The Inmates Have Taken Over the Asylum:

Please use this box to talk about anything and everything - Guest Posting Dis-abled for now thanks to the assholes posting their Viagra & Casino PORN crap ADS here
pokerkid
Site Admin
Posts: 7781

The Inmates Have Taken Over the Asylum:

Post#1 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:35 pm

From Michael Hoffmans Newsletter:
The Inmates Have Taken Over the Asylum:

Combating Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck's Insane Martin Luther King Cult
with Documentary Truth

by Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org
Copyright©2010. All Rights Reserved

"Look around you. You're not alone. You are Americans! You have the same
steel spine and the moral courage of Washington and Lincoln and Martin
Luther King. It is in you. It will sustain you as it sustained them.”

-Sarah Palin at Glenn Beck's rally, Washington D.C., Aug. 28, 2010

"Mr. Beck read Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address and quoted from
Martin Luther King.”

-Wall Street Journal

The double-minded Mrs. Palin told the huge crowd at Mr. Beck's rally to
honor America's combat veterans even while she was honoring King, the
man who said that America "had committed more war crimes than any nation
in the world."

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer
Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman
Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It," according to
the testimony of King's best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H.
Williams.

The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized
from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation
recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G.
Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The
Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin
Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff
included King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at both Boston
University and Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged retroactively by the
standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed
by numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are
particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate
study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,"
written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S.
Brightman, author of The Finding of God.

Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology," written
shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a
book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in
the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he was
awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences
plagiarized from the PhD. dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, "The Place of
Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God."

According to The Martin Luther King Papers, in King's PhD. dissertation
"only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or
more words that were King's own...."!

In The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow,
a Leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King's wife,
Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice
in his repeated cheating. ("King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and
Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow's study, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that
King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which
a PhD. would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain
the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one
might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston
University grant him passing grades and a PhD?

Garrow states on page 89: "King's academic compositions, especially at
Boston University, were almost without exception little more than
summary descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings.
Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades,
strongly suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...." The
editors of The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that "...the failure
of King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable...."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision, purposely
covered up his cheating for decades. From the New York Times of October
11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a
committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, "There is
no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation." However,
despite its finding, the committee said that "No thought should be given
to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action the panel
said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud
as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor" should be removed from
King's name.

Shortly before the King Holiday was shamefully signed into law by
President Ronald Reagan in 1983, Governor Meldrim Thompson of New
Hampshire wrote a letter to Reagan expressing concerns about King's
morality and Communist connections. Mr. Reagan responded, "I have the
reservations you have, but here the perception of too many people is
based on an image, not reality. Indeed, to them the perception is
reality.”
W
ith supreme cowardice, Reagan then went ahead anyway and signed the
holiday into law, thereby sentencing millions of public school children
to annual brainwashing concerning King's "noble" agenda of curbing the
right of property (who you will house) and the right of free association
(who you will hire or serve in your business). Thanks to Reagan,
millions of American youth are taught to honor a serial adulterer who
spent his last night on earth slapping around the prostitute with whom
he had been consorting.

King is the man the Israeli pawns Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck are making
the centerpiece of their campaign to "Restore America." Can you see the
Talmudic hand behind this mockery? Martin Luther King radically advanced
the revolutionary subversion of the Constitution of the United States.
He "restored” nothing!

Hoffman’s column is made possible by your donations. Without donations
this service cannot continue. Donate by VISA or Mastercard:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1 ... aypal.html

Donate by check or money order: Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816

***

The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com

Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.

Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.

hangman
Acolyte
Posts: 1087

Post#2 » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:25 pm

King was bad enough for justification, but Abraham fucking Lincoln. He's the war criminal who started Leviathan and his name means enemy to this Sothron.

SatanSlayer72
Acolyte
Posts: 219

Post#3 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:15 pm

Quote: "Garrow states on page 89: 'King's academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors did not expect more....' The editors of The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that '...the failure of King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is
somewhat remarkable....'"



In other words, folks, A NIGGER AIN'T NOTHIN' BUT A NIGGER. ;-( ;-)



Martin Lucifer Coon's Jewish professors at least realized this, seeing him as the usefool idiot that he was.



WHIGGERS, on the other hand, who make up the overwhelming majority of the so-called "White race" here in Amerika, never will. Not until they find themselves in the same postiion as those White citizens of New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina.



Then we'll see who the Wat Tylers are and who the Wally Cleavers are. ;-(

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest