. All these homes and their furnishings were usurped by Israel.” [6]

General Moshe Dayan tells the truth:

“We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a
Hebrew, that is, a Jewish state here. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab
villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you,
because these geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab
villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul; Gevat in the place
of Jibta; Sarid in the place of Haneifa and Kefar Yehoshua in the place of Tellshaman.
There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.”
[7]

After 1948, Israel took over 12 cities and large towns and 526 small towns and villages.
They bulldozed the towns and villages, building new towns with Jewish names. [8]

The Encyclopedia extensively documents from British records that, far from Palestinians
depending on Jewish prosperity, the Zionists were permeated with Marxist/collectivist
values, resulting in eventual failure of the "kibbutz" experiment. Fairly new to Mideast
agriculture, they were largely inefficient, dependent upon regular massive infusion of
Western Jewish capital. [9] Despite a general Israeli policy of boycott of Palestinian
goods and services, the Palestinians, with a rapidly growing population in 1948 of
1,444,274, were both politically, socially, and economically racing toward UN-sponsored
nationhood in 1948.

Zionist Terror Ends Palestinian Dreams

Such prosperity came to an abrupt, horrific end after the Deir Yassin massacre by Zionist
Irgun terrorists on April 9-10, 1948 and many subsequent Jewish outrages and atrocities,
panicking 800,000 Palestinians into flight. “In 1948 the Zionists seized 90% of
Arab-owned citrus groves, packaging and storage facilities, as well as that year’s crops,
looting the prosperous Arab citrus growers, making them destitute refugees.” The same was
true of all aspects of Palestinian industry, including olive oil, weaving, textile,
tobacco, leather, dairy, wheat, fishing, and construction. In reality, confiscation of
Palestinian resources largely constituted the “miracle” of Israel’s sudden abundant
agriculture, of which the new state began boasting soon after expulsion of the
Palestinians. This delighted evangelicals worldwide who saw it as stunning fulfillment of
Biblical prophecy, making the "desert blossom as the rose." In reality, Israel now
possessed thousands of acres of citrus, olives, wheat, etc. seized from the foremost
agriculturists of the Middle East, Palestinian orchardists and farmers. The Encyclopedia:
“The economic achievements of Israel today are built totally on the capital base of
lands, property, and possessions usurped from the Palestinian Arabs.” [10]

Is Israel’s massively documented theft of Palestinian land, as well as Palestinian demand
for compensation, really a “phony argument,” as Farah contends? For the safety of his
eternal soul, I sincerely hope he has spoken out of ignorance of what really happened in
1948 and has naively made himself the mouthpiece of Zionist lies. It is difficult,
however, to believe that Farah, himself of Syrian/Lebanese descent, does not know at
least something of the enormous magnitude of injustice towards the
Palestinians. If he does yet, continues to parrot Israel’s propaganda (perhaps to please
both evangelicals and Jews), there is little doubt where the real phoniness exists: in
Farah himself.



Footnotes:

The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, edited by Dr. Issa Nakhleh, Continental Books,
P.O. Box 756, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163-0756, p. 33. This two-volume
work, totaling about 1,800 pages, by this Christian Palestinian barrister and diplomat is
available in most university libraries and online at www.palestine-encyclopedia.com.
Ibid., p. 25.
Ibid., p. 26.
Ibid., p. 28.
Ibid., p. 33.
Ibid., p. 34.
Ibid., p. 34.
Ibid, p. 347.
Ibid., p. 49.
Ibid., p. 34.
In his article, Farah also endorses the Zionist heresy that a nation of Christ-rejecting
Jews can lawfully inhabit God's Holy Land. While God did promise the land to Abraham
because of his faith and continuing obedience, He also told the Hebrews that only by such
obedience could they enjoy the same covenant. God told them "because [emphasis mine] you
listen to these judgments and keep and do them… the Lord your God will keep with you His
covenant and His loving-kindness which He swore to your forefathers." (Deut. 7:12) In
dozens of clear Scriptures, God is emphatic that only by obedience could the Hebrews as a
people legitimately occupy Canaan. If they disobey, they will be expelled. Someday, a
believing remnant of Jews will give Christ such obedience. But for the present, a wicked,
Christian-persecuting Israel remains a counterfeit return. It is Babylon the Great, the
Great Harlot of Rev. 17, promoting ascent of anti-Christ, not Jesus Christ. (See,
'Babylon the Great' is Israel)

Scriptures laying down God's conditional terms for occupation include: Lev. 18:28,
26:27-46; Num. 14:23; Deut. 4:26-27; 6:18; 7:12; 28:21, 25, 37, 41, 56-64; 29:28; Deut.
30; Ezek. 13:9; Jer. 7:15; 29:13-14.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative
watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely
supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are
tax-deductible.



NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
www.truthtellers.org

pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Control of the Press

Post#2 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:15 pm

Control of the Press


1. The word "freedom," which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows -


Freedom is the right to do what which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid program.


We shall deal with the press in the following way: what is the part played by the press today? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties.

It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight curb: we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing press, for where would be the sense of getting rid of the attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and books?

The produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it, will be turned by us into a very lucrative source of income to our State: we shall law on it a special stamp tax and require deposits of caution-money before permitting the establishment of any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then have to guarantee our government against any kind of attack on the part of the press.

For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines secured by these deposits, will bring in a huge income to the government.

It is true that party organs might not spare money for the sake of publicity, but these we shall shut up at the second attack upon us. No one shall with impunity lay a finger on the aureole of our government infallibility.

The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification. I BEG YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY WILL ATTACK EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE-DETERMINED TO ALTER.

WE CONTROL THE PRESS


NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL.

Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world.
These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.


If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses.

If already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world ....


Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS.

Every one desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded.

With such measures THE INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS.

Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits....

All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest ....

FREE PRESS DESTROYED


We turn to the periodical press. We shall impose on it, as on all printed matter, stamp taxes per sheet and deposits of caution-money, and books of less than 30 sheets will pay double.

We shall reckon them as pamphlets in order, on the one hand, to reduce the number of magazines, which are the worst form of printed poison, and, on the other, in order that this measure may force writers into such lengthy productions that they will be little read, especially as they will be costly.

At the same time what we shall publish ourselves to influence mental development in the direction laid down for our profit will be cheap and will be read voraciously.
The tax will bring vapid literary ambitions within bounds and the liability to penalties will make literary men dependent upon us.

And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions in print the publisher or printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to do so.

Thus we shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing against us and shall nullify them by getting ahead with explanations on the subject treated of.


Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals.

This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind .... If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion.

This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.


In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.


In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.


In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, off position, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.


All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions - aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of course, as the constitution exists .... Like the Indian idol "Vishnu" they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required.

When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us.

In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.


In order to direct our newspaper militia in this sense we must take special and minute care in organizing this matter. Under the title of central department of the press we shall institute literary gatherings at which our agents will without attracting attention issue the orders and watchwords of the day.

By discussing and controverting, but always superficially, without touching the essence of the matter, our organs will carry on a sham fight fusillade with the official newspapers solely for the purpose of giving occasion for us to express ourselves more fully than could well be done from the outset in official announcements, whenever, of course, that is to our advantage.


THESE ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO SERVE ANOTHER PURPOSE, NAMELY, THAT OUR SUBJECTS WILL BE CONVINCED TO THE EXISTENCE OF FULL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND SO GIVE OUR AGENTS AN OCCASION TO AFFIRM THAT ALL ORGANS WHICH OPPOSE US ARE EMPTY BABBLERS, since they are incapable of finding any substantial objections to our orders.

ONLY LIES PRINTED


15. Methods of organization like these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government.

Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquilize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it ....

WE SHALL HAVE A SURE TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND FINAL EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the press.

We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.


Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, in case of need, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs.


Even nowadays, already, to take only the French press, there are forms which reveal masonic solidarity in acting on the watchword: all organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy; like the augurs of old, not one of their numbers will give away the secret of his sources of information unless it be resolved to make announcement of them.

Not one journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practice literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or other .... These sores would be immediately revealed.

So long as they remain the secret of a few the prestige of the journalist attacks the majority of the country - the mob follow after him with enthusiasm.


Our calculations are especially extended to the provinces. It is indispensable for us to inflame there those hopes and impulses with which we could at any moment fall upon the capital, and we shall represent to the capitals that these expressions are the independent hopes and impulses of the provinces.

Naturally, the source of them will be always one and the same - ours. WHAT WE NEED IS THAT, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WE ARE IN THE PLENITUDE POWER, THE CAPITALS SHOULD FIND THEMSELVES STIFLED BY THE PROVINCIAL OPINION OF THE NATIONS, I.E., OF A MAJORITY ARRANGED BY OUR AGENTUR.

What we need is that at the psychological moment the capitals should not be in a position to discuss an accomplished fact for the simple reason, if for no other, that it has been accepted by the public opinion of a majority in the provinces.


WHEN WE ARE IN THE PERIOD OF THE NEW REGIME TRANSITIONAL TO THAT OF OUR ASSUMPTION OF FULL SOVEREIGNTY WE MUST NOT ADMIT ANY REVELATION BY THE PRESS OF ANY FORM OF PUBLIC DISHONESTY; IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE NEW REGIME SHOULD BE THOUGHT TO HAVE SO PERFECTLY CONTENDED EVERYBODY THAT EVEN CRIMINALITY HAS DISAPPEARED...

Cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses - no more.

pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

FARAH BLASTS ADL (KIND OF) bwahahahaha NOT!

Post#3 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:59 pm

zio-shill Farah, shows that he is even a bigger semite sensitive then the POS of the ADL.
Its sad to see supposed Americans grovel at this anti-American terrorist outfit. One of the main groups bent on destroying our Constitution. So lets see what this zio-shill Farah has to say this week.
pk

FARAH BLASTS ADL (KIND OF)
By Rev. Ted Pike
10 Aug 10
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/farahblastsadl.htm


As Orthodox rabbis Daniel Lapin and Nachum Shifren testify, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League is in relentless attack against Christian conservatives. ADL attempts to foment persecution of Christians through their “anti-hate” laws and claims that Bible believers are “anti-Semitic”. (See, The ADL vs. Faith and Freedom and Rabbi Lapin: Christians Under 'Relentless Attack' by 'Secular Judaism') WorldNetDaily owner Joseph Farah is increasingly aware of this assault. He recently wrote that ADL is “busy persecuting people like me” who question the legitimacy of the Obama presidency and stand for traditional American values.

Unfortunately, Farah doesn’t defend himself with the whole truth. Instead of exposing Jewish supremacy’s agenda, he seeks to outdo the zeal of the League itself in defaming those who criticize Israel! His recent article claims in effect, “ADL, I’m no threat. I’m even more against anti-Semites than you!”

Farah says ADL should be focusing on the Democrat party, where “anti-Semitic” words about Jewish donor money recently leaked from Rep. Mike McMahon’s office. McMahon implied—as almost everybody on the Hill knows—that massive donations from wealthy Jews guarantee unconditional support of Israel from members of Congress who receive it. (Jews, 2% of the American population, supply 60% of campaign contributions to the Democrat party; 20 to 35 percent of contributions to the Republican party.) (Jewish Power Campaign Contributions, www.occidentaldissent.com)

ADL immediately demanded an apology from McMahon and, as quickly, received it. Yet Farah is disgusted with ADL’s mercy. He would have preferred even more browbeating, forcing McMahon to grovel. Instead of siding with the whole truth, Farah seeks shelter in the unconditional philo-Semitism with which the religious right is so comfortable.

But there is a death trap in such appeasement. If there is growing “anti-Semitism” among Democrats, it comes from mounting and correct moral outrage at Israel’s misbehavior, especially in Gaza. Today, the Zionist lobby must increasingly rely on Republicans and conservatives who will accept Jewish funds in exchange for blind support of Israel. Zionist “hush money” buys favors, protection and endorsement for a foreign power with a sordid history of human rights violations and war crimes. It has flouted international law for more than 60 years and criminalized the very Christian evangelism so important to the religious right.

It borders on treason for any member of our government to allow their foreign policy decisions to be affected by receipt of money from Zionist interests. Such politicians become de facto agents of Israel, violating the 1937 Foreign Agents Registration Act which requires all lobbyists for a foreign power to declare themselves. Tragically, the honorable choice—refusing to receive such contributions and swear implicit fealty to Israel—may incur the anger of many wealthy Jewish donors and the all-powerful lobby. Ex-House members such as Paul Findlay, Pete McClosky, and John Rarrick are victims of such Jewish vengeance.

Yet Farah and so many conservatives—bound by a false interpretation of God’s blessing on the Jews, and a deep fear of their increasing power and vindictiveness—choose appeasement over truth. Instead of criticizing the evils of the lobby and the Jewish state, they rush to be its most zealous defenders.

Farah blusters about McMahon: “Where is the ADL? Where are those supposedly dedicated to fighting anti-Jewish bigotry?” He says “the most vicious forms of anti-Semitism are alive and well in America today inside the Democratic party – inside the hearts and minds like McMahon. It’s disgusting, revolting, insidious… McMahon should be viewed from this day forward as a fringe lunatic unworthy of anyone’s consideration for a return to the House of Representatives…. Meanwhile, I’m putting the ADL on a notice that it had better get its act together.” Farah perfectly agrees with ADL that Jews should be shielded from scrutiny and disclosure in the political process to a degree not afforded others. Farah agrees with ADL thought police that even the mildest “bias” or unflattering truthtelling relative to Jews is very, very bad. Farah’s demand that McMahon be exiled to political oblivion reveals that he considers even-handed criticism of matters Jewish to be on a par with child-molestation.

Will such rabid anti-anti-Semitism shield Farah or other conservatives from the deadly fangs of ADL? No.

Farah is correct that ADL is out to get him—as he said last November, “the ADL is after me and my news organization.”

Despite his record as an inveterate boot-licker of Israel and the Jewish lobby, Farah has mortally offended ADL too many times. For the past five years, he has boldly opposed ADL’s hate crimes laws, publicizing their abuses in Canada and throughout the world. He consistently exposes persecution of Christians in America by Jewish attack groups including the Southern Poverty Law Center and ACLU. He castigates the (largely Jewish-dominated) abortion industry as well as Planned Parenthood. ADL considers this unforgivable; WorldNetDaily must be destroyed. You can be sure the League is already alienating WND advertisers and amassing an extensive dossier of information about Farah.

What can save Farah and other conservatives? Affirmations of support for Israel and Jews, surpassing even ADL in its hate for “anti-Semitism?” Hardly. Farah must do something he has evidently never done before: trust only in God and the whole truth. He must open his mind to the fact that all the greatest Hebrew prophets, including Christ, severely criticized evil Jews and were not anti-Semitic. God delights in those who speak the whole truth, especially to the lost house of Israel. Scripture prophesies the eventual redemption of a repentant Jewish remnant out of unbelieving Jewry. If Farah continues to dishonor God and his readers with half-truths and outright lies, not only ADL will despise him. God will have contempt for him and abandon him to his enemies.

I’m glad Farah wrote his recent article. It is progress since it mentions the terror-inspiring word “ADL” eight times. That’s eight times more than any other conservative leaders have had the nerve to utter it. Maybe soon another leader of the religious right will be encouraged by Farah’s sputtering, misfiring, self-protective article. Maybe he will muster courage to actually aim at the target.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest