History of the Synagog of Satan

Please use this box to talk about anything and everything - Guest Posting Dis-abled for now thanks to the assholes posting their Viagra & Casino PORN crap ADS here
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

History of the Synagog of Satan

Post#1 » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:19 am

History of the Synagog of Satan - Today they are represented by those calling themselves JEWs but are really imposters from KHAZARIA.

watch this video first
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php ... 0143776784

Zionism is a political ideology fabricated by Theodor Herzl, and the Rothschild family.
Historically, Judaism and the holocaust industry has been largely steered by the

The majority of people in Israel today are Ashkanazi Khazars descended from Eastern
Europe, ancient Prussia, Russia, etc. They are NOT semitic, Palestinians are the Semites
and the original inhabitance of ancient Palestine


NOTE THE References on page two:

1. Koestler, Arthur, The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage, New York:
Random House, 1976, p. 17
2. Dunlop, D. M., The History of the Jewish Khazars, Princeton University Press, 1954
3. Brook, Kevin Alan, The Jews of Khazaria, Jason Aronson, Inc. Northvale, NJ, Jerusalem,
4. Peter B. Golden, Khazar Studies, vol. 1 (Budapest: Akademiai, 1980), pp. 55-56.
5. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria
6. Bury, J. B., A History of the Eastern Roman Empire (London, 1912).
7. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 18.
8. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, p. 27
9. Artamonov, M. I., Khazar History (Leningrad, 1962). Koestler, The Thirteeth Tribe, p.
10. Bruce G. Trigger, A History of Archaeological Thought (Cambridge, England: Cambridge
UniversityPress, 1989), p. 207.
11. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, p. 3.
12. Ibid., p. 4
13. Peter B. Golden, An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Wiesbaden,
Germany, 1992.
14. Ibn-Said al-Maghribi, quoted by Dunlop, p. II. Dunlop, D. M., The History of the
Jewish Khazars (Princeton, 1954).
15. Omeljan Pritsak, The Khazar Kingdom's Conversion to Judaism, Harvard Ukrainian
Studies 3:2 (Sept, 1978): 271.
16. Andrew C. Gow, The Red Jews (Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1995), pp. 40-41.
17. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, p. 10. Andrew C. Gow, The Red Jews (Leiden, Netherlands:
E. J. Brill, 1995), p. 191.
18. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, pp. 10-11.
19. Ibid., p. 16
20. W. E. 0. Allen, A History of the Georgian People, London 1952.
21. Douglas M. Dunlop, The History of the Jewish Khazars, p. 113.
22. Tirmidhee, Abwaab al-Tafseer: Surat al-Kahf (Hadith 5160), 8/597-99; Ibn Maajah,
Kitaab al-Fitan, (Hadith 4080), 2/1364. Ahmad, Musnad, 2/510, 511.
23. Gibbon, B., The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol. V (2nd ed.,
London, 1901).
24. Ibid.
25. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 27]
26. Ibid., p. 27-8.
27. Ibid.
28. Dunlop, D. M., "Khazars" in Enc. Judaica, 1971-2 printing.
29. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 23-4.
30. Bury, J. B., A History of the Eastern Roman Empire, p. 120.
31. George Vernadsky, A History of Russia, Vol. 1 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
1948), p. 346.
32. Brook, Kevin Alan, The Jews of Khazaria, (Jason Aronson, Inc. Northvale, NJ,
Jerusalem), 1999.
33. Omeljan Pritsak, The Khazar Kingdom's Conversion to Judaism, pp. 278-9.
34. Dunlop, D. M., The History of the Jewish Khazars, p. 90 (Princeton, 1954). al-Bakri
(ob. 487/1094)
35. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 58.
36. Ibid.
37. Bury, J. B., A History of the Eastern Roman Empire, p. 406.
38. Ibid.
39. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, p. 126.
40. Yehuda HaLevi, The Kuzari, trans. N. Daniel Korobkin (Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson,
1998), p. 1.
41. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 66.
42. Ibid., p. 72-4.
43. McEvedy, C., The Penguin Atlas of Mediaeval History (1961).
44. Macartney, C. A., The Magyars in the Ninth Century (Cambridge, 1930).
45. Dunlop, D. M., The History of the Jewish Khazars (Princeton, 1954).
46. Baron, S. W., A Social and Relgious History of the Jews, Vols. III and IV (New York,
47. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 141, 144, 152.
48. Cecil Roth., "Jews" in Enc. Britannica, 1973 printing.
49. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 159.
50. Ibid., p. 15, 16.
51. A. N. Poliak, Khazaria -- The History of a Jewish Kingdom in Europe (Mossad Bialik,
Tel Aviv, 1951).
52. Kutschera, Hugo Freiherr von, Die Chasaren (Wien, 1910), Koestler, The Thirteenth
Tribe, p. 169.
53. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 172.
54. Mieses, M., Die Jiddische Sprache (Berlin-Wien, 1924).
55. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 179-80.
56. Ibid., p.17.
57. Barker, F., Crusades, Enc. Britannica, 14th ed., p. 772, 1973.
58. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 163.
59. Baron, S. W., A Social and Relgious History of the Jews, Vols. III and IV (New York,
60. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 164-7.
61. Ibid., p. 182.
62. Brook, The Jews of Khazaria, p. 300.
63. Hugo Freiherr von Kutschera, in Die Chasaren: Historische Studie (Vienna: A.
Holzhausen, 1910,) (English translation.)
64. Shapiro, H., "The Jewish People: A Biological History" (UNESCO, Paris, 1953).
65. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 177.
66. Baron, S. W., A Social and Religious History of the Jews, Vols. III and IV (New York,
67. Encyclopedia Americana, 1985 edition.
68. 13th Tribe, Appendix IV, p. 223.
69. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, Appendix IV, p. 224.
70. JVIM International, http://www.jvim.com/IntelligenceBriefin ... /wars.html
71. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book 1, Ch. 6.
72. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VI, 1909, (Robert Appleton Company).
73. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book 1, Ch. 2.
74. Alexander A. Vasiliev, The Goths in the Crimea (Cambridge, MA: The Mediaeval Academy
of America, 1936), p. 96.
75. Jewish Travellers, ed. Elkan N. Adler (London: George Routledge & Sons, 1930), p. 83.
76. Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, p. 24.
77. Ibid., p. 81.
78. Schultze -- Das Martyrium des heiligen Abo von Tiflis, Texte und Untersuchungen für
Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, XIII (1905), 13th Tribe, p. 19, 20.
79. E. G. White, The Great Controversy, (Pacific Press Publishing Company), 1888 edition

?It is essential that the sufferings of Jews... become worse... this will assist in
realization of our plans...I have an excellent idea... I shall induce anti-Semites to
liquidate Jewish wealth. The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will
strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best

? Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897

-Dear Lord Rothschild:

"I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the
following declaration of sympathy with the Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been
submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:"

His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the
achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done, which
may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine- or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I
should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist

Yours, Arthur James Balfour? -Balfour Promise, 1917

Site Admin
Posts: 7781


Post#2 » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:28 am



Part I


"Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog,
the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and
prophesy against him." Ezekiel 38:2


"A THOUSAND YEARS before the establishment of the Modern State of Israel, there existed a Jewish kingdom in the eastern fringes of Europe, astride the Don and Volga rivers..." So begins a thesis by Jewish author Kevin Alan Brook. The kingdom of which he speaks appears at first consideration to be comprised of nearly as much disinformation, misinformation, "myth"information, and, curiously, NO-information as there is actual provable historical fact. Yet upon closer scrutiny this kingdom, known as Khazaria, or the Kingdom of the Khazars, is clearly revealed in a vast body of historical evidence, much of which has come to light only in the last three to five decades.

This mysterious kingdom, which has sculpted our modern world to an astounding (and alarming) degree, once occupied an immense land area of over a million square miles extending from western Hungary/Austria eastward to the Aural Sea, north to the Upper Volga, and its southern region extending to the Caucasus Mountains between the Black and Caspian seas. It was at that time literally the largest country on earth. It has only been in the last several decades, however, that greater documented evidence from ancient manuscripts has come to light and revealed the astonishing historical truth of this ancient kingdom and its connection to the origins of modern-day Israel.

Though little known to the West, and, for that matter, to even those currently occupying its ancestral land, the Khazar kingdom has been responsible for substantially shaping the history and political landscape of Europe and specifically Western Asia, but also to a remarkable degree the entirety of human events on this planet.

Arthur Koestler, author of The Thirteenth Tribe, easily the most expansive single work on the subject, states, "The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated." 1

This is the story of a kingdom of belligerent, warlike Caucasian nomads, having no linked ancestry with anything Israelite this side of Noah, yet adopting Talmudic Judaism and becoming the dominant -- and virtually only -- current force in twenty-first century international Jewry.

During the course of this work salient facts and issues will be presented without a too-extensive reliance on tedious historical documentation. However, considering the delicacy of the subject -- especially in this modern age where any divergence from certain agendas for "political correctness" can result in epithets of racism or anti-Semitism -- and for the obvious sake of accuracy, reasonably comprehensive documentation is necessary.

In this it will be shown that the cry of "anti-Semitism" hurled against those who do oppose the international actions of ones calling themselves Jews, would be much like an immigrated Scotsman to America deciding to live on an Apache Indian reservation, coming to dominate its politics and economics, and then claiming that anyone disagreeing with his political and social agenda is racist and anti-Apache in their beliefs.

What under different circumstances could prove to be a dry treatise on Eastern European Jewish history is, if closely examined, actually a narrative of events that have laid a sequential pathway to, and beyond, the destruction of the New York World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. This historical time line has been fixed in its present course, which, by all appearances and in a most unexpected manner, is culminating in the fulfillment of the Biblical prophecies of Armageddon. But then, it has always been so with prophecy. The most consistent aspect in the nature of prophetic fulfillment is that it is consistently surprising. God has invariably worked to complete His desires, prophetically, in ways that have not been understood until revealed in retrospect -- in the light of their actual happening.

An Historical Perspective

Shortly after the death of Mohammed in AD 632, according to Columbia University Professor, D. M. Dunlop, Arab armies began a campaign northward, sweeping "through the wreckage of two empires and carrying all before them till they reached the great mountain barrier of the Caucasus. This barrier once passed," Dunlop observes, "the road lay open to the lands of eastern Europe." 2 Had the Caliphate (the armies of the Muslim Caliph) surmounted that immense geological deterrent unchallenged, the history of Europe and, indeed, the rest of the Judeo-Christian world would have been vastly different than it now is.

It was at the Caucasus, however, that the Arabs encountered the Khazars, initiating a war that lasted over a century and effectively prevented Europe from becoming Islamic. So powerful, socially and militarily, were the Khazars that, as Kevin Alan Brook relates in his work The Jews of Khazaria, "a 10th-century emperor of the Byzantines [Roman Empire], Constantine Porphyrogenitus, sent correspondence to the Khazars marked with a gold seal worth 3 solidi - more than the 2 solidi that always accompanied letters to the Pope of Rome, the Prince of the Rus, and the Prince of the Hungarians." 3

Rutgers University Professor Peter Golden, referred to by Brook as "one of the principal authorities on the Khazars," wrote, "Every schoolchild in the West has been told that if not for Charles Martel and the battle of Poitiers there might be a mosque where Notre Dame now stands. What few schoolchildren are aware of," Golden emphasizes, "is that if not for the Khazars...Eastern Europe might well have become a province of Islam." 4

The Khazarian mounted forces, with a soldiery of mainly Turkic and pagan origin, could at times and when accounted for, show a disastrous fierceness and cruelty to the enemies of Khazaria. They were also probably the most disciplined, as well as tactically and strategically the most potent, martial power at that time and in that region. Evidence that they were supremely calculating in their approach to international matters lay in the fact that, in contrast to their brutality, Khazar officials were often consulted as diplomatic emissaries and mediators by all the political powers surrounding Khazaria. The Khazars and their empire were at that time both highly respected and greatly feared -- with good reason. 5

At the peak of their empire it is believed that the Khazars had a permanent standing army that could have numbered as many as one hundred thousand and controlled or exacted tribute, astonishingly, from thirty different nations and tribes inhabiting the vast territories between the Caucasus, the Aral Sea, the Ural Mountains and the Ukrainian steppes. 6 , 7 During their zenith, Khazaria completely girded the lands of what are currently Astrakhan, Kalmykia, Daghestan, Volgograd, Rostov, Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkarsk, North Ossetia, and Chechnya. "At its maximum extent (in the ninth century)," says Brook, "Khazaria not only encompassed the northern Caucasus and the Volga delta, but also extended as far west as Kiev [Russia]." 8

Soviet archaeologist M. I. Artamonov states that, for a century and a half, the Khazars were the supreme masters of the southern half of Eastern Europe and presented a virtually impenetrable bulwark, blocking the Ural-Caspian gateway from Asia into Europe. During that entire period, they held back the onslaught of the nomadic tribes from the East. 9

Until recently, a great part of the problem with the historical obscurity of ancient Khazaria lay with the fact that the geographical area of the country was part of the Soviet Union, which insisted on interpreting archaeological data "within the framework of Marxist historical materialism." 10 This Iron Curtain version of historical revisionism caused the Soviets to interpret that data in such a way as to present as fact that which was well fabricated -- but wrong.

This peculiar and obscure race inhabiting that land were described as blue-eyed and of very fair complexion. Commonly they had long reddish hair and were reported as very large of stature and fierce of countenance. 11 Other sources have added observations that there were "Black Khazars" and "White Khazars," noting that the latter were "light-skinned and handsome, while the former were dark-skinned." This has, however, been rather conclusively refuted by scholars who have established that the distinction was not racial but social. The "Black" or "Kara" Khazars constituted the lower strata or caste, while the "White" or "Ak" Khazars were of the noble or royal classes. This type of class distinction was fairly common in Eastern Europe as evidenced by the more commonly known terms "Black Russian" and "White Russian," denoting not skin color but class. 12

In his book An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Peter Golden claims that the Chinese T'and-shu chronicle describes the Khazars, generally, as "...tall, with red-hair, ruddy-faced and blue-eyed. Black hair is considered a bad omen." 13


Of the ferocity and warlike tendencies of the Khazars there is little doubt and much historical evidence, all of it pointing to a race of people so violent in their dealings with their fellow men that they were feared and abhorred above all peoples in that region of the world.

The Arab chronicler Ibn-Said al-Maghribi writes, "they are to the north of the inhabited earth towards the 7th clime, having over their heads the constellation of the Plough. Their land is cold and wet. Accordingly their complexions are white, their eyes blue, their hair flowing and predominantly reddish, their bodies large and their natures cold. Their general aspect is wild." 14

The ninth-century monk Druthmar of Aquitaine, in his commentary on Matthew 24:14 in Expositio in Matthaeum Evangelistam, stated that the Gazari, or Khazars, dwelt "in the lands of Gog and Magog." 15

Legends and stories abound, some of which are true according to the above quoted Aquitaine monk, that center around Alexander the Great and his attempt to enclose the Khazars and quarantine them, due to their violent and barbaric nature, from the rest of the civilized world. This endeavor apparently failed, Druthmar claimed, and they escaped. Some legends even claim they were cannibals. 16

After the kingdom's conversion to Judaism, the term "Red Jews" came into usage out of the superstition of medieval Germans, who equated their red hair and beards and their violent nature with deceit and dishonesty. It is also well documented that they heavily taxed those passing through their lands, for none dared refuse them. 17

According to Benjamin H. Freedman, himself a Jew and an apparent long-time associate and confidant of presidents and statesmen, in an address presented in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., the Khazars were so belligerent and hostile that they were eventually run out of Asia and scattered amongst the nations of Eastern Europe. Heinrich von Neustadt, around 1300, wrote of them as the "terrifying people of Gog and Magog." 18

The territory of the Bulgars, themselves legendary for their fierceness in battle, was conquered by the Khazars in AD 642. A portion of them fled westward to the region of the Danube in the Balkans and formed what is now modern-day Bulgaria. 19 Even in modern times, Muslim history recalls the Khazar raids and the terror of those inhabiting that land. To this day they call the Caspian, Bahr-ul-Khazar -- "the Khazar Sea." 20

It is not difficult to determine some of the motivating factors behind the legendary Khazar ferocity in war. "When the bek [the Khazar head of the military and second in command only to the Kagan himself] sends out a body of troops, they do not in any circumstances retreat. If they are defeated, every one who returns to him is killed....Sometimes he cuts every one of them in two and crucifies them and sometimes he hangs them by the neck from trees." 21

Logically it seems that this would not likely happen more than once, since reason would reveal to even the dullest soldier that defeat was not an option. Such a practice would also have provided a strong impetus to the legend of Khazar fierceness since, when faced with the choice of winning in battle or facing a worse death at home, the options -- and the rational responses to them -- become painfully distinct.

All of these facts, mingled with the semi-factual legends of Alexander the Great and his attempts to wall up the Red Jews and isolate them, has led to the numerous mythologies of the coming escape, at the end of time, of Gog and Magog from the area enclosed by the Caucasus Mountains. This, as the legends say, in order to fulfill Bible prophecy in the final destruction of the world. Indeed, even Islam has such legends in its mythology.

In a writing by the Imam Ibn Kathir, he asserts that the prophet Mohammed has claimed, "Every day, Gog and Magog are trying to dig a way out through the barrier [the Caucasus mountains]. When they begin to see sunlight through it, the one who is in charge of them says, 'Go back; you can carry on digging tomorrow,' and when they come back, the barrier is stronger than it was before. This will continue until their time comes and Allah wishes to send them forth." 22

As shall be shown, the Muslims to the south of the Khazarian kingdom had good reason to attach such legends to their ferocious northern neighbors.

However, no nation can long survive,no matter how strong, by being exclusively belligerent, and the Khazars were not an exception to this. As a vital addition to their brutality they were possessed of a native, calculating wisdom in knowing, as the gambler's creed says, "when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em". This prescient political sense became evident in their diplomatic encounters with the Romans. The Roman Emperor Heraclius, in 627, formed a military alliance with the Khazars for the purpose of a final defeat of the Persians. Upon the first meeting of the Khazar king, Ziebel, with the Roman Emperor, the Khazars displayed, in full array, their skills at diplomatic flattery -- skills that would serve them well and would not disappear with their kingdom. He "with his nobles dismounted from their horses," says Gibbon, "...and fell prostrate on the ground, to adore the purple of the Caesar." So enamored was the Byzantine Emperor with this display of obeisance that it eventually led to the offer, along with many riches, of the Caesar's daughter Eudocia in marriage. 23 That union never took place due to the death of Ziebel while Eudocia was enroute to Khazaria. However, after the final defeat of Islam's designs on the Northern Kingdom in AD 730, a marriage between a Khazar princess and the heir to the Byzantine Roman Empire resulted in an offspring who was to rule Byzantium as Leo the Khazar. Thus the "King of the North" had skilfully managed to place himself on the throne of the Roman Empire. 24

After the defeat of the Persians a new triangle of power emerged, consisting of the "Islamic Caliphate, Christian Byzantium and the newly emerged Khazar Kingdom of the North. It fell to the latter to bear the brunt of the Arab attack in its initial stages, and to protect the plains of Eastern Europe from the invaders." 25 Because of their unique geographical location within the cusp created by the Caspian and Black Seas on either side, and the frightful stone barrier of the Caucasus Mountains along their southern border, defending their land was made considerably easier. This situation of geography was, according to historians, one of the major factors in shaping the history of Eastern Europe, the European continent, and ultimately the world.

The Khazars had, for years, been venturing forth southward, in their marauding raids on the Muslim countries south of the Caucasus. Now, in the early part of the seventh century, Islam came northward through the same Kasbek Pass the Khazars had used, and began a long war with the "Northern Kingdom." The major attempt of the Muslim armies to take control of the Transcaucasus came in 622 while Mohammed was still leading Islam. They conquered "Persia, Syria, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and surrounded the Byzantine heartland (present-day Turkey) in a deadly semi-circle, which extended from the Mediterranean to the Caucasus and the southern shores of the Caspian." This began a long series of incursions by both sides (Khazaria and Islam) that lasted for another thirty years. These wars eventually saw the Arabs defeated at every advance, finally ending in 652 with the death of four thousand Arab soldiers, including their commander, Abdal-Rahman ibn-Rabiah, and the Arab armies in complete disarray.

This inability to traverse the Caucasus successfully, made it logistically impossible for the Muslim armies to create an effective siege against the Roman capital of Constantinople. "Had they been able to outflank the capital across the Caucasus and round the Black Sea," says Arthur Koestler, "the fate of the Roman Empire would probably have been sealed." 26 It was this fortuitous situation, coupled with the military barrier presented by the Khazars themselves, that prevented Europe from coming under the crescent moon of Islam and creating a very different history than that which has been.

Following this expulsion of the Arabs from the Khazar homeland, the kingdom began to war for territory rather than spoil, "incorporating the conquered people into an empire with a stable administration, ruled by the mighty Kagan [the title given the Khazar king, sometimes spelled Khagan], who appointed his provincial governors to administer and levy taxes in the conquered territories. At the beginning of the eighth century their state was sufficiently consolidated for the Khazars to take the offensive against the Arabs" rather than merely defending themselves against Muslim attacks. 27

There was a brief period of Muslim incursion into Khazaria where the Caliph Marwin II, in a surprise, two-pronged attack, drove the Khazars as far back in their own land as the Volga region. His only terms for peace were that the Kagan convert to the "True Faith" -- Islam -- with which the Khazar king complied, but apparently only long enough for the Muslim Caliph to withdraw back across the Caucasus. This incident preceded by only a few years the Khazar monarch's conversion to Judaism. Most historians agree as to the motivation behind the Caliph's withdrawal. The Muslim ruler apparently realised that, unlike the more civilised Persians, Armenians or Georgians, the barbaric Khazars could not be kept under military rule at such a distance.

As mentioned previously, most historical accounts credit Charles Martel and his Francs for saving Europe from Islam. This Anglicanized version of history does not, either by ignorance or design, consider the fact that the Franco defence of Western Europe would have been futile had not the Khazars stopped the Muslim onslaught from the east.

The astounding historical result of all this is that the Khazar kingdom was able, eventually, to set up and depose an emperor from the throne of the greatest ruling power on earth at that time, The Roman/Byzantine Empire. 28 This, apparently, was only the beginning, though the records of antiquity, until recently, have largely lost sight of this historically obscure but immensely influential people.

An interesting side note to the legendary Khazarian ferocity again reveals their budding nature as negotiators and consummate politicians, a talent that only intensified under Talmudic Judaism. In The Thirteenth Tribe, Koestler tells of the Byzantine Emperor, Theodosius II, who was intent on securing the friendship of the warrior race, "but the greedy Khazar chieftain, named Karidach, considered the bribe offered to him inadequate, and sided with the Huns. Attila defeated Karidach's rival chieftains, installed him as the sole ruler of the Akatzirs [a name given the "White Khazars"], and invited him to visit his court. Karidach thanked him profusely for the invitation, and went on to say that 'it would be too hard on a mortal man to look into the face of a god. For, as one cannot stare into the sun's disc, even less could one look into the face of the greatest god without suffering injury.' Attila must have been pleased, for he confirmed Karidach in his rule."

The death of Atilla the Hun, however, precipitated the collapse of the Hunnic empire and left an Eastern European power-vacuum which the Khazars eventually filled. They then proceeded to subjugate all other surrounding tribes to the extent that, shortly after their defeat, those tribes went virtually unmentioned in subsequent historical accounts. The Khazars had just swallowed them up, historically speaking. The most difficult time they encountered in their conquests was from the Bulgars, who were "crushingly defeated" around AD 641, with a great many migrating westward toward the Danube, and as previously mentioned, eventually establishing what is now modern Bulgaria. 29


"A warrior-nation of Turkish Jews must have seemed to the
[western] rabbis as strange as a circumcized unicorn." A. Koestler

According to Benjamin Freedman the Khazars' conversion to Judaism was first precipitated by their monarch's abhorrence of the moral climate into which his kingdom had descended. Freedman has claimed, and other historians confirmed, that the "primitive" Khazars engaged in extremely immoral forms of religious practices, among them phallic worship. Animal sacrifices were also included in their rites.

The Khazar religious structure centered around a shamanism known as Tengri, which incorporated the worship of spirits and the sky as well as zoolatry, the worship of animals. Tengri was also the name of their "immortal god who created the world," and the primary animal sacrifices made to this deity were horses. 30

The actual mechanics of the Khazarian kingdom's turn to Judaism was, most historians agree, rather well thought out -- from a humanistic perspective at least -- rather than random and capricious as some have believed.

According to George Vernadski, in his book A History of Russia, in AD 860 a delegation of Khazars were sent to Constantinople (now known as Istanbul), which was then what remained of the ancient capitol of the old Roman Empire turned Christian under the Emperor Constantine. Their message was:

We have known God the Lord of everything [referring here to Tengri] from time immemorial ... and now the Jews are urging us to accept their religion and customs, and the Arabs, on their part, draw us to their faith, promising us peace and many gifts. 31

This appeal, in all its implications, was obviously made for the purpose of drawing the Christian Roman Empire into the debate with an eye perhaps toward a balanced argument amongst the major monotheistic religions.

Brook makes the observation that "this statement reveals that the Jews were actively seeking converts in Khazaria in 860." He also adds that "in the year 860, [Christian] Saints Cyril and Methodius were sent as missionaries to the Khazars by the Byzantine emperor Michael III .... since the Khazars had requested that a Christian scholar come to Khazaria to debate with the Jews and Muslims." 32

Inasmuch as the world has seldom (or perhaps never) witnessed any culture of people more adept at the art of religious debate than rabbinical Jews, the Khazar's conversion to Talmudic Judaism is not a surprising outcome, given that such a forum was to be the determining factor in their choice, rather than purely spiritual perceptions. The outcome was even further assured by the fact that the Christian representatives in the debate came from a church in the latter formative years of the Holy Roman Empire in which, by that time, spiritual sensitivity had become somewhat rare to nearly extinct.

It was at that period of time (about AD 740) that King Bulan of Khazaria was reputed to have converted to Judaism. In the debate amongst the Islamic mullah, the Christian priest and the Jewish rabbi, each presented to the king the advantages and truths of his own precepts of faith. This king, however, according to some accounts of history, had his own logic for determining which he should embrace. He asked each representative in turn, which of the other two faiths he considered superior. The result was that the Muslim indicated Judaism over Christianity, and the Christian priest chose it over Islam. The king then concluded that Judaism, being the foundation upon which both of the other monotheistic religions were built, would be that which he and his subjects should embrace. The Khazars, themselves being monotheistic, had also apparently expressed reservations about the polytheistic nature of the Trinity doctrine of the Christians. 33

So as not to exclude the Islamic account of these events, the following is taken by D. M. Dunlop from al-Bakri's eleventh century work the Book of Kingdoms and Roads:

"The reason for the conversion of the king of the Khazars, who had previously been a heathen, to Judaism was as follows. He had adopted Christianity. Then he recognised the wrongness of his belief and began to speak with one of his governors about the concern with which he was filled. The other said to him, O king, the People of the Book form three classes. Invite them and enquire of them , then follow whichever is in possession of the truth. So he sent to the Christians for a bishop. Now there was with him a Jew skilled in debate, who disputed with the bishop, asking him, What do you say about Moses, son of Amram, and the Torah which was revealed to him? The other replied, Moses is a Prophet, and the Torah is true. Then said the Jew to the king. He has admitted the truth of my creed. Ask him now what he believes. So the king asked him and he replied, I say that the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, is the Word, and that he has made known the mysteries in the name of God. Then the Jew said to the king of the Khazars, He confesses a doctrine which I know not, while he admits what I set forth. But the bishop was not strong in bringing proofs. So he invited the Muslims, and they sent him a learned and intelligent man who understood disputation. But the Jew hired someone against him who poisoned him on the way, so that he died. And the Jew was able to win the king for his religion." 34

Koestler presents an interesting alternative to these views. His position was that the king's conversion was essentially a political decision. "At the beginning of the eighth century," he writes, "the world was polarized between the two super-powers representing Christianity and Islam. Their ideological doctrines were welded to power-politics pursued by the classical methods of propaganda, subversion and military conquest."

It may be observed here that it is quite evident modern Christianity has well learned this same form of statecraft (propaganda, subversion and military conquest) inasmuch as they have torn a page directly from the first millennium history of the church.

"The Khazar Empire represented a Third Force," Koestler continues, "which had proved equal to either of them, both as an adversary and an ally. But it could only maintain its independence by accepting neither Christianity nor Islam -- for either choice would have automatically subordinated it to the authority of the Roman Emperor or the Caliph of Baghdad." 35

Although they suffered no want of protracted efforts by either Islam or Christianity to convert the Khazars to their respective religions, it resulted in no more than an exchange of political and dynastic courtesies (i.e., intermarriages and shifting military alliances, etc.). It was clear that the Khazars were determined to preserve their supremacy as a "Third Force" in the world, and undisputed leader of the countries and tribal nations of the Transcaucasus. They saw that the adoption of one of the great monotheistic religions would confer upon their monarch the benefit of both prelatic and judicial authority that their system of shamanism could not, and that the rulers of the other two powers clearly enjoyed. 36

J. B. Bury concurs: "There can be no question," he says, "that the ruler was actuated by political motives in adopting Judaism. To embrace Mohammadanism would have made him the spiritual dependent of the Caliphs, who attempted to press their faith on the Khazars, and in Christianity lay the danger of his becoming an ecclesiastical vassal of the Roman Empire. Judaism was a reputable religion with sacred books which both Christian and Mohammadan respected; it elevated him above the heathen barbarians, and secured him against the interference of Caliph or Emperor." 37

It would be illogical, however, to think that the Khazarian rulers had embraced Judaism blindly without intimate knowledge of what they were accepting. They had encountered the faith numerous times throughout the preceding century from traders and refugees fleeing persecution at the hands of the Romans, and, to a lesser degree, Jewish flight from the Arab conquests of Asia Minor.

Benjamin Freedman expresses differently the science behind the process of choosing a national Khazarian religion. He claims they were much more informal and random, and not nearly so intellectual in their approach.

It matters little what the mechanics were of the conversion of the Khazar kingdom to Judaism. It matters only that it happened, and that it happened with a clanging historical ring that resounds to the present age.

"The religion of the Hebrews," writes John Bury, "had exercised a profound influence on the creed of Islam, and it had been a basis for Christianity; it had won scattered proselytes; but the conversion of the Khazars to the undiluted religion of Jehovah is unique in history." 38

It is indeed a unique historical event, as Bury claims; however it is also interesting that he should refer to their conversion to Talmudic Judaism as "to the undiluted religion of Jehovah." It is evident that present-day Ethiopian Jews would disagree with Mr. Bury on this matter since they do not adhere to the precepts of the Talmud, Mishnah, Midrash or any of the extra-biblical writings that have arisen since the close of the Old Testament canon. These Jews of North Africa claim only Torah as their scriptural authority. And, unlike their distant "brothers" of the Talmud, they practice their religion quietly and with relatively no involvement in worldly politics.

According to an ancient document entitled King Joseph's Reply to Hasdai ibn Shaprut, Joseph (a later Khazarian king) stated that, "From that time on the Almighty God helped him [King Bulan] and strengthened him. He and his slaves circumcised themselves and he sent for and brought wise men of Israel who interpreted the Torah for him and arranged the precepts in order." 39

There appears to be as many historical accounts as to how King Bulan was converted to Judaism as there are historians and mystics to present them. Many of them involve visions of angels, such as the tale by a Sephardic Jewish philosopher detailing a dream in which an angel told the king that his "intentions are desirable to the Creator" but the continued observance of shamanism was not. 40 In the aforementioned document, King Joseph's Reply, its author claims that in that same dream God promised King Bulan that if he would abandon his pagan religion and worship the only true God that He would "bless and multiply Bulan's offspring, and deliver his enemies into his hands, and make his kingdom last to the end of the world".

It is believed by scholars that the dream was designed to simulate the Covenant in Genesis and meant to imply "that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant with the Lord, even though they were not descended from Abraham's seed." 41 [emphasis supplied]

King Joseph corroborates this in his document as he claims to have positively traced his family's ancestry back, not to Shem the father of the "Shemites" or Semite peoples, but to another of Noah's sons. "Though a fierce Jewish nationalist, proud of wielding the 'sceptre ofJudah'," Koestler says, "he cannot, and does not, claim for them Semitic descent; he traces their ancestry...to...Noah's third son, Japheth; or more precisely to Japheth's grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes."

Koestler adds a footnote to King Joseph's genealogical claims that is piercingly relevant to this study: "It also throws a sidelight on the frequent description of the Khazars as the people of Magog. Magog, according to Genesis 10:2-3 was the much maligned uncle of Togarma." Add to this that two other of the sons of Japheth, the progenitor of the Khazars, are Meshech and Tubal, central figures in biblical prophecies of the end times.

King Joseph's Reply also revealed that the successor to King Bulan, his son Obediah, "reorganized the kingdom and established the [Jewish] religion properly and correctly," bringing in numerous Jewish sages who "explained to him the twenty-four books [the Torah], Mishnah, Talmud, and the order of prayers."

This entrenchment in the Jewish religion outlasted the kingdom itself and was transplanted, whole cloth, into the Eastern European settlements of Russia and Poland. 42

Whatever the religious machinery (and/or chicanery) that was set in motion to accomplish the task, the consequence is historically undeniable that the Khazarian king was indeed converted to Talmudic Judaism. And the temporal consequences of that conversion have rung down through history like a warped and distorted bell, answering clearly to prophetic declarations of the last days of earth's history.


The Khazarian kingdom reached its peak of power and world influence in the latter half of the eighth century. The death knell of their empire was eventually seen in the dragon-headed ships of the Vikings who were to cross and navigate all the major waterways in their onslaughts. Even the legendary ferocity of the Khazars was outdistanced by these Norsemen who "did not deign to trade until they failed to vanquish; they preferred bloodstained, glorious gold to a steady mercantile profit." 43 They were also called Rus, from which descended, among others, the Russians.

Because historical Scandinavian literature did not begin until after the time of the Vikings, little of actual fact is known of them, with much of it apocryphal and contradictory and almost none of it laudatory. Of their military powers, however, virtually all accounts are in harmony. In his book, The Magyars in the Ninth Century, C. A. Macartney quotes the Arab historian, Ibn Rusta:

"These people are vigorous and courageous and when they descend on open ground, none can escape from them without being destroyed and their women taken possession of, and themselves taken into slavery." 44

There was even coined a specific term for the Viking ferocity: berserksgangr, from which is derived the English word berserk.

"Such were the prospects," says Koestler, "which...faced the Khazars."

Even in light of their viciousness and military prowess, these Norse Vikings focused their pillaging assaults on the Byzantine Roman Empire, preferring to trade with the Khazars rather than to tangle with them. Though eventually outmatched in ferocity, the Khazars were still able, for a while, to exact their ten percent taxes even from the Vikings on all of their "cargo" (more correctly spelled plunder) that passed through their land.

An interesting story emerges from this period of the Khazar Empire that gives a clear vignette of the emerging cultural schematic that was eventually to be scattered throughout the world.

In 912 the Rus Vikings, with an armada of 500 ships, each manned by 100 warriors, were set on invading and plundering the Muslim lands south of the Khazars, with whom the Khazars had a loose alliance of protection due to the thousands of loyal Muslims in the Kagan's army. The Rus commander sent a letter to the Kagan asking permission to pass through his territory, to which the Khazar king acceded on condition of receiving half of the spoils upon their return.

On the Viking's return from their bloody mission, and paying the tribute required by the Khazars, the Muslims loyal to the Khazarian monarch, who lived in the eastern part of his kingdom, requested of the Kagan that they be permitted to fight the Vikings in retaliation for what they had done to their brethren to the south. The king granted them permission to do so, which resulted in the complete eradication of the Rus force -- except for five thousand who escaped and were subsequently killed by the Butas and Bulgars to the north.

Here pictured is a classical perspective of what was to become the Khazar/Jewish heritage in nearly all their dealings -- business, social or cultural: a king who becomes a willing though passive confederate of marauding Rus/Vikings, claims half of the loot they have taken in their bloody assault, licenses a retributive attack against them by Muslims under his own command, but then informs the Vikings of the imminent reprisal he himself has authorised. 45

The weakening of the Khazar military influence had a very wide and unexpected influence in that it greatly hastened the extinction of the Byzantine Empire. They no longer had a powerful force on their eastern borders to prevent the Vikings, Mongols and others from invading an already weakened dominion. This, and internal factions within Khazaria, was the prolog to the scattering of the Khazar/Jewish seed throughout Russia and eastern Europe -- and eventually, as shall be shown, to the reshaping of world history.

The swan song of the Khazar kingdom was not a precipitous decline in a climactic or decisive series of battles, but rather a gradual, evolutionary succumbing to superior forces over a protracted period of time.

"In general, the reduced Khazar kingdom persevered," says S. W. Baron. "It waged a more or less effective defense against all foes until the middle of the thirteenth century, when it fell victim to the great Mongol invasion set in motion by Jenghiz Khan. Even then it resisted stubbornly until the surrender of all its neighbours....But before and after the Mongol upheaval the Khazars sent many offshoots into the unsubdued Slavonic lands, helping ultimately to build up the great Jewish centres of eastern Europe." 46

"Here, then," remarks Arthur Koestler, "we have the cradle of the numerically strongest and culturally dominant part of modern Jewry."

The ancient Hebrew nation had started branching into the Diaspora long before the destruction of Jerusalem. Ethnically, the Semitic tribes on the waters of the Jordan and the Turko-Khazar tribes on the Volga were of course 'miles apart', but they had at least two important formative factors in common. Each lived at a focal junction where the great trade routes connecting east and west, north and south intersect; a circumstance which predisposed them to become nations of traders, of enterprising travellers, or 'rootless cosmopolitans' -- as hostile propaganda has unaffectionately labelled them. But at the same time their exclusive religion fostered a tendency to keep to themselves and stick together, to establish their own communities with their own places of worship, schools, residential quarters and ghettoes (originally self-imposed) in whatever town or country they settled. This rare combination of wanderlust and ghetto-mentality, reinforced by Messianic hopes and chosen-race pride, both ancient Israelites and mediaeval Khazars shared -- even though the latter traced their descent not to Shem [S[h]emites] but to Japheth." [underscore supplied]

This more recent "Diaspora" resulted in a strong, oftentimes politically overwhelming, Khazar/Jewish influence in especially Hungary and Poland, but also in the whole of Eastern Europe. Jews were found in positions of power and political influence in virtually every major category of life, business and society. There may have already been a small population of what Koestler calls "real Jews" living in that region, "but there can be little doubt that the majority of modern Jewry originated in the migratory waves of ... Khazars who play such a dominant part in early Hungarian history".

The Khazar influx into the Hungary/Poland region was only a small part of an overall "mass-migration" from their homeland to Eastern and Central Europe. They were employed as "mintmasters, administrators of the royal revenue, controllers of the salt monopoly [at that time salt was a valuable commodity often used in place of money. From this comes the saying "worth his salt".] , taxcollectors and 'money-lenders' -- i.e., bankers."47

Western European Jews historically displayed such a talent and acumen at trading and as userers (money lenders) that in virtually any society and culture in which they found themselves, they became the possessors of and controlling influence over large portions of that nation's wealth. "In the 'dark ages' the commerce of Western Europe," wrote Cecil Roth in the 1973 edition of The Encyclopedia Britannica, "was largely in Jewish hands, not excluding the slave trade, and...Jew and Merchant are used as almost interchangeable terms."

"The floating wealth of the country," Roth continued, "was soaked up by the Jews, who were periodically made to disgorge into the exchequer [national or royal treasury]" 48 It was evident that the ruling class periodically became intimidated by the mass of their nation's wealth accumulating to the hands of so small a minority -- and a very clannish minority at that. This would logically give any ruling authority cause for concern -- when a particular group virtually controls the nation's economics while at the same time appearing to have a tenuous allegiance to the country in which they reside. Such a course of events evidently led to the creation of a stereotyping blueprint for Jews and Jewish communities that has been expressed -- and reacted to -- in various cultures for centuries.

"The nucleus of modern Jewry," remarks Koestler, "thus followed the old recipe: strike out for new horizons but stick together." 49 This, as previously mentioned, was the course of Western European Jews, but the similarity between them and the Khazarian Jews is striking, especially in their unequalled aptitude at things economical and political.

This mass of historical data "has lead several historians to conjecture that a substantial part, and perhaps the majority of eastern Jews -- and hence of world Jewry -- might be of Khazar, and not of Semitic Origin."

The far-reaching implications of this hypothesis may explain the great caution exercised by historians in approaching this subject -- if they do not avoid it altogether. Thus in the 1973 edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica the article "Khazars" is signed by Dunlop, but there is a separate section dealing with "Khazar Jews after the Fall of the Kingdom", signed by the editors, and written with the obvious intent to avoid upsetting believers in the dogma of the Chosen Race. [underscore supplied] 50

Abraham N. Poliak, Tel Aviv University's post-war Professor of Mediaeval Jewish History, wondered at "how far we can go in regarding this [Khazar] Jewry as the nucleus of the large Jewish settlement in Eastern Europe. The descendants of this settlement," Poliak declares, "those who stayed where they were, those who emigrated to the United States and to other countries, and those who went to Israel -- constitute now the large majority of world Jewry. [emphasis supplied] 51 Some historians, such as Austrian Hugo Kutschera, assert that Eastern European Jewry was not part, but entirely of Khazarian origin. 52

Still further proof that the Jews of Eastern Europe had no origins in the West is Yiddish, the language commonly used by the Eastern Jews. Yiddish was, until the latter part of the twentieth century, a dying language. It is an amalgamation of several tongues, primarily Hebrew, and written with Hebrew characters, but which includes much of mediaeval German and components of other languages like Slavonic. The German elements incorporated into Yiddish have been clearly shown to have originated in the east of Germany where it joined the Slavonic regions of Eastern Europe. Yiddish is a sort of linguistic "sponge" in that it readily absorbs and incorporates whatever words or idiomatic expressions best suit its purpose. It would therefore naturally have become a cultural marker for whatever region in which it was spoken, absorbing the telltale indicators of dialect like a tattoo. 53

Another respected Austrian historian, Matisyohu Meises, questions, "Could it be that the generally accepted view, according to which the German Jews once upon a time immigrated from France across the Rhine, is misconceived?" Meises, who knew virtually nothing about the Khazars, was perplexed at the fact that no Yiddish linguistic roots whatever could be traced to Western Europe. He also noted that, inexplicably, there was a large geographical gap clearly delineating the Yiddish spoken by the Eastern Khazar transplants from any spoken in Western Europe. 54

"The evidence," Mr. Koestler nicely summates, "...adds up to a strong case in favour of those modern historians -- whether Austrian, Israeli or Polish -- who, independently from each other, have argued that the bulk of modern Jewry is not of Palestinian, but of Caucasian origin. The mainstream of Jewish migrations did not flow from the Mediterranean across France and Germany to the east and then back again. The stream moved in a consistently westerly direction, from the Caucasus through the Ukraine into Poland and thence into Central Europe. When that unprecedented mass-settlement in Poland came into being, there were simply not enough Jews around in the west to account for it; while in the east a whole nation was on the move to new frontiers." 55

With the overwhelming evidence that the modern Jewish population is of Khazar origin, Koestler remarks that this would clearly indicate that "their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob." This conclusion would then logically render the epithet "anti-Semitism" "void of meaning," Koestler says.

The latter conclusion is a position Palestinian Arabs might well dispute with Mr. Koestler due to the fact that this revelation ironically places the modern Jew, currently occupying Palestine, in the unenviable position of, themselves, being anti-Semitic -- an historical mockery of somewhat amazing proportions. 56

But what, one may ask, became of the greater part of the population of "real Jews"?

Towards the close of the ninth century the Jewish settlements of Germany, who were nearly all of Semitic origin, had been virtually wiped out by the "mob-hysteria" that resulted from the First Crusade in 1096. The Encyclopedia Britannica on the Crusades vividly sets forth the mindset of the crusaders:

"He might butcher all, till he waded ankle-deep in blood, and then at nightfall kneel, sobbing for very joy, at the altar of the Sepulchre -- for was he not red from the winepress of the Lord?" 57

The Jews who found themselves in that "winepress" significantly assisted in their own demise. Like those of Massada who committed mass suicide rather than surrender to the armies of Rome, a great many of the Jews of the Rhineland and surrounding countries, when presented with the choice of baptism into "Christianity" or death at the hands of their captors, chose neither, opting for the Massada solution.

Imitating on a grand scale Abraham's readiness to sacrifice Isaac, fathers slaughtered their children and husbands their wives. These acts of unspeakable horror and heroism were performed in the ritualistic form of slaughter with sacrificial knives sharpened in accordance with Jewish law. At times the leading sages of the community, supervising the mass immolation, were the last to part with life at their own hands. In the mass hysteria, sanctified by the glow of religious martyrdom and compensated by the confident expectation of heavenly rewards, nothing seemed to matter but to end life before one fell into the hands of the implacable foes and had to face the inescapable alternative of death at the enemy's hand or conversion to Christianity. 58

Of the German cities of Worms and Spires, being somewhat representative of the whole of Western European communities that were devastated by the Crusades, Salo Baron writes, "the total Jewish population of either community had hardly exceeded the figures...given for the dead alone". 59

The most common historical concept, before the modern revelation of the existence of Khazaria, was that the 1096 Crusade literally "swept like a broom" virtually the entire German Jewish population into Poland. This was an invention of apparent necessity because those historians could account by no other means for the inexplicably large population of Eastern European Jews. They concluded this in the face of the total absence of any historical account of a mass migration of Jews to eastern Germany and certainly not Poland.

By the close of the 1300s much of Western Europe was, for all practical purposes, completely empty of any perceivable Jewish population. What the Crusades failed to accomplish in the eradication of Western European Jewry the "Black Death" -- the Bubonic Plagues of the bacilli Pasteurella pestis -- virtually completed. Those Jews of that era suffered doubly; from the plague itself and from the proliferation of superstitious rumours that they were responsible for the disease by poisoning wells, just as they were blamed earlier for "the ritual slaughter of Christian children." This resulted in the burning alive of Jews in great numbers over the whole of Europe. 60 Later some of the Sephardic Jews of Spain immigrated northward, accounting for some of the smaller Jewish populations of Western Europe.

"Because of the long and varied history of the Jews," says the 2001 edition of World Book Encyclopedia, "it is difficult to define a Jew. There is no such thing as a Jewish race. Jewish identity is a mixture of religious, historical, and ethnic factors." Thus, those who might have truly claimed to be of the genealogy of Abraham and of true Semitic origin became extinct as a discernible race, being replaced by the white Khazars of the Transcaucasus, none of whose ancestors, as Benjamin Freedman phrases it, have ever placed a foot in the land of Palestine. This causes a serious problem with modern Christianity's infatuation with the Jews and their "return to their Homeland," begging the question: How can one return to a place where they have never been?

Kingdom of the Khazars -- Part II

Disclaimer: APFN is not responsible for the accuracy of material on 'The Winds'
and does not necessarily endorse the views expressed within their web pages.

This site is in the public domain.

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Is Zionism the same as Judaism? Or The Jewish Utopia not the

Post#3 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:24 am

Is Zionism the same as Judaism? Or The Jewish Utopia not the Zionist Utopia
by Richard Allen on Saturday, May 15, 2010 at 8:01pm
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_i ... 2954038275

The following is the origin of the one world government program currently being carried out by the Jews their Mason lap-gods and various other elements which are only fronts through which the Jews work. The origins are clearly Jewish being in existence some 1500 years before the Masons even existed. The Talmud was an oral law first codified beginning around the second century CE.

Just a few side notes the numbers are notes, located at the end, that are supposed to be superscript. The large numbers are the original footnotes from the text. There originally was emphasis where the parentheses indicate there was but unfortunately it doesn't transfer in this format from MS Word.

The current state of world affairs and the path with which America and the world in general is taking begs a historical investigation. While Jews are most certainly in control of world events is it some Jews, namely Zionists, as most people claim nowadays or is it an inherent trait of the Jewish religion as a whole? People use the phrase Zionist as they somehow seek to absolve themselves from any charge of the dreaded label of ‘Anti-Semite’. While this may be comforting to those people it is unfortunately not the facts. Zionism as will be shown is merely a political form of Judaism.1 The facts are that the ‘Zionist’ non-sense is merely just a smoke screen for the true culprits. Zionism is in fact the basis of Judaism as described by the overly philo-Semitic ‘The Jewish Utopia’ by Michael Higger, Ph.D. using exclusively rabbinical sources he outlines “…the traditional Jewish conception of the ideal life for individuals, as well as for nations.”2 In the introduction he states his purpose: “For my main problem is to reconstruct an ideal social life on earth as pictured by the rabbis of old.”3 The reality of the situation is that the essence of the Jewish religion, according to the rabbi’s, is the program set forth by the Jews not exclusively Zionists. The only dispute between the Jews is the mode of bringing about the inevitable, namely interventionists versus non-interventionists in bringing about the Messianic age. The rabbi’s of Neturei Karta4 do not argue about the Jews superiority or that they are destined to rule the world, which is an unchallenged maxim. They never speak about the atrocities contained in their Holy Book the Talmud.5 So how are you to absolve such a “gutter religion” that was “originally racist”6, as if somehow it’s not now, that is something that an honest person could not do. Jewish apologists always overlook the fact that Jews have been expelled from virtually every country that has had the misfortune of hosting them7 or if they mention it all they always site this as ‘persecution’. Maybe the reason for the expulsions is the endless charges of ritual murder, not just isolated incidents but widespread claims stretching across centuries and continents. Jews did these things not only ‘Zionists’; Millions of Jews guilt Germany8 into paying them for an event that didn’t happen as they say. Jews not just Zionists committed these things. So it isn’t just Zionists as many claim, but if it makes you feel better in spite of the facts.

Michael Higger’s book is an invaluable asset to understanding the goals of world Jewry and their plans for our world and their coming dictatorship. Doctor Higger, while dismissing the Protocols of Zion, contradicts himself when speaking of the divine appointment of the leadership of the Jewish program: “A meeting of elders, appointed by God, would announce the advent of the Kingdom of God in the world, and His reign in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem.”9 (Emphasis mine) Brushing aside the Protocols as ‘forgery’10 is something done by all Jews and their gentile lap-dogs, but unfortunately for him this is exactly what he described just not in ancient writing while the Protocols are just a modern adaptation to adjust for modern means of control, apparently he doesn’t see the contradiction. Jews thus are destined to rule over us all, as prescribed by God, and decide who shall be allowed to survive the cataclysm of the coming age of God. As described by Professor Higger: “Only those peoples who believe in one God will survive in the ideal world…For, an ideal people like Israel, having attained perfection, must ultimately have a far reaching influence on the course of the destiny of nations. In the rabbinic terminology, the spiritual fire of Israel will devour the wicked nations.”11 He expands on the prerequisites for the Gentile’s continued existence, “only those who are convinced of Israel's divine purpose in the world, will be welcome to join Israel in the upbuilding of an ideally spiritual life on earth.”12 This is not the opinions of singular Jews but are the stated goals of the Jewish religion for reclamation of their rightful place ruling the world and all its inhabitants.

In his book You Gentiles, Maurice Samuel describes his loathing of Gentile society as such, “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.”13 Since the Jews can nary reside in this earthly existence they seek to subvert Gentile countries to bring about their destiny. Are these the people whom are ‘sinless’ whom we shall ‘walk in their light’ and ‘praise, in name, and in glory?’14 These aggrandized delusions would be laughable if it were not slowly unfolding before our eyes. The current consolidation of nations into a bastardized conglomerate called the United Nations, with local branches like the European Union and the coming North American Union, is also eerily foreshadowed and explained. “A model, ideal state comprising a group of righteous individuals and living an ideal life, will gradually spread its teachings and influence from nation to nation, throughout the world. The Kingdom of God will then become a fact. Israel is the only nation that is suited for that purpose. The religious experiences of Israel and the ideology of that people as voiced by the prophets, qualify it to lead the world in establishing a universal Utopia.” 15 he continues, “…all the national ensigns and laws, which are barriers to genuine international peace, brotherhood, and the happiness of mankind, will gradually disappear.”16 (Emphasis is mine)

As we see globalization and the like are well in line with rabbinical pronouncements from almost two millennia ago, so is it any question who is advancing this agenda? While lying liberals whom abhor ‘racism’ so called, utilize Orwellian ‘doublethink’ thanks to Jewish media brainwashing; continually slam ‘white’ CEO’s for, as the clichéd phrase goes, corporate globalization, which is just furtherance of the Jewish Messianic agenda. In case you still doubt this interpretation Professor Higger spells it out

In the present era every one recognizes his own standard, or flag, and through that standard, the individual identifies himself with the subdivisions of mankind. But in the ideal era, all these castes, divisions, and subdivisions will not exist. All will recognize one flag or standard, bearing the name of God. Israel is, therefore, looking forward to that day, when the prophecy of Isaiah will be realized: " Behold, I will lift up my hand to the nations, and set up Mine ensign to the peoples." There will no longer be a problem of militarism, preparedness, fortifications, barracks, armies, navies, immigration, tariffs, and their like. That problem will be a pure matter of past history and intellectual curiosity. Nations, with their respective cultures, will not only tolerate each other but will appreciate each other's cultural and intellectual backgrounds and traditions. The world will be one open city, free for intercourse of trade, migration, and education. Genuine liberty and freedom will be the watchwords of the new social order in the world. The whole earth will be for the whole human race.17 (Emphasis is mine)

The destruction of national integrity, open borders, multiculturalism and its main vehicle Communism is thus of supreme importance for furthering this program which explains the Jewish history of ruin. Now with the current ability to rule over the whole of the earth the Jewish plans have been steadily accelerating with almost daily happenings in the world that have no other purpose but advancement of these plans.

All that is left of the birth pangs is another world war; remember that at the time this book was written in 1932 there had only been one World War.

Another view, implying the same idea, is stated in the name of R. Ishmael, namely, that three wars in three different parts of the world will take place during the period preceding the advent of the ideal era. The fiercest of these three wars will be the one that will take place at Rome.18

Is this third world war to take place at Rome the final battle spoken of in the book of Revelations? Are the Rabbinical teachings and the New Testament connected? In Joseph Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah on page 6:

In a convergence unique in history, the Flavians, Herods, and Alexanders brought together the elements necessary for the creation and implementation of Christianity. They had the financial motivation to replace the militaristic religion of the Sicarii, the expertise in Judaism and philosophy necessary to create the Gospels, and the knowledge and bureaucracy required to implement a religion (the Flavians created and maintained a number of religions other than Christianity). Moreover, these families were the absolute rulers over the territories where the first Christian congregations began.19

According to Wikipedia20 Flavius Josephus, A Jew born Yosef Ben Mattityahu, the key architect of the New Testament:

was a first-century Jewish historian and apologist of priestly and royal ancestry who survived and recorded the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.[4] His works give an important insight into first-century Judaism.

Josephus was an important apologist in the Roman world for the Jewish people and culture, particularly at a time of conflict and tension. He always remained, in his own eyes, a loyal and law-observant Jew. He went out of his way both to commend Judaism to educated Gentiles, and to insist on its compatibility with cultured Graeco-Roman thought. He constantly contended for the antiquity of Jewish culture, presenting its people as civilised, devout and philosophical. Eusebius reports that a statue of Josephus was erected in Rome.[5]

Josephus's two most important works are The Jewish War (c. 75) and Antiquities of the Jews (c. 94).[6] The Jewish War recounts the Jewish revolt against Rome (66–70). Antiquities of the Jews recounts the history of the world from a Jewish perspective. These works provide valuable insight into first century Judaism and the background of early Christianity.[6]

Atwill thus describes the correlation between the Old Testament Jewish legends, which Josephus’ knowledge would factor largely in the creation of Jesus and the New Testament:

The authors of the Gospels used typology to create the impression that events from the lives of prior Hebrew prophets were types of events from Jesus' life. In doing so, they were trying to convince their readers that their story of Jesus was a continuation of the divine relationship that existed between the Hebrew prophets and God.

At the very beginning of the Gospels, the authors created a crystal-clear typological relationship between Jesus and Moses. The authors placed this sequence at the beginning of their work to show the reader how the real meaning of the New Testament will be revealed.

The sequence begins in Matthew 2:13, where Joseph is described as bringing Jesus, who represents the "new Israel," down to Egypt. This event parallels Genesis 45-50, where a previous Joseph brought the "old Israel" down to Egypt.

The authors of the Gospels associated their Joseph with the prior one by means of more than just a shared name and a journey to Egypt. The New Testament Joseph is described, like his counterpart in the Hebrew Bible, as a dreamer of dreams and as having encounters with a star and wise men.21

Whilst this proves the creation of the Gospels based on the Jewish Old Testament, upon which the Rabbinical writing are the oral tradition of, does this then prove that the Book of Revelation was written by the same Jew Josephus? Thus linking the Christian Book of Revelations and the Third World War which will take place at Rome that R. Ishmael speaks of? Wikipedia states the orthodox view of the authorship of this book as such:

The traditional view holds that John the Apostle—considered to have written the Gospel and the epistles of John—was exiled on Patmos in the Aegean archipelago during the reign of Domitian, and there wrote Revelation.22

So from this we gather that the same author of the Gospels was the author of the Book of Revelation and thus was Josephus. This further connection between the Jewish Rabbinical teachings, the New Testament and the Old Testament and with the more modern Protocols of Zion disprove any nonsense about the Illuminati or the New World Order being solely responsible for the program that has been furthered for a lot longer than any of these shadow organizations have been around.

The plans outlined for World Government in the Jewish Utopia take this a step further and then proclaim the preeminence of Jerusalem over the whole world, “The city of Jerusalem will thus become the metropolis of the whole world, and the nations will walk at her spiritual light”23 This will soon be fulfilled when Jerusalem is named the capital of the new World Government. According to a video of a Chabad Jew, Barrack Obama will bestow this honor upon Jerusalem, thus I believe that he is the Biblical Anti-Christ. We likewise see this commercial and military support of Israel by America being for told as a prerequisite for joining Israel in the coming Messianic age:

Thus, by coming in contact commercially with Palestine, especially with Jerusalem, the seat of the Jewish Utopia, the nations and rulers of the world will be greatly impressed by the spiritual unity of Israel, so that they will be converted and will join Israel.24

For all other nations and peoples who don’t recognize Israel’s eternal nature of being exclusively chosen by god himself he states:

The nations will consequently change their attitude toward Israel. Instead of despising Israel, they will pay their due respect to the ideal people. This will be in accordance with the prophecy of Isaiah: " Thus saith the Lord, the Redeemer of Israel, his Holy One, to him who is abhorred of nations, to a servant of rulers: Kings shall see and arise, princes and they shall prostrate themselves."25

This is exactly the course taken since the Second World War when such laws were passed in Europe which excluded the Jews from any criticism. The European phenomenon is slowly being transplanted in America with our passage of such Hate Crimes Laws. Professor Higger furthers the prophecy of prostration with the following lines: “No people will rule, or have power, over the ideal people.261 Every Israelite will walk upright and will fear no creature on earth.”26 With the backing of the United Nations, NATO and America this prophecy is being administered as we speak with legislation and military might. When Professor Higger wrote this tract in 1932 there was no United Nations just the League of Nations. Higger further links Jewish prophecy with current events:

The classical titterings of Isaiah and Micah, “And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more ",269—may be adopted with great advantage for mankind as an ideal motto by a twentieth century League of Nations.27

The banter of the United Nations, the successor of the League of Nations, and most contestants of the Miss America contest who all claim to want world peace fall directly in line with ancient Jewish teachings whether Miss America knows it or not. Thus he furthers this statement of world peace with the following; ‘When the Messiah arrives—say the rabbis—his message will be that of universal peace.274 The foundation of the Utopia of the righteous will be universal peace.275’28 He then goes on to tell us more in one line about the outlines of this plan than people like Alex Jones have told us in fifteen years just how they will accomplish this feat:

"The ideal Jerusalem, the capital of the ideal Zion, headed by the ideal house of David, will have her foundations rooted in universal brotherhood.277 Similarly, the ideal Israel and the returning of the exiled will signify universal peace and genuine brotherhood.278 This will be in accordance with the utterings of the Psalmist: " For not by their own sword did they get the land in possession "29 (Emphasis mine)

We already know that “In the rabbinic terminology, the spiritual fire of Israel will devour the wicked nations"30 because “…In this era you are oppressed by various governments; but in the era to come, I shall remove all governments from you."351 31 Thus we see hypsographical that the actions of Jews, both atheistical and observant, are based on Rabbinical teachings to destroy and subvert Gentile nations from the earliest recollection of their history because our nations are by nature run by oppressive forces. This then makes sense of the Maurice Samuel quote above about the Jews motives for their destruction of Gentile society.

While the Messiah will come as a man of peace the time preceding his arrival or ‘birth pangs’ will be turbulent and destructive:

"Another group of wicked nations, as typified in the traditional Edom and Rome (the Vatican?), will suffer the same fate as the first group. Their unrighteousness will be characterized by corrupt governments, and by their oppressions of Israel. These nations will not exist in the ideal era, and their rule will be abolished before the advent of the Messianic age. Allied with these unrighteous nations are those peoples who possess the wicked traits of the traditional Amalekites, Ishmaelites, and Gibeonites. Before the dawn of the new era, their end will come.

The advent of the new era will thus be preceded by the "travail " of the Messianic time, namely, great distress, foreign invasions, confusions, and moral decline. According to another tradition, the three generations preceding the Messianic period will possess abundance of silver and gold, and other luxuries. Hence, the people will lead an immoral and ungodly life."32 (Emphasis and musing mine)

Furthering these statements he says:

The second view is that the advent of the redemption depends upon the intensity of the suffering which the world will undergo by virtue of their conduct. When living conditions become unbearable, when the oppression and suffering of Israel become intolerable, so that the people of Israel repent, pray, and are fearful of the Lord, the redemption of the ideal righteous people will, by compassion of God, take place.390 33 (Emphasis mine)

With the trajectory of the 20th century we see that this second view will be the on which will guide the time preceding the Messianic age. These ancient texts would not be an issue if their contents were not projecting them onto a world stage. No other people or religions have such texts and lineages of destruction and subversion as do the Jewish texts. These are the basis of this religion and the relatively new phenomenon, Zionism, which has become a convenient cop out for people whom know these facts but wish to try and avoid the Jewish instigated taboo of ‘Anti-Semitism’ and wish to try and remain Politically Correct.

The Jews thus intend to break the people of the world down so low that they “will be so degraded and low in their learning and culture, that the lack of those qualities will be universally evident.” 34 This degradation is evident in every facet of life and on a downward spiral into further oblivion.

So to summarize the events leading to the coming Jewish Messianic age first the land of Israel was to be given to the Jews because of their sinlessness, this happened in 1948. They then need to have ‘physical salvation’ ultimately with the intervention of ‘God’ himself. 35 This will be helped along with the ‘spontaneous aid of all the nations of the earth’36 This will be accomplished through three world wars each one consolidating the world power structure leading to the second condition an all encompassing world government with the practicing of universally recognized Jewish Noahide laws.37 The next step will be the purifying38 of the Gentile nations, the depopulation of the earth possibly during or after the third world war, of all those whom don’t recognize Israel’s universal right to rule over the earth. The Jewish purifying of the Gentile lands has manifested itself in Christian doctrine as ‘The Rapture’ having it’s belief in Jesus’ statement that ‘My kingdom is not of this world’39 This rapture philosophy will allow the Jewish cleansing to be seen by Evangelical Christians as perfectly normal and a necessary step to their salvation. After the cleansing of the world the Anti-Christ, I mean Messiah from the House of David; will bring about world peace and the coming of the Jewish ‘God’ whom will rule over the ‘remnant’ of the old earth.40

“The Lord God of Israel is King, and his dominion ruleth over all."41

“Read the following prayer that is officially recited three times daily in the synagogue, and you will realize how rabbinic Judaism is directly following the footsteps of the prophets, with regard to their ideology of the Kingdom of God on earth: " We therefore hope in thee, O Lord our God, that we may speedily behold the glory of thy might, when thou wilt remove the abominations from the earth, and the idols will be utterly cut off, when the world will be perfected under the Kingdom of the Almighty, and all the children of flesh will call upon thy name, when thou wilt turn unto thyself all the wicked of the earth. Let all the inhabitants of the world perceive and know that unto thee every knee must bow, every tongue must swear. Before thee, O Lord our God, let them bow and fall; and unto thy glorious name let them give honour; let them all accept the yoke of thy kingdom, and do thou reign over them speedily, and for ever and ever. For the kingdom is thine, and to all eternity thou will reign in glory; as it is written in thy Law, the Lord shall reign for ever and ever. And it is said, And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall the Lord be One, and his name One".580 42


1 Communism is likewise a Political form of Judaism which was noted by the founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and founder of the World Jewish Congress Rabbi Stephen Wise when he said “"Some call it Communism; I call it Judaism!"
2 Michael Higger, Ph.D., Jewish Utopia preface v
3 Ibid
4 http://www.nkusa.org/
5 Shahak, Israel. Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years. Pluto Press, 2002
6 Herzog, Ze’ev, “Deconstructing the walls of Jericho” Originally in Ha'aretz 29 October 1999
http://mideastfacts.org/facts/index.php ... &Itemid=34
7 http://www.simpletoremember.com/article ... rsecution/
8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparation ... st_Germany Reparations Agreement between Israel and West Germany, Accessed 11-6-09
Finklestein, Norman “Holocaust Industry”,
http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/020802/shake.shtml Reparations shake-up proposed
As of 2002 there were ‘832,000 survivors worldwide’ so almost 60 years after we are supposed to believe that almost 6% of living Jews were in ‘extermination’ camps.
9 Jewish Utopia p 15
10 http://reason.com/archives/2000/02/01/forging-protocols Forging Protocols, February 2000 Freund, Charles Paul
11 Jewish Utopia p 34
12 Ibid p 41
13 Samuel, Maurice “You Gentiles” p 155
14 Jewish Utopia p 30
15 Ibid p 29
16 Ibid p 42
17 Ibid
18 Ibid p 38
19 Joseph Atwill, Caesar’s Messiah p 6
20 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus accessed 11-3-09
4^ See also Jerusalem’s Model in the Late 2nd Temple Period
5^ Ecclesiastical History 3.9.2
6^ a b Stephen L. Harris, Understanding the Bible, (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985).
21 Caesar’s Messiah p 7
22 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Revelation under Traditional view of authorship, accessed 11-3-09
23 Jewish Utopia p 40
24 Ibid p 41
25 Ibid p 42
26 Ibid p43
27 Ibid p 47
28 Ibid p 48
29 Ibid
30 Ibid p 30
31 Ibid p 64
32 Ibid p 36
33 Ibid p 28
34 Ibid p 105
35 Ibid p 59
36 Ibid p 79
37 Ibid p 107
38 Ibid p 114
39 Ibid p 113, Gospel of John 18:36
40 Ibid p 114
41 Ibid p 118
42 Ibid p 115

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

from the same page

Post#4 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:26 am

The Jews have these things below in their Torah and take it quite seriously:
(SEE: Militant Zionism to get a feel for how seriously)

“A model, ideal state comprising a group of righteous individuals and living an ideal life, will gradually spread its teachings and influence from nation to nation, throughout the world." probably is a reference to the Noahide Laws -The 7 Laws of Noah - a.k.a Noahide or Noachide Laws which actually has many more subdivisions to the main 'Seven'.

For me the discovery most dramatic in the last few years is just how "Judaized" the world really is - and exposing this profound truth can get one called names - though I think we are beginning to not be alone in this "revelation of the ages" - even the notorious Freemasonry is simply "Judaism for Gentiles" - and a primary organization for introducing the concepts and teachings of the so-called "7 Laws Of Noah" SEE: http://watch.pair.com/law.html
Freemasonry like the Noahide Laws creates "Hasidic Gentiles" also known as "Righteous Gentiles" - who are righteous as they bow down to the LAWS of Talmudic Modern Rabbinical Judaism - which is FUNDAMENTALLY Modern PHARISAISM - by the Jews own admission.

So perhaps you say - oh I am not Christian - No problem -Once they have you caught not following the Noahide Laws that REQUIRE REJECTION OF CHRIST they plan on enforcing the consequences (besides they will NOT accept NO religion & ONLY the JUDAIZED Noahide Laws as a religion - there are indications that some Jews at least do accept Islam as practicing a form of the Noahide Laws): http://www.staticbrain.com/index.php?s=apostasy
http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/C ... 20page.htm
They can just say you kicked your dog - No dog? No problem - the testimony of a SINGLE Jew will be sufficient EVEN IF it is NOT TRUE~!!!
July 17, 2010 at 2:32pm
Russell Harold Kelley I believe that Zionism is indeed at the very heart of Judaism which is actually Modern Rabbinical Talmudic-Pharisaism -by the Jews own admissions Pharisaic thought dominates "Judaism" since after AD 70 at least = and Pharisaism is what Jesus condemned as "Traditions of men teachings". One can NOT honestly separate the two - we can only perhaps say that there are variations in Zionist thought - Militaristic Zionism (http://nord.twu.net/acl/zionism.html) is of course among the worst - and Zionism seeks far more than a homeland" for the Jews - it seeks World Domination - so it still seeks World Domination whether there are good Zionists or truly evil "hidden" Illuminati Zionists - founded by supposedly apostate Sabbatean Frankist Jews http://cliffordshack.com/frankist-freemason-chrono.html - the Jews in their scriptures and teachings FULLY EXPECT a messiah to come and bring ALL Gentile (Non-Jew) nations to BOW DOWN to that Messiah King who will rule with an "Iron Rod" and make all nations SUBSERVIENT to the Jews. Some Jews believe that THEY THEMSELVES ARE THEIR OWN MESSIAHS and are NOT waiting for any God - they want it ALL NOW! The "Bad" Sabbatean Frankists (Jews) are simply apostates of an already apostated religion when we see that they follow what Jesus condemned for being apostate to what God wants them to follow. As to whether the bad or worse Jews & Freemasons (Hasidic Judaized Gentiles - a.k.a "Righteous Gentiles" & Noahides due to following the Judaic Laws ) are trying to fool us with putting blame onto the Orthodox "kinder" Jews will seep us into more debates - there may be factions of "Jewish" & Freemason "gangs" or "cabals" fighting for the ultimate control - as we can see in the Jews and Hasidic Gentiles United pages: http://www.noahide.com/index.htm WHO seem to be at odds with COMMUNISM ( quite possibly & most likely a ruse/trick) which was once again like Zionism created by Jews. Yet Communism is most definitely being used blended with capitalism to put the BIG SQUEEZE on all of us. It is possible that the money powered Jews are using the greed & desire for power to utilize what is already naturally there - supremacist dogmas taught in their written and oral traditions - Talmud - Kabballah - Zohar etc. to get these Religious Jews to look bad & supposedly there are "Torah Only" Jews - but even in the Torah/Tanakh are found reasons for the Jews to feel supreme over all others - maybe the Jews UNAFFECTED by Talmudic & Kabbalah teachings may be the most kind - like the Karaite Jews & any Ethiopian Jews for examples who have not been forced to learn the Talmudic variety of teachings. It seems though the secularistic & atheistic Jews still have a heavy dose of supremacist ideology from somewhere.

Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of worshipping Jesus Christ! A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by their OWN leaders, Senators and Congressmen, who have sold their soul to the devil.
http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/C ... 0page.html
July 17, 2010 at 2:34pm · 1 person
Russell Harold Kelley The Noahide Zionist Plot can even be found on the USA JAHG site: http://www.noahide.com/finalwar.htm
Our most pressing task, to put it simply, is to launch an international Noachide revolution without delay. The process has already begun, with dozens of tiny Noachide communities having appeared throughout the United States, generally composed of former Christians who have abandoned that religion. The task of organizing the revolution can be divided into two broad stages:

I) We must first create a new Noachide society as an international network of communities and organizations functioning inside, but separately from, the surrounding society (based on halachic requirements and directives, Noachide institutions function quite differently from their Christian and secular counterparts).

This starts with an aggressive outreach program, by Jews and Noachides alike, to teach gentiles about their responsibilities according to Torah.

Simultaneously, we must organize functioning programs and institutions that are prepared to absorb these vast numbers of ex-Christians and immediately involve them in efforts to bring Moshiach. The Noachide communities require schools for their children, modeled after the Jewish yeshiva programs; Torah study groups geared for their specific needs; coordinated celebrations of appropriate Torah holidays; family services for marriage, support for the elderly, and burial; courts of justice, led by rabbinically trained righteous judges, which will function similarly to Jewish batei dinim; and tzedaka programs to assist the needy, to build new Noachide schools, and to support Jewish settlements in Israel and synagogues throughout the diaspora.

2) In the second stage, the growing Noachide movement will seize political power—using only peaceful, lawful means—in the capitals of the Western nations. This, of course, will not take place until the Noachide society has grown to some threshold size. We do not know how large this needs to be nor which nations will join the revolution first, although the United States, as a fairly religious, conservative nation, certainly tops the list of prospects.

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. All economic and technological aid to the Communist Bloc, including the PLO, will be terminated immediately. (I think this is most likely a trick or ruse to confuse us) Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha; in the United States, the emphasis will be on restoring the authority of the Constitution and abolishing all unconstitutional government programs and agencies. The national debt will be foreclosed, probably by paying off creditors with government land holdings, thus averting economic disaster. And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.

Almost as soon as aid to the Communist Bloc stops, the international Communist revolution will plunge headlong into crisis. The captive peoples, seeing their liberation at hand, will genuinely rise up to throw their brutal dictators out of power, and the armies of Gog and Magog—ranging from the Soviet Communists to the PLO—will self-destruct before the eyes of the entire world.

Naturally, Amalek's agents will scream hysterically to intimidate Jews from carrying out the above campaign, hoping to delay this victory. They have no power, however, to prevent our successful action; they can only try to create doubts and hesitation.

As the world plunges headlong toward the imminent revelation of Moshiach while the last walls of the exile disintegrate, the number of confused gentiles ready to change is rising exponentially. If the Jewish people immediately begin preparing adequate structures for the Noachide movement, this tide will be channeled directly into a glorious revelation of Truth. But if we allow ourselves to be caught unprepared, this same overwhelming force for social change can, G-d forbid, be diverted to empower Amalek's final assault on holiness. It is not a matter of whether gentile society will explode in the face of the growing crisis; this event is an inevitable, and fast-approaching, reality. We do not want to miss this incredible opportunity to provide light in the final moments of darkness.

The world has reached its ultimate point of decision, and the power to succeed belongs entirely to the Jewish people. We can wait until Moshiach comes on his own, following a world war, or we can bring him through our own actions, as the Lubavitcher Rebbe has stated is our mission. The choice is ours.

There is not a minute to waste. Jews everywhere, unite!

Site Admin
Posts: 7781

Panic from the Houses of Congress and Aipac?

Post#5 » Mon May 02, 2011 11:21 am

If anything in this article is true, then it is a good thing for Amerika.
The less control of our country by these anti-American freedom hating parasites is a great day indeed.

Unfortunately, im not buying it. All the wrong bolshevik-Joos are in all the Right police state position to do tu us, what their grand parents did to Russia, Ukraine, and the rest of eastern europe. Not gonna happen here in Amerika as long as me and my band are around.

PS the ADL has got to go. defunded, destroyed, and banished from these shores

Panic from the Houses of Congress and Aipac?
http://www.opinion-maker.org/2011/05/pa ... and-aipac/
Posted on 01. May, 2011 by Franklin Lamb in Israel

By Dr Franklin Lamb


On April 13, 2011, more than a dozen Israel “First, last and always” US congressional leaders from both houses of Congress held an urgent conference call organized by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Their purpose was to discuss how best to promote Israel during next month’s US visit by Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu and more importantly how to confront the rapidly changing Middle East political landscape. One consensus was that no one saw it coming and that it was dangerous for Israel.


Among those participating were former Jewish Chairman of powerful committees including Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who headed the Banking Committee; Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), ex-chairman of the Commerce and Energy committee; Howard Berman (D-Calif.), ex-chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee; and Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), ex-chairwoman of the foreign operations subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee as well as Eric Cantor, House Majority leader, the highest ranking Jewish member of Congress in history.

What AIPAC operatives reportedly told the conference attendees was that Netanyahu is once again furious with President Obama and outraged by what he sees as a vacillating US Government attitude towards Israeli needs. They were told that the Israeli PM sees real political danger for Israel in the shifting US public opinion in favor of the young sophisticated attractive Arab and Muslims increasingly seen on satellite channels from the region who remind the American public of their own ideals.

Netanyahu, the conferees were told, wants Congress to flex its muscle with the White House and deliver a strong message to President Obama that his political future is tied to Israel’s. Hence the current “America needs Israel more than ever stupid!” campaign wafting from the Israel lobby across the talk radio airwaves.

In addition, as more Israeli officials are indicted for various domestic crimes, and some harbor fears of arrest for international ones, 68% of the American Jewish community, according to one by poll commissioned last month by Forward, believe the US Israel lobby is increasingly fossilized with the likes of ADL (Anti-Defamation League) director Abe Foxman’s vindictive infighting among several of the largest Jewish lobby organizations which continue to lose memberships, especially among the young.

Congressman Eric Cantor lamented that “Israel is badly losing the US College campuses”, despite heavy financial investments the past few years to curb American students growing support for Gaza, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, all dreaded symbols of the growing opposition to the 19th Century Zionist colonial enterprise. Support for Palestine is skyrocketing he claimed. “Until Palestine is freed from Zionist occupation no Arab or Muslim is truly free of Western hegemony,” according to one assistant editor of Harvard University’s student newspaper, the Crimson.

Admitting that the Mossad did not foresee even the Tunisian or Egyptian uprisings, some AIPAC staffers, of whom there are more than 100, admit to not knowing how to react to the topics they were presented with for discussion, some of which included:

The Egyptian public emphatic insistence that the 1978 Camp David Accords be scrapped and that the Rafah crossing be opened. The latter has just been announced and the former is expected to be achieved before the end of the year.
The change of regimes and the dramatic rise in publicly expressed anti-Israel sentiment and insistence that Israel close its embassy and Egypt withdraw its recognition of the Zionist state.
The apparent rapprochement between Fatah and Hamas which has been increasingly demanded by the Palestinians under occupation and in the Diaspora.
The fact that the new regime in Cairo is seeking to upgrade its ties with Gaza's Hamas rulers as well as Iran.
With respect to possible PA-Hamas rapprochement, U.S. National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor is trying to reassure Israel before Netanyahu’s visit by announcing this week that "The United States supports Palestinian reconciliation on terms which promote the cause of peace, but to play a constructive role in achieving peace, any Palestinian government must renounce violence, abide by past agreements, and recognize Israel's right to exist."

AIPAC frequently knocks heads with the Israeli embassy in Washington for control of visiting Israeli PMs' and important government’s schedules will control what Netanyahu says and does. AIPAC Executive Director Howard Kohr recently told a group of visiting Jewish student activists from California that “sometimes there is confusion in this town over just where the Israeli Embassy is located but let me assure you it’s no more than 300 yards from the Capitol Dome on North Capitol Street, NW.”

AIPAC, not the Israeli Embassy will write the final draft of Netanyahu’s speeches including the themes he will emphasize. According to a Congressional source with AIPAC connections, Netanyahu’s visit will focus on the following:

Bashing Iran to please the White House. However, this mantra will have to compete with the democratic revolutions that are sweeping the Arab world and which are terrifying not just Netanyahu, but also AIPAC and their hirelings in congress.
Warning against the dangers to “the peace process” of any PA-Hamas unity government.
Warnings about the threats to Israel from Egypt and popular calls for scrapping of the 1978 Camp David Accords, ending the Egyptian subsidy and supply of 40% of Israel’s natural gas, calls for closing the Israeli Embassy, the dangers of permanently opening the Rafah border crossing “that will allow Hamas to in the words of, an Israeli official speaking on condition of anonymity to the Washington Post that Gaza's Hamas rulers had already built up a "dangerous military machine" in northern Sinai which could be further strengthened by opening the border.
The tried and tested bromide that “Israel has no peace partner to negotiate with will be used but this too has lost its bite given that the Palestine Papers has shown that the PA for five years habitually caved into Israel demands and are widely viewed as collaborators with Israel in preserving the status quo– so what more could be expected from them? The truth is that Mahmoud Abbas and Salem Fayyad are Netanyahu, Liberman’s and Barak’s favorite “peace partners.”
Netanyahu will hint at and AIPAC will drill in the idea that the Obama administration has been too hard on Israel.

While Netanyahu announced this week that "I will have the opportunity to air the main parts of Israel’s diplomatic and defense policies during my visit in the United States”, informed sources report that his main goal and timing of his visit is to undermind a rumored initiative that President Obama’s team has been working on

Netanyahu, according to AIPAC, also plans to attack the UN’s plan to admit Palestine and its offices are preparing a media blitz in an attempt to undermine the U.N. recognition of Palestine by arguing that such a General Assembly action would not in reality mean Palestinian sovereignty over the West Bank and East Jerusalem because of the fact that Israel currently controls those territories. AIPAC is arguing that such United Nations recognition of Palestine would only reiterate the principle, previously articulated by the U.N which denies the legitimacy of Israel's claim to territories acquired by force in the war of June 1967.

In reality, and as AIPAC well knows, UN recognition of Palestine would have a devastating effect on Israel’s legitimacy and would fuel an international campaign to force every colonist out of the West Bank. Given the feelings of virtually all people in the Middle East and North Africa toward Israel this could dramatically undermine the apartheid state. AIPAC and Israel’s agents in Congress also ignore the fact that the U.N. is the only the international body that admitted Israel as a member state in May 1949, although the resolution noted a connection between Israel's recognition and the implementation of resolution 181 of November 1947, which called for partition of what had been British Mandate Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states.

The reason that intense angst and even fear stalks the Houses of Congress and AIPAC is that Netanyahu will remind his hosts in the coming days that Israel has always called “home” is that some US officials are starting to express treasonous thoughts long kept to themselves.

One seemingly shocking statement was made to a visiting Oregon delegation during a recent visit to Congressional offices by a Member of Congress never known for being publicly critical of Israel. As reported via email: “He said recent events suggest that while ( the revolts spreading, across the Middle East) are not the immediate end of the State of Israel, he believes they are harbingers and signal the ‘beginning of the end of the State of Israel as we have known it. And that will be good for America and humanity.”

“What seems to have particularly upset him was his own mentioning to the group was a recent report about a conference of Rabbis in Israel who are demanding

He quoted Dov Lior, the rabbi of Kiryat Araba, anillegal settlement near Hebron, who according to media reports told a conference organized to discuss how to get non-Jews in mandatory Palestine to leavethe country for the sake of Jewish immigrants who had no roots in Palestine: "Today there is a lot ofland in Saudi Arabia and in Libya, too. There is a lot of land inother places. Send them there." As scholar Khalid Amayreh reminds us, it was Lior, who in 1994 praised arch-terrorist BaruchGoldstein for massacring 29 Arab worshipers at the Ibrahimi Mosque indowntown Hebron, said peace in the Holy Land was out of the question becausethe Arabs wouldn't allow Jews to usurp the land.

Meanwhile, a large coalition of pro peace and pro-Palestinian organizations, under the umbrella of http://www.moveoveraipac.org/ is preparing a new and different American reception for the Israeli Prime Minister.

Large Visitor Globe
Rating: 8.6/10 (11 votes cast)

Tags: AIPAC, Barney Frank, Dr Franklin Lamb, Henry Waxman, Howard Berman, Israel, Mid East revolts, Nita Lowey, Opinion Maker, US
8 Responses to “Panic from the Houses of Congress and Aipac?”


02. May, 2011

Give the Palestinians their country back which owned and occupied for 11,000 years. Close up the Israeli shop for good.
Reply to this comment


02. May, 2011

There is a universal law for all nations and peoples This is the law of sewing and reaping. All who sew wickedness will reap a whirlwind. Knowing this, a sane and civilized nation and people would refrain from acts of wickedness. Unfortunately, Israel, like America and many other nations have sewn wickedness and are about to reap that whirlwind. Or, if they come to their senses, they could treat others the way they want to be treated. A tree is known and judged by its fruit.

Reply to this comment

American Patriot

02. May, 2011

'"By Deception, Thou Shalt Make War" and they certainly do!
Reply to this comment

Jim Kirwan

02. May, 2011

Type your comment here…
Netanyahu should STAY HOME: that Zionist is NOT welcome in the USA. If he does show up then he should be bring us back all that money that we have poured into that failed place he calls home – Israel! Until ISRAEL, can begin to act like it has any respect for anyone besides Zionists; neither Israeli's nor Zionists shoudl find a welcome anywhere outside that hell hole that is the site of the continuing CRIMES INSIDE ISRAEL, among the Palestinian people that have been treated worse than any of the former Nazi's ever treated any of thieir prisoners. Israel today is a predatory outlaw-state and the world is rapidly coming to that conclusion, minute by minute, day by day – STAY HOME NETANYAHU, you are NOT welcome here!
Reply to this comment

Gas prices and debt to dominate Congress in May (Reuters) | BeyonceSpecial

02. May, 2011

[...] Panic from the Houses of Congress and Aipac? | Opinion Maker [...]
Reply to this comment


02. May, 2011

Oh BS, Netanyau owns Obama. They are paniced because he is going ot lose the next election and he is one of the few candidates that they control completely. So now they have to rescue his image by pretending he is not helping Israel. MY GOD, THEY DO THINK WE ARE STUPID CATTLE, DON'T THEY??? WRONG!!!! WE DON'T BUY YOUR DISINFO, PROPOGANDA ANYMORE THAN WE BUY YOUR SET UP ADL CONTROL OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OUR MILITARY, AND YOUR CONTROL OF OUR INTEL SERVICES.
Forget it, you have declared war on us using WMD in the form of HAARP all over the midwest, trying to create a split in the nation with the madrid fault line and flood our great lakes with gulf seawater and if you succeed, then all bets are off, its war with you and treason with our military who would do this. The airforce needs to bomb those haarp facilities once and for all for using them against our own people. What unmitigated psychos these people are.
Reply to this comment


02. May, 2011

Love my country but I hate my Zionist occupied government. Jews have control of Congress, the White House and banking. We are fighting two wars for Jewish interests. The US will collapse under a mountain of debt, chaos will ensue, martial law will be declared and life as we know it will come to an end. The overwhelming amount of ignorance displayed by the average American will bring about the end of freedom. The young, for the most part are totally and continually distracted from reality with their i-pads, cell phone, television and music. Seems like they could care less about what is happening to their country. Where are the protests? Where is the empathy? This is the most immoral, corrupt and kill crazy generation in the history of the US. Soon the Jew controlled media will launch the next phase of the assault on the minds of the young. They will turn race against race, young against old. We deserve whatever punishment comes our way. God forgive us for we know not what we do.
Reply to this comment


02. May, 2011

Interestingly, even American comic hero SUPERMAN has turned against his Jewish Occupied government and has threatened to renounce his US citizenship.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/05/01 ... s-to-iran/

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest